Skip to main content

Biblical Literalism and the “Redemption Racket”

by Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D.

The leaders of America’s Christian fundamentalists and biblical literalists are constantly whining about being mocked and ridiculed. There are good reasons for the derision, and no one better personifies those reasons than Ken Ham, the founder of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum.

On 17 February 2010, the Associated Press ran a story about Mr. Ham’s latest pronouncement. It was also carried by OneNewsNow – the propaganda organ of Don and Tim Wildmon’s rabidly anti-gay (and anti-gay families), anti-civil equality, anti-reason, anti-science American Family Association website – under the title “Creation Museum founder: U.S. should take Genesis literally”:
In what he characterized as a “State of the Union” speech from his museum in Kentucky, Ken Ham rebuked churches and Christian scholars who don't believe in a young Earth and creation in six days. “That’s why we have such a weak church, why a church is not touching the culture,” he stated. “[T]he church in our Western world needs to repent of compromise and get back to the authority of the Word of God and stand unashamedly on the Word of God.” 
Apparently Mr. Ham wants churches and “Christian scholars” to intentionally lie. It’s absolute fact that the earth is not 6,000 years-old, as Mr. Ham insists, nor did human children play with dinosaurs in Eden as his museum asserts. Mr. Ham and those who believe as he does seem little more than scared children who refuse to recognize the Old Testament for what it is: stories created by Bronze Age people to explain what they didn’t understand and to create fear of a wrathful “God,” thus enabling his priests and prophets to control the people. The same hold true today. 

Don and Tim Wildmon’s American Family Association conducted a poll in mid-February in relation to Mr. Ham’s statements. The question asked was “What side of the argument would your pastor take in the evolution-vs.-creation debate?” The offered responses were

  • The first chapter of Genesis says it all – literally 
  • God created the earth, but probably populated the planet through the evolutionary process 
  • Scientific explanation (Big bang theory, for example) is more believable than Genesis 1 
  • I do not attend church
When I checked the results of the poll on February 17, 2010, at 2:33 PM, 1,060 AFA viewers had voted:
  • The first chapter of Genesis says it all – literally -- 87.08% 
  • God created the earth, but probably populated the planet through the evolutionary process -- 6.98% 
  • Scientific explanation (Big bang theory, for example) is more believable than Genesis 1 -- 2.36% 
  • I do not attend church -- 3.58%

The 87.08% response rate from AFA readers was not surprising. The other percentages, however, offered some hope that reason and rationality are not completely dead among some of those readers.

Updated Poll Results:

When asked by Bill Maher in the quasi-documentary Religulous (2008), why he insisted the earth was 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs coexisted with humans, Mr. Ham responded, “If you’re saying this part [of the Bible] over here that says God made land animals and man on the same day is not true, then, ultimately, why should I believe this bit over here?” Religion, for Mr. Ham and his followers, is a house of cards. Any card that falls brings down the entire structure. 

Yet Ham and his followers continue to reveal their hypocrisy. Is Mr. Ham et al in favor of selling daughters into slavery? Is Mr. Ham in favor of stoning to death people who wear clothing made of two different threads? Is Mr. Ham in favor of stoning non-virgin brides? Is Mr. Ham in favor of killing gays? All of these were “God’s commands” in the Old Testament? Or is Mr. Ham just content with making a very good living from promoting Genesis as literal “truth,” being the curator the Creation Museum, and his lucrative speaking engagements?
What type of person is attracted/drawn to the biblical literalism and religious fundamentalism advocated by Mr. Ham?

Generally speaking, those who are very insecure and afraid of reality. People who are so insecure and so afraid of life and reality that they withdraw into a cozy little box that has on its entrance: “No Thinking Required Here. Just Believe and Obey.” Such people prefer to believe absolutely in a book that contains texts written by Bronze Age people who didn’t know North and South America, Australia, or Antarctica existed. Nor did they know the earth was round and not the center of the solar system. But then again, religious fundamentalism does make not thinking a virtue. 

Fundamentalism also seems to give its adherent a sense of their own moral superiority and that they – and they alone – know “the Truth” and will be saved during “the Rapture.” Perhaps that’s also one of the draws of fundamentalism: to be among the elite, the self-righteous, the saved.

Christian fundamentalism also seems to thrive on a type of fatalism, a gleeful welcoming of the end of the world that would likely appeal to someone at odds with this world and life in general. Consider an article titled “The World as It Really Is” by Jim Fletcher, whose latest book is titled It's the End of the World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine), with the subtitle “How to stop worrying and learn to love these END TIMES.”
After listing some human miseries he saw while strolling around Austin, Texas, Mr. Fletcher stated:
But even in all this misery, I thought about how it confirms the Bible. If the Bible is true, we would expect to see a diseased and dying world. A physically dying world. Pollution. Corruption. Illness. … 
The Bible’s early books contain the history of Earth’s beginnings. Genesis contains the historical account of man’s spiritual and physical fall. In those brief verses, we can know enough to figure out our world. … 
If the Bible is literally true, then human misery is “God’s will.” That’s a strange sort of “loving God” who takes pleasure in torturing His creations. But it’s the opening of the second paragraph that speaks to the essence of fundamentalism’s glorification of irrationality and mind-numbing simplicity. Genesis contains “the history of Earth’s beginnings”: the earth is a flat disk supported by pillars and covered by a dome to keep out all those celestial waters and, according to Mr. Fletcher, Genesis is all we need to know “to figure out our world.” The Kafkaesque appeal of fundamentalism: no thinking needed, just believe, obey and send in your donations to help spread “the Truth.”

The “wisdom” of Mr. Fletcher continued when he explained how it was not the slaughter and torture of millions and millions of people by religious zealots during the last two millennia, but “the beginnings of modern evolutionary thought, which has destroyed millions and millions of people, and now has America’s children in its grip.” 

Can you think of ANY incident in the 151 years since the theory of evolutionary in which evolutionists killed, maimed, waterboarded, or in any way “destroyed” fundamentalists in the name of Darwin? Mr. Fletcher would, no doubt, bring up Hitler and the “connection” his ilk like to posit between Darwin’s theory and Nazi-style eugenics. Madmen such as Hitler cherry-picked and used whatever they could to advances their cause, including Christianity.
As for science, reason and critical thinking having “America’s children in [their] grip,” GOOD! Perhaps they will then be able to see through the irrationality and inherent bigotry that underwrite religious fundamentalism and the hypocrisy of its leaders:
Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.
-- Matthew 19:24, NRSV 
Ultimately, biblical literalists and fundamentalist preachers are selling their product: salvation. And business is good. Jerry Falwell left millions and his private jet to Liberty University. Pat Robertson used to breed thoroughbred racehorses on his expansive Virginia estate.
Alex Koppelman was correct when he suggested America’s fundamentalist leaders run “the redemption racket.” And intricate to that racket is Genesis as literal history. Mr. Ham is just playing his part… and profiting from it.




Popular posts from this blog


By David Andrew Dugle ~ O ctober. Halloween. It's time to visit the haunted house I used to live in. When I was five my dad was able to build a big modern house. Moving in before it was complete, my younger brother and I were sleeping in a large unfinished area directly under the living room. It should have been too new to be a haunted house, but now and then I would wake up in the tiny, dark hours and see the blurry image of a face, or at least what I took to be a face, glowing, faintly yellow, high up on the wall near the ceiling. I'm not kidding! Most nights it didn’t appear at all. But when it did show itself, at first I thought it was a ghost and it scared me like nothing else I’d ever seen. But the face never did anything; unmoving, it just stayed in that one spot. Turning on the lights would make it disappear, making my fears difficult to explain, so I never told anyone. My Sunday School teachers had always told me to be good because God was just behind m

How to come out to your parents as non-religious

By Marlene Winell ~  A fter going through your own deconstruction of religious belief, it can feel like a challenge to reveal your change to your religious parents.   You might have a lot of fear about their reaction – anger, hurt, disappointment in you, and so on.   You might fear being disowned.   This is a common concern because our families mean a lot to us.   It’s natural to want approval from your parents.   When you were young, you depended on them for your life; you absolutely needed their love, care, and approval.   So, even in adulthood, we long for our parents to love us unconditionally.     However, in terms of human development over the life span,  it is necessary for   everyone   to outgrow their parents.   Growing up to maturity involves becoming the authority in your own life and taking on the job of self-care and self-love.   This is true even if you aren’t recovering from religion.   Personal health and well-being, in other words, means that your inner “Adult” is tak

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Disney, the Creator, and Christ

By Carl S ~ I s Dumbo more real than Jesus? The answer depends on who you ask. Doesn't every culture have fantasy-fabricated individuals, often with lives of heroic proportions? Haven't celebrities with their real/imagined lives, been around forever? In the beginning, man created gods and keeps altering them. My oldest brother was an artist. He could paint a portrait of someone you'd know, and change the character of that person with a couple of brush-strokes, or make a sculpture of a figure and change its proportions daily, even hourly. He made figures out of Silly Putty, and watched each one as it changed form. Eventually each melted into a puddle. All gods are like that, because they're only as "real" as a person's imagination continues to create them, at whim. Humans need outlets for frustrations, anger, fear of the future and the unknown. Ergo, in the beginning, man created entertainment, Those seeking explanations for the origins of nature, death,