Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

My Exodus from Christianity

By Almost There ~

I have been through the most terrible, dreadful time of my life, emotionally, in the last few years so its kind of hard knowing where to start, there is so much to say I just want to scream everything out all at once but I will try to tell my story as best as I can.

My story first began not with doubt as such, but from the feeling of being hurt and confused. There were numerous times I felt a deep cut within myself wondering why would an all powerful, all present and all knowing God allow suffering in the world. Sounds like a simple enough question, but for a faithful Christian to have it is emotionally excruciatingly painful because there is no answer that will soothe the pain as they all fall short. Some Christians are afraid to ask it out of fear of being punished, so for a time I never verbalised the question, even to myself, even in my own head, I thought it but never really asked the question. I never had a fantastic life growing up, sure it was a decent life and I am grateful for many things, but having complications and challenges with one of my parents (an abusive childhood) caused me to always be on the edge. I became obsessed with being a perfectly good son and I didn’t even know it, I just wanted my parents to be proud of me and to think I was valuable, but that created a guilt complex in me, like everything I did could be done better, even when I achieved great things, the happy feeling lasted a moment and I was back to being obsessed. I also developed depression and OCD which was further prompted by my devout faith, always trying to do things right, never stepping out of line, and even when I did anything that every normal youngster does that is experimental or normal development, but that is wrong in the eyes of the church, I would beg for forgiveness and feel like the scum of the earth.

As you can imagine, having no constant person to turn to for help, I turned to God who was both my Creator and Friend, so I was taught. I became a devout Christian being baptized at 13. My mum taught me how to be faithful, good and moral, by taking me to church every Sunday, Tuesday and Wednesday , and that remaining faithful will have its rewards one day even if not in this life; she still believes this. My dad also went but hardly followed what we learnt there. Well, this went on for years, even until I finished high school all the while I still had these questions that I was too afraid to ask, when I saw babies being raped and killed, children dying of starvation, people of all races and religions going through good patches in their lives and then calamity befalling them, good or bad, Christian or unbeliever.

After Matric I felt a calling on my life to do more for God so I applied to join our church’s seminary. While there my questions became deeper, not at first about whether God exists but how unfair it was that one denomination believed that they were the only ones going to heaven and all other denominations of Christianity, as well as all other religions were going to hell. It just didn’t make any sense at all; I sometimes felt like we humans are more compassionate and loving than God who claimed to be LOVE Himself. I remember debating and arguing with lecturers and students on many occasions but I tried not to go too far out of fear of being expelled for being a liberal. I guess I comforted myself by telling myself that God takes care of the faithful, and punishes the wicked so as long as I stayed extremely faithful the bad would not befall me or my family. You know, the whole “ten thousand may fall, but it will not touch me” shit.

I must mention that before and during this time, my little niece and cousin lived with us and I grew very close to them as I love children; but having a guilt complex for everything good including feeling extreme love for family, I felt guilty for loving and was afraid that God would take away members of my family if he knew (or I verbalised) that I loved them so much or if I made it seem as if I put them before God. I’ve heard many sermons that clearly stated God will remove things which keep you away from Him or take His place in your life, and the wrathful actions of God documented in the Bible only proved this. I prayed that God would protect my family and I from harm especially the 2 children whom I loved so much.

The worst has already happened to us, twice; to put it bluntly – two dead children with no aid from the Creator, so why not go ahead and question.After 2 years, I returned home for the holidays and one of the major tragic events of my life occurred, my little niece was run over by a SUV and passed away. I was devastated, my family was devastated, our faith was severely shaken. My doubts and questions materialized in my very own life, right before my very eyes. Why didn’t God save her, she was only seven years old, what did she ever do wrong to deserve that; I couldn’t bear to imagine the fear she felt seeing that 4x4 SUV come toward her, the pain she felt being dragged and finally killed because her body was too damaged. I deluded myself for about 5 years after that thinking that an all loving God would probably take her soul out of her body right before the car hit so she wouldn’t feel the pain (how dumb), I recently started thinking but what about those children who are raped and survive but have to undergo surgery and have to live the rest of their lives scarred etc.; what is God’s problem, does he enjoy watching the suffering!? Is he entertained by it!?

That brings me to the year 2013, still struggling but attempting to remain a faithful servant and making up all kinds of excuses for God; my wife and I were expecting our second child and I was still suffering from a guilt complex, that I don’t really deserve good things and worried that anything good in my life can and will probably be taken away from me, so I prayed earnestly for the protection of my unborn child. Each visit to the Dr is a relief, watching her grow, hearing the Dr say she’s growing perfectly normal and healthy... and then the unthinkable happens, my wife doesn’t feel proper movements for almost 2 weeks, in which time she went into the maternity ward twice with the nurses confirming everything is fine; the third time that she goes in and our perfectly healthy baby who had less than a month to be born was confirmed to have passed away at 8 months in utero. They called it a “cord accident,” my child who was fully developed and healthy, was strangled to death by the umbilical cord. The hardest thing was to go through the whole delivery with my wife, only to hold a dead baby in our arms, her body so fragile, so injured from being deceased in the womb for about 4 days; just the thought of her being strangled to death is enough to make me go mad as I can’t imagine anyone at all, let alone anyone I love suffering or in pain. I keep thinking if she had been born a week earlier, everything would be okay, she would be here, my second child, my daughter.

This is where I started seriously questioning God. At first I was afraid that something further would happen, but my wife said something important, that yes “worse” can happen, but it would actually just be “more” that could happen because the worst has already happened to us, twice; to put it bluntly – two dead children with no aid from the Creator, so why not go ahead and question. My starting point was the bible itself, I sat down and finally read the whole book of Job to see if I could find some answers from God. All that it gave me was a confirmation of what I was afraid of, the God I served my whole life was an unjust psycho-maniac, power hungry blood thirsty monster. I started researching on Google, to see other people’s views on my concerns and that’s how I came across Ex-Christian, and started reading the many stories of hope after Christianity.

It is a saddening truth that in my case, it took tragedy to bring me to the light. As a Christian, one just remains blinded despite the suffering of humanity around the world. Christians hold on, as I did, to the selfish idea that I am more special and more important than the other people suffering in this world. And rightfully so, according to the bible, since it is logical that a Father takes care of and protects his family, so are Christians supposed to be protected by theirs.

Recently I have had such an array of feelings toward God and about God. These range from moments of madness where I feel absolute rage and anger, that if I could get my hands on God, I would kill him if I could for lying to me and humanity; to moments of absolute devastation at the loss of something so dear, so important to me. A God whom I have loved and cherished ever since I could remember, someone who promised to love me and protect me and my family. Someone who was there for me and helped me get through the most difficult times in my life but someone who has let me down, who has betrayed me in the worst possible ways. I realise that losing God and my religion and walking away from it is like losing a loved one, like walking away from a spouse who I found out has been unfaithful, but not only that, a spouse who also had a secret life of murdering innocent children and mass murdering entire civilizations, just because he can. Then I realise that I am angry at someone who doesn’t exist, I am angry at a deity created by human minds who were trying to explain the unexplainable but who’ve made a huge mess of it, maybe they even did it on purpose in order to trick people and control them. But that leaves me at a very difficult place, I have nowhere or no-one to direct my anger and emotions at. When I took my doubt and almost tangibly looked at it in my hands and started researching the actual truth and evidence, my faith became more and more shaky but now it has completely dissolved, I feel like its a paper burning in my hands and the wind is just blowing away all the ashes into the sky and its no longer there, there’s nothing to hold anymore. I guess I am just going through the grieving process, but it has been the first step in my healing, not only from the tragic losses in my life, but healing from everything that has kept me captive. I realise my life was devoted to this, and the road to healing is going to be a long one as I have many issues to resolve but I am happy to know that I am no longer serving and believing a lie and with this truth I can now deal with the various affairs of my life without the chains of religion. I am even exploring my traditional heritage, being an Indian South African, which as a Christian I could not do. I still do not believe in God, but the symbolism behind the mythology of Hinduism fascinates me, just as Greek and Egyptian mythology fascinated me in school. I can now explore these things, among others, just because I can, and that is refreshing.

I am not evil, I am not selfish, I am not guilty, I am not a worthless sinner, I have not fallen short of someone else’s glory, no god is going to give value to my existence because I am a beautiful creation on the evolutionary chain, I am a human being and I will not be made to feel guilty for being just that. I don’t know what exactly is out there, maybe angels, maybe spiritual beings, maybe forces of energy; if evolution could create such beautiful things, is it not possible for it to create beings with spirits/souls!? But I know one thing for sure, God is not out there, my ex-god YHWH has faded into mythology; and I am proud to be an atheist.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Thomas Jefferson, the First Amendment, and Why We Can't Stop Fighting About Religous Freedom

By Valerie Tarico ~

Thomas JeffersonIn 1878, the Supreme Court of the United States wrestled with a religious freedom case focused on Mormons and polygamy. In the written decision, Chief Justice Morrison Waite explained the court’s attempt to discern the intent of the First Amendment. He turned to someone who had been in the room when the Amendment was written—Thomas Jefferson:

Mr. Jefferson afterwards, in reply to an address to him by a committee of the Danbury Baptist Association (8 id. 113), took occasion to say: "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions,—I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties." (emphasis mine).

Waite took Jefferson’s words to be definitive: “Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured. Congress was deprived of all legislative power over mere opinion, but was left free to reach actions which were in violation of social duties or subversive of good order.”

In other words, the Constitution guarantees a right to religious opinion, not behavior, and specifically not behavior that violates civic responsibilities. Lest we think freedom of thought is too trivial to have been the concern of America’s founders, we need only look at how Muslim theocracies are attempting today to insert anti-blasphemy laws into the United Nations or how sanctions against blasphemers have recently been strengthened in places ranging from Russia to Pakistan to Ireland.

Based on this understanding of the U.S. Constitution, the Waite Court ruled that civil authorities had the right to regulate marriage, and that religious conscience claims offered no exemption. Twelve years later, bowing to legal and cultural pressures, the Latter Day Saints Church reversed its support for polygamy. But in the long run, neither Waite nor Jefferson himself has provided a satisfactory solution to American battles over religion in public life.

That is because the line between freedom of opinion and freedom of action is not nearly as clear as it sounds. As a psychologist, I would argue that belief dictates behavior, and strong belief is a strong dictator. If you step through my front door, how I respond depends on why I think you are there. If you come as a friend, I’m likely to be friendly. But if I believe strongly that you are there to rape and kill my daughter, I am likely to shoot you.

A sense of divine mission, if anything, lowers barriers between belief and behavior. Religious belief can be humble and hopeful, but often it is instead backed by righteous certitude that can trump social norms and even humanity’s deepest ethical intuitions.

I once wrote an article entitled, “Why Good Christians Do Bad Things to Win Converts.” The short answer to the title question is that religious beliefs can co-opt and redirect moral intuitions even in otherwise decent people. For example, earnest volunteer missionaries in Child Evangelism Fellowship feel driven to save kids from hell, and if this requires telling kindergartners they were born bad and deserve eternal torture, so be it. Hell-belief creates an imperative in which the end (salvation from torture) justifies deception, manipulation and fear induction. If I myself believed kindergarteners were slated for torture, I too might be willing to risk causing religious trauma syndrome.

Belief dictates behavior. It is impossible to disentangle creed and deed.

And so we are left with a tangle.

The dividing line drawn in the U.S. Constitution, clarified by Jefferson and reiterated by Waite, may allow civil law and religious pluralism to coexist, but it is inherently unsatisfying. It offers only the most abstract outline for addressing questions about religious freedom: yes to the right of individuals to formulate God and goodness according to the dictates of their own minds; yes to the right of the collective to constrain individual behavior for the sake of coherent civil society and the common good. From day one, lawmakers, the priesthood, corporate bodies, and individual citizens have been wrestling with how to make this work. And despite over 200 years of effort, we have failed to reach agreement on how to balance these competing demands.

The problem—Americans hate to admit this—is that we cannot have it all.

Pretending that we can grant deference to “sincerely held” religious belief while still sustaining a thriving pluralistic democracy—is an exercise in self-deception.By their very nature religions make truth claims and behavioral demands that are at odds with the goals and methods of civil society. Religion seeks to optimize wellbeing in some afterlife; civil society seeks to optimize wellbeing here on earth. Those two goals don’t always align. Religion asserts rules for living based on appeals to authority. Ideally, social science proposes rules for living based in evidence and reason.

To further complicate the matter, the truth claims and behavioral demands of many religions are mutually exclusive. Christianity alone has fragmented into over 34,000 different denominations and non-denominations because Christians disagree emphatically about God’s priorities and experience these differences as irreconcilable. And though Christianity in one form or another may be the majority spiritual worldview in America, it certainly isn’t the only one.

Our religious and spiritual differences put us at odds about the most sacred aspects of our lives: whether we bring a child into the world, how we view the moral standing of other species, who we are willing to kill, and how we die. Furthermore, sincerely held religious belief can oblige believers to control other people and religious institutions to control outsiders. When religious believers are prevented from acting on these obligations, they feel violated, even persecuted.

By definition, religious orthodoxy seeks conformity. This means that increasing one person’s religious freedom decreases the religious freedom of another. Giving religious rights to institutions limits the rights of individuals and vice versa.

Secular rules and responsibilities, including basic criminal codes and child protections, not infrequently countermand religious rules and responsibilities as understood by individual believers. American Evangelicals and conservative Catholics keep telling us this, loud and clear, and we should listen to them. Religion is whatever the believer says it is, and no secular or ecclesiastical authority has the power to say otherwise. Enabling a woman to prevent pregnancy, complying with anti-discrimination laws, stopping parents from whipping their children, allowing a cancer patient to manage his own dying process—these really do violate some people’s religions.

Pretending that this isn’t the case—pretending that we can grant deference to “sincerely held” religious belief while still sustaining a thriving pluralistic democracy—is an exercise in self-deception.

The best we can do is struggle to find balance points that respect individual autonomy while limiting the religious freedom to do harm to either America’s democracy or citizens. The First Amendment, as interpreted by Jefferson, grants our government broad latitude to promote the general welfare in cases where religion might dictate otherwise. The 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, basis for the recent Hobby Lobby case, reverses the order of priority, granting sincere believers exemption from otherwise universal responsibilities and rules. The Freedom From Religion Foundation, a church-state watchdog, is calling for legislation that would overturn RFRA altogether and revert to earlier standards, which are summarized in Ruth Ginsberg’s Hobby Lobby dissent. Constitutional scholars Marci Hamilton and Leslie Griffin instead propose congress should adopt 10 exemptions from the blanket privilege RFRA grants to believers. As they put it, “There are some actions no law should permit even if the person says he was acting out of religious motivation.” Their list includes child sex trafficking, terrorist acts, gender discrimination, housing discrimination, illegal drug use, endangering species at risk, and financial fraud but sidesteps current controversies like female genital mutilation and the right of religiously motivated parents to beat children or deny them education. Senators Mark Udall and Patty Murray introduced even narrower legislation to stop employers from interfering in an employee’s family planning decisions.

Regardless of how broad or narrow the constraints on religion may be—no matter how compelling the evidence that limiting a given religious behavior promotes public health, child wellbeing, human rights, tax fairness, broad sustainable prosperity, or global relations—lawmakers can be assured that some people of faith will resist. Their sincerely held beliefs oblige them to do so. Religions cannot self-regulate any more than corporations can. That is why it is up to those on the outside to make our own best judgments about what is real and right and to set limits that honor universal ethical principles and wellbeing.



Valerie Tarico is a psychologist and writer in Seattle, Washington. She is the author of Trusting Doubt: A Former Evangelical Looks at Old Beliefs in a New Light and Deas and Other Imaginings, and the founder of www.WisdomCommons.org. Subscribe to her articles at Awaypoint.Wordpress.com.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Someday

By Carl S ~

History. What place in history the present crisis in Iraq will occupy no one knows. The current conflict between the forces of ISIS and everyone else dominates. This is a religious war, as are the ongoing religious conflicts among the religious factions opposed to ISIS, whose aim is to return to an Islamic Caliph-dominated Middle East, this time dictated by Sharia law. Caliphs are history, their reigns abolished centuries ago. History. I came across a book review of “Delphi: A History of the Center of the Ancient World.” Delphi lasted for a thousand years, where rulers came for wisdom, to consult priestess-oracles on the future, and on the decisions they must make. Delphi celebrated its many gods, held athletic, music, painting, dance, and mime competitions; Delphi, with its over-adorned sanctuaries and wealth. What remains of Delphi? It is a tourist attraction in Greece, where perhaps others, as I, ponder the fact that one day it became “history.”

Consider the glory of ancient Egypt, with its kingdoms, its gods worshipped with faith passionate, and its doctrines of life after death. It too is gone as if it never was. What memorials it left standing for the ages are pyramids, which are tombs, built for many years by men and women who had better things to do, like spending their time in loving and taking care of each other and their children. For tombs? What are left are the end results of royalty and clergy leeching off the population. (As then, so it will be if and when the religious righteous in the Middle East and America get their way.) This is history, and in the whole scenario of time, it is vanity.

What of Nazi Germany and its “thousand year reign,” and the Soviet Union? What became of the Super Race, the New Soviet Man? Those were doctrinal revolutions driving nations to another type of Promised Land, blessed Paradise, their “priests” just as sure of themselves and dedicated as any religion-driven ideologues. Millions have died and suffered intolerable miseries for a promised earthly or heavenly future because of them and their followers. Yet still, the likes of ISIS, the Taliban, neo-Nazis, etc., etc., militate through whichever way they can. For what ends?

We are reminded of the comment in Ecclesiastes, “All is vanity.” We are reminded of the vanity of a belief in a divinely-endowed-human-centric-universe, where all that matters is us (or “Us,” as in “God’s Elected Ones”), and our goals. Such dogmatism is vanity. The vain ISIS are lying to themselves, as are the Taliban, those who fought Christian wars in Europe, and the religious “right” everywhere. The religious alone still stand amongst the destroyed ruins their predecessors have made, and still have not learned the lessons those ruins are shouting at them: Don’t do this again! And yet they keep trying to force “the will and the glory of God” on others, even if that ”glory” comes of bloodshed. Yet all is vanity, because glory does not last and never did. And how many have suffered and will continue to suffer because of their vanity?

At the end of humanity’s rainbow is not a paradise or spiritual pot of gold, but the continual history of the ordinary and mundane, the tears, joys, caring, disappointments, love gained and lost, things to be enthused about: the everyday life of ordinary people, that persists through and survives ideologies, greed, persecution and disasters. This is not vanity; this is reality.

Someday, people will say, “What was the big deal about Christianity?” Someday, people will openly ask, “What was the big deal about Islam?” Past gods have become superstitious shadows, their temples returning to the dust from which they came. So shall one more god, with priests and dogmas, also be discredited, shown to be nothing but vanity. Already this is happening. Meanwhile, we have to deal with the blissfully-insistent-ignorance of those who refuse to learn, but especially so, for those who will not learn: “Don’t do that again!”

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Hearing the Still Small Voice of Reason.

By Carolyn Hyppolite ~

There was never a time when the question of God was not important in my life. As a child, I was disinclined to believe. I was appalled by the story of the testing of Abraham—God tests Abraham by asking him to sacrifice his son. I was eleven years old when I read that story and I decided that this was the kind of deity that I should stay away from.

Despite my natural skepticism, there is another part of me that has found something appealing in the Christian story. At its best, it is a story about sacrificial love and the restoration of a broken world into something whole, just and beautiful. Perhaps, all of us can find some attractiveness in such ideals.

In 2005, I had what I believed to be an encounter with the divine—a calling from God. I fell in love with Jesus. It transformed me radically. I became a zealous and conservative Christian. From that day, everything in my life had religious significance. I became obsessed with what God’s plans were for my professional life; I was only open to dating the most devout of men; I prayed constantly; I looked for His hand in everything.

Yet, all was not well in Christian paradise. For despite my love affair with God, there were always questions and problems that nagged me—matters about the world, the Bible and my personal experiences that seemed contrary with the existence of an omnipotent, loving and intervening deity. God as preached was often far different than God as experienced.

I believed that God was all-powerful and all-loving and yet, before me stood a cruel world brimming with tragedy, injustice and often, futility. And when I was honest with myself, I could see no evidence that God was acting in any way to infuse order and goodness into his creation. The cross? No, that would not do .Jesus’s rough weekend is too small when weighted against injustice and suffering he permits. He died for our sins? Is that not the least he could do?

Then there was the Bible. What was I do with all the untruths, violence, misogyny, and gross immorality? How was I suppose relate to this petty, pompous, petulant, and pitiless deity?

I would not have put it so bluntly last year. In fact, last year, I was organizing street evangelism for my Church. The flaws in the Bible and in its protagonist were facts that I tried to explain away. They were questions to ponder; doubts to be prayed over; mysteries to be left to the wisdom of God.

But there times when they was no denying that the text I claimed to be inspired by a good deity was deeply ethically challenged. For example, I used to read the Psalms every morning and one morning, as I was reading the 135th psalm, I became struck by moral myopia of the Scripture writer:

Praise the Lord, for the Lord is good;
sing to his name, for he is gracious.
For the Lord has chosen Jacob for himself,
Israel as his own possession (3-4, NRSV)

He it was who struck down the firstborn of Egypt,
both human beings and animals;
he sent signs and wonders
into your midst, O Egypt,
against Pharaoh and all his servants.
He struck down many nations
and killed mighty kings—
Sihon, king of the Amorites,
and Og, king of Bashan,
and all the kingdoms of Canaan—
and gave their land as a heritage,
a heritage to his people Israel. (8-12, NRSV)

That is not good if you happen to be an Amorite, I said to myself. I had read this psalm about once a month for several years. But that morning, I read it as if I had never read it before. I saw it for what it was—the ethnocentric war chant of a tribal people cloaking their mythic imperialist history with the robe of divine sanction. God was not good; just the God of Israel.

That was not the day I walked away. It would take me many such moments of cognitive dissonance to realize that the silent wall that I prayed before was nothing but a cold, silent wall.

My story, which I recount in my book, Still Small Voices, is one persevering as the mountain of contrary evidence threatened to drown me in cognitive dissonance.

When I would inevitably stumble upon the Bible’s falsehoods, violence, sexism and immorality, I resisted the more obvious conclusion—that it is the product of flawed, ancient, tribal peoples. Instead, I convinced myself that there was some perfectly rational explanation for all disturbing passages (or worst I occasionally denied that they were morally problematic at all), and that I would endeavor to discover said explanations. To that end, I asked all I could, read all I could, studied Latin, Biblical Greek and Hebrew, and enrolled in a Master’s in Biblical Studies Program.

However, none of this brought me any closer to any resolutions or inner peace. In fact, the more I learned about the Bible, its sources, compositions and contradictions, its textual variants and the Church that produced and promulgated it, the more difficult it became to believe.

Of course, all of this was happening as I tried to have a personal relationship with an invisible, silent and unresponsive being. Prayer proved no more effective at resolving my cognitive dissonance than study. When I asked God to help me understand these things, I heard nothing but silence. When I asked God to intervene in my personal life, he was equally absent.

This. The silent, absent God in my own life made an intellectual question—the problem of evil—a very personal one. You must not misunderstand. I live a fairly decent life. However, it did dawn on me one day that I had been both foolish and arrogant to imagine that there is a God who would listen to my relatively minor supplications when he clearly has and continues to ignore the much more dire pleas of so many billions.

But if God does not answer prayer, if he not did inspire the Bible, if this was the only life I had to live, what had I been doing with myself? I had tragically spent some of the best years of my life chasing an illusion.

I became angry; not just over my own finite wasted time but over the wasted time of all of humanity. I became angry over all the health care debate hours wasted arguing over how the invisible man in the sky wants us to use our genitals; all the brilliant minds devoted to deciphering some relevance from antiquated ancient texts; all the material resources directed towards cathedrals; and of course angry over that most precious of finite resources—time; all the wasted, finite human time.

http://stillsmallvoices.net/

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Shame on you, GOD!

By ijustwanttobeyourfriend! ~

What would you think of a father who could help his child as he/she is drowning but just watches and does nothing? What would you think of a father who watched his son/daughter get raped, tortured, and murdered, and have all the ability to to intervene, but instead just watches and cries and says, "I love you, I'm sorry"?

father and son
father and son (Photo credit: disgustipado)
God is "Our Father" and he can help all these people. He's extremely wealthy, extremely strong, and all-knowing, yet refuses to even answer my simple questions for instruction on what to do with my life and who to trust.

All I'm asking is that he would direct me and give me some instruction. I dont want it to come from a book. I want it to come from a Father/Mother/God.

God gives us free will? He doesn't want robots? If he guides me and answers some questions and simply tells that child "don't get in the car with that serial killer", that is not a violation of free will. That would put me at ease.

Ted Bundy and other serial killers would create a cast around their arm or leg or pretend to be injured. Find a kind soul that would get them to help with whatever and get in the car and they would be taken out in the middle of nowhere to be humiliated, tortured, raped, terrorized, and murdered.

If God loves those victims he could have simply told them, "this man doesnt need help, he's a con artist". An act of kindness and charity cost these people their lives!!

Serial Victims were often the kindest and sweetest people. People that would get into the vehicle of some "poor injured person" and be transported wherever to help him move whatever...and that is what they get?!? A humiliating inhumane death, no burial, abuse of a corpse,...all for an act of kindness?

A father who just watches and cries and doesn't speak up? Not a responsible father at all!

Saturday, July 19, 2014

If You Don’t Believe

By Carl S ~

American linguist Noam Chomsky once remarked,
 “If you don’t believe in free speech for those you despise, then you don’t believe in free speech.” 
This would also apply to beliefs themselves. Do Christians really believe in freedoms of speech/religion, using this obvious common sense? I would reply with a resounding NO; that although the majority of them may profess tolerance, the difference is in degree. They all are intolerant, not only the extremists.

What do we mean when we say “religion?” Obviously, the word so often used as synonymous with morality is propaganda. One can and does have morality without religion, and vice versa. Nevertheless, in spite of their contradictions and multitudinous sects, religions hold themselves up as something we should all respect unquestioningly. But, really, why? None of them is based on provable facts, and faiths=superstitions. (Oh yes, it is that simple.) Why then should religions be entitled to special preferential exemptions from laws everyone must abide by, including tax exemptions? Why should any religions which gain power be permitted to persecute, imprison, even kill innocent people simply because those people have different opinions about the existence of the supernatural, and they don’t agree to lie about it? What insanity is this?

What can religion mean, when it means so many different things to so many different people? The American Heritage Dictionary defines “religion” as,
 “(a.) belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator or governor of the universe; (b.) a personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief.” 
Note that the word “belief” is what’s important here; not because the belief is true or not. (In fact, many arguments have been made defending beliefs as valid BECAUSE they cannot be proven to be true.) The logical and legal position ought to be that superstitions should be recognized for what they are, regardless of the intensity of personal emotional involvement or institutionalized back-up. Even if a nation’s legislators believe that the act of believing confers on them respect (and isn’t that the purpose of religions, to confer special privileges on their believers?) over anyone else who may believe very differently or not at all, and who are not afraid of reality?

Let’s put freedom of speech/religion to the test. Let’s play the same hand as the Dogma of Christianity deals out daily, even hourly, internationally. Satanism, according to Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, qualifies as religion by virtue of beliefs in supernatural powers governing the universe. The Satanic Church also qualifies as an institutionalized system grounded in such a belief. In fact, many belief systems qualify as religions, with their beliefs in supernatural powers, including voodoo and the Wiccan religion. Pick and choose your own “supernatural reality” and call it reality. Millions have done so in every religion. Nothing HAS to be true/provable by evidence. Anything goes when it comes to the supernatural of the ghost worlds.

So here is a modest proposal, based on freedom of religion and freedom of speech: since the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of sectarian prayers opening public government assemblies, then clergymen from the Church of Satan ought to pray to the supernatural power of Satan to benefit the proceedings which follow. They have the legal right, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution, to do so. Supposedly, the reason for sectarian prayers, outside of the “tradition” argument, (don’t forget that slavery was tradition also) is to call for supernatural guidance and protection from harm. Interestingly, that tradition has been predominantly addressed to the Christian god. Guidance? Protection? Praying to Satan? Think about this though: Could any supernatural agent do more evil than a god who does NOT warn young men NOT to listen to the likes of G. W. Bush, who grotesquely and habitually deceived them into going to war in Iraq and dying because of his decisions? And wasn’t the same god involved who allowed the German people to be deceived, to the destruction of millions of lives?

Doesn’t it make sense for Christians in free countries to put their proverbial money where their mouth is? After the outrage of “permitting” these freedoms of speech/religion tapers off, wouldn’t we be expected to see the offended believers try to rationalize the Satan-clergyman’s prayer as “He’s only pretending. He doesn’t really believe what he’s saying.” If actions do speak louder than words, wouldn’t that reaction itself be just one more definition of religion?

How God's Light Blinded Me

By Mason Torrey ~

How God's Light Blinded Me
After 32 years of being a dedicated Christian, Mason Torrey stumbles across difficult logic and faces the hardest decision of his life.

"When you look head on into a light source, you become blind to everything around you."

This book documents the first 32 years of Torrey's life as a dedicated Christian. Unwavering in his faith, nothing could take away his faith in God. Throughout the years, he faces challenges, heartbreak, fear, guilt and determination, none of which could rock his solid foundation in the Truth - God's Word. One day in December 2013, it all changed.

Torrey has made his story is available as an e-book. He invites everyone to download it for free here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/456177.

Website: http://www.solidatheist.com

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Dear Christian, You May Think You Understand Me, But You Don’t

By Tim Wolf ~

After a long period of growing doubts about my Christian faith, I realized a few years ago that I had become a non-believer. Yes, I’m an atheist. Since that realization, I’ve begun the process of coming out, first mostly online, but more recently to most of my friends and family. I often point out that my deconversion process began back in the late 1990’s when I decided to read the entire Bible and study all of those chapters in the Old Testament that I knew very little about. And so during that time I began taking some graduate level Bible and Theology courses and I read the entire Bible twice. When I discuss this with Christians today, the same erroneous statements and accusations are tossed at me in knee-jerk fashion. I would like to address some of these here. The following are a few of the common Christian responses to my deconversion:

You had already decided you didn’t believe and just read the entire Bible looking for passages to back up your atheism.

This could not be further from the truth. At the time I began this period of intense Bible study, I had already decided to leave my engineering career and become a missionary in Eastern Europe. I was engaged in a lengthy process of being accepted as a missionary through Greater Europe Mission. At the same time I was working toward obtaining a Master of Arts in Theology through a conservative seminary that offered coursework both online and through a series of seminars. They weren’t handing out paper degrees, the work was very challenging. I was also teaching Sunday School at a Baptist Church in Illinois and was encourage when I was offered a class that had dwindled to a few regulars and began to build back up in numbers when I took the class.

So when I began my this period of intense Bible study, I was at the peak of my faith in Christianity. I was so sure about my faith, that I was fully prepared to give up a comfortable lifestyle and move to an impoverished area of eastern Europe to spread the good news. In order to make such a huge, life-changing decision, I was in a place where I both believed in and trusted God whole-heartedly.

Your heart was closed to God and you read the Bible. If your heart had been open to His love, He would have revealed Himself to you.

I was at the peak of my faith in Christianity. I was so sure about my faith, that I was fully prepared to give up a comfortable lifestyle and move to an impoverished area of eastern Europe to spread the good news.This is the kind of thing I would have said twenty years ago when facing a non-believer. I would have said this based on a lot of time I had spent studying the New Testament. But as I began to thoroughly study the Old Testament, try as I might, a loving God was not jumping off the pages and begging to enter my heart. As I studied page after page of arcane rituals, suffering and genocide, rape and incest, and stories that frankly just came across as complete fiction; more and more doubts began to creep into my heart and mind. I truly believed that my faith in Christ would grow with each day I studied God’s Word in the Old Testament. But what I found was simply bizarre and irreconcilable with the New Testament Christianity I was practicing. And I did not read the Old Testament once during this time, I read it twice. My faith in the Bible being the inerrant Word of God was shaken. And yet it was still ten more years after this before I realized I was a non-believer. I began my Old Testament study with a fully open heart and mind expecting to grow in my knowledge of God. Instead I found nagging doubts in the pages of the Old Testament.

You just became an atheist because you love your sin too much.

I even heard Sye Ten Bruggencate say something like this in his recent debate with Matt Dillahunty. This is such a ridiculous assertion. First of all is presupposes that morality comes from an invisible god and not from the individual. This fallacy is addressed by many counter-apologists who are better at these arguments than me. But from my own experience, it’s just a laughable premise. First of all, I didn’t choose to longer believe in God. Belief is not a choice. If as Sye suggests, I really do believe in God deep down; would I pretend not to believe so I could freely gossip about my neighbors even though deep down I knew that sin could lead me to eternal hellfire? And if belief is a choice, can I choose not to believe in the police department and rob banks with impunity? Am I willing to fool myself in this manner? The entire argument is just childish.

Having been an atheist for years, I cannot think of a single thing I do now that would be considered “sinful” that I didn’t do as a believer. Sure there are things that I no longer do like tithe and go to church and pray and study the Bible. But none of these things contributed in even the slightest way to my deconversion process. For me the journey from belief to non-belief was an intellectual exercise. This “you love sin” argument is like kids calling each other names on the playground.

As annoying as these Christian accusations can be, I do think it is worthwhile to address them. I used to believe these things of atheists back when I was a believer. And today I have come to realize the fallacy of these accusations. So I believe we should be open to other believers coming to the same realizations. Especially on a website like this one where many people who are just exploring their own doubts are quietly reading these pages and have not yet felt comfortable expressing their doubts aloud.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Letting Go of Jesus and Erin

By Tania ~

The time has come to say another “goodbye.”

The door has closed. I don't know if it will open again. If it will, my guess is that it won't be anytime soon.

I've grieved. I'm not sure I'll ever be completely “done” grieving, because the sadness runs a bit too deep. I loved a lot, and I cared a lot, and now it's time for goodbye.

I've cried, and screamed. I've talked, I've exhausted myself with the talking. I've tried to push the sad and angry thoughts aside, but I also need and want to face them, embrace them, not just ignore something so precious as these things that make us feel, that make us real, that show we're not robots.

I went to the cemetery a while ago. I had some flowers, and I left them at the grave of someone I don't know. It was a symbol – this time of walking and reflecting, of realizing that something special is gone. A closure, a small attempt to somehow try to connect what once was to what is no longer, to appreciate that life is now different, to see the beauty and possibility in it.

This loss was the loss of a friendship – a close friend of over ten years has decided for any number of reasons that she no longer wants to be my friend. There was the misunderstanding, the attempt to explain things over and over, the times of silence, the smalltalk, the attempt to go back to “how we were,” the emails and the phone calls, the relief that we were back to “how we were,” and then the realization that things were not in fact back to normal. There were the tears, the harsh words, another explanation...and the “Okay...well...we'll be in touch when we're in touch.” The implied ending - the words, the tone, the sigh, that for now, there is nothing to do but gently close that door.

It seems, sometimes, to be one loss too many. A few years ago, I started closing the door on Christianity - sometimes it seems to take its time to close a door. I'd waited at the kitchen table for long enough. There had been enough cups of tea, enough racking things over in my head, enough prayers whispered and screamed and written. The silence overwhelmed. I can deal with the talking, the disagreements, the confusion...but the silence overwhelms, the goodbyes – spoken or unspoken – overwhelm.

The sadness still runs deep. There are the jokes, the comments about the absurdity of it all, the feeling of liberation, the open-mindedness...but the sadness is still there. My heart breaks as I drive by a church parking lot that is full..and I am reminded of what I had but no longer have. My heart breaks as I go through a pile of CD's and see these reminders of the God and the Jesus to whom I was so close at one time, but whom I cannot even believe in anymore. I've slowly replaced my worship books and sheet music with other music, but I can't quite bear to let go of all of it. I hear the other people praise the Lord, and pray, and talk of His goodness and His grace, and I wish I could be one of those people, but I'm not – and I miss that. Despite all the things that have changed and how I've met wonderful “non-believers” and grown as an individual and moved on in many ways, my heart still aches a bit for all of it.

I've heard that we're not supposed to make our memories bigger than our dreams. I like that, but I still struggle with it. I love what Christianity was to me. A part of me will probably always smile when I think of Sunday School, youth group, sitting at my kitchen table and feeling so “enriched” by all things God and the Bible, being so “connected” to the Spirit, being overwhelmed by God's blessings. And a part of me will probably always smile when I think of my friendship that is no more – long drives, talks on the wharf, picnics at the beach, sleepovers, Starbucks, long phone calls when we lived far apart, photo shoots in autumn, driving to nearby cities and staying in a hotel for fun, meaningful gifts at Christmas and birthdays, fall fairs....

I am reminded that we hold all these things – the times, the people, the feelings – with us. They have gone, but they're a part of who we are. Life happens, we change, reality hits - sometimes it hits just way too damn hard.

A lump forms in my throat and tears come to my eyes, and I allow it. I'm grieving, and it hurts, but it's necessary. Time will pass, and the things of the past will be replaced, to some degree at least, by other things. The sadness will likely always be there, but it won't always be so close to the surface.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Who Needs Gospels?

By Carl S. ~

As a child, I was fascinated by the “Miracles of the loaves and fishes.” As an adult, I find the “miracles” interesting. Consider the times in which they happened: the Romans dominated over the Jewish people, the Roman Empire was vast. Any and all unusual news would spread like wildfire. The first miracle, as recounted, is a report of a man who fed five thousand men alone, not counting the women and children, on this repast. Not just once, either; in a repeat performance, he fed four thousand-plus people. That’s a hell of a lot of people. You can imagine how fast the news would have gotten around. Free food!

Okay, so the Romans had spies among the Jews; for sure, you know, worries about rebellions and all that. And let’s not forget the historians at the time: Jewish, Greek, Roman. Events such as these would be news, big time. So, in actuality, the Gospel accounts should be unnecessary.

And can‘t you just see the Roman equivalent of a minister of agriculture racing into Caesar’s presence to proclaim, “There‘s a Jew out there who’s feeding around ten thousand with a few loaves of bread and a few fishes. And he has baskets filled with leftovers. And he changes water into wine!” And Caesar would answer, “Hire that man!!!”

But Wait. There's more. This makes sense: the great physicians have a meeting with Caesar. And they say, “Our Roman and Greek and Jewish colleagues in Rome and Galilee are up in arms because of this Jesus who is curing cripples, eliminating blindness, deafness, and boils, and restoring sanity to the mentally ill. Why, one of your own Centurions is telling everyone how this man brought his daughter back from the dead! This miracle worker spends entire days in curing! If this keeps up, we will all be out of business.” To which Caesar replies, “Bring in those he is reported to have cured. There must hundreds by now, then shall I hire him and he will teach his healing, or tricks, to all physicians so that the entire empire shall prosper. And I shall write of all these things in my memoirs.”

As a child, I was fascinated by the “Miracles of the loaves and fishes.” As an adult, I find the “miracles” interesting. “But there is a catch to allowing him to teach us,” say the physicians. “He is using his powers to preach a new version of Judaism, one which teaches people to sell everything they have and give the money to the poor, to trust in their god to provide for their needs exclusively, and to nevertheless keep paying taxes to Caesar from what money they do have. Although, he does say his kingdom is not of this world.”

“No problem there, says Caesar. “No threat to me. And the less Rome has to pay to provide services, the better for Rome. What are we waiting for? And what’s the problem with yet one more religion? Rome welcomes them all. Whatever he’s selling is probably being bought. Hell, if he’s that good, I myself might be tempted to join with him. Together, we could save the world!”

To give you an idea of the impact an actual historically authenticated miracle such as feeding thousands would have in Roman times, you only have to compare it to something in our own. Supposing you’re researching UFOs on the Web, and you read: “Two days ago, a flying saucer miraculously landed in a suburb of New York City, and several aliens exited it, distributing food to thousands.” Of course, you turn on the news networks for verification. No mention. You check out the newspapers, especially those in New York. Nothing. Wouldn’t you question the truthfulness of the source, the tellers? (Some wouldn't, if it's a miracle-matter of ”faith.”)

Are “miracles” proof that the Gospel writers are telling the truth, as they say, telling you to take their word for them on faith? Are they just conning you? If they do so with an obvious lie as the loaves and fishes tale, what about the whopper about a resurrected man? Just because that “miracle” tells many what they want to hear, is the story any less false?

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Ten Commandments That Would Have Changed the World

By Valerie Tarico ~

Ten CommandmentsThe American Bible Society funds an annual “State of the Bible” survey, and this spring the Christian Post cheered some of their findings: “The Bible continues to dominate both mind space and book retail space as America's undisputed best-seller.” According to the study, conducted by Barna, over 88 percent of American homes contain a Bible. In fact, the average is 4.7 copies per household.

Now, I should note that a young non-religious friend once came home from school with a bright green Gideon’s New Testament that she later touted as a reserve of fine rolling papers, which may explain why the household average isn’t a solid 5.

But most Americans treat the Bible with some degree of deference.

Among adults who responded to the survey, 56% were classified as “pro-Bible” meaning they think it is the actual or inspired word of God with no errors. More than a quarter said that they read from the Good Book daily or at least several times a week. Fully half said the Bible contains everything a person needs to know to lead a meaningful life.

Surveys about religious behavior and belief are highly susceptible to social desirability bias, meaning the very human tendency to tell researchers want we think they want to hear and to polish our self-image a little.Survey responses are selfies with mood lighting and make-up.

Even so, it’s hard to dispute the fact that the Bible has an enormous influence on our society, not only American society in 2014, but Western society going way back.

That’s what makes all of the pages devoted to useless things like tribal spats, genealogies, rules for slaveholders, menstrual rituals, misogynist trash talk, and loquacious donkeys such a wasted opportunity. But even that would be less painful if core moral mandates like the Ten Commandments were of higher caliber.

Secularists had a good laugh a few years back, when Stephen Colbert nailed Georgia Representative Lynn Westmoreland, who had co-sponsored a bill requiring display of the Ten Commandments in the House and Senate chambers. “What are the Ten Commandments?” asked Colbert. Westmoreland came up with three.

In the darkest part of my heart I hope the esteemed congressman from Georgia spends the rest of his life wearing a scarlet H for hypocrite, even if no one can see it but him. But the truth is, very few Christians know the Ten Commandments from memory, for two very good reasons.

One reason is that the Bible actually gives two different sets of Ten Commandments, and they don’t match. In Exodus 20, Moses comes down from Mount Sinai with a set of stone tablets. (This is the most popular version.) Then he gets mad and smashes them and has to go back up and get another set. And God says, “Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest.” (Exodus 34:1). But then, apparently, God can’t resist tweaking them a little. Ok, a lot.

Here, from the perennially popular King James Version, is the Exodus 20 set:

Ten Commandments From Exodus 20

  1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
  2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.
  3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
  4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
  5. Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
  6. Thou shalt not kill.
  7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
  8. Thou shalt not steal.
  9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
  10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
And here, from Exodus 34, is the set with which God replaced them:

10 Commandments From Exodus 34

  1. Thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
  2. Thou shalt make thee no molten gods.
  3. The feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep.
  4. All that openeth the matrix is mine; and every firstling among thy cattle, whether ox or sheep, that is male.
  5. Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest.
  6. Thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year's end.
  7. Thou shalt not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven.
  8. Neither shall the sacrifice of the feast of the passover be left unto the morning.
  9. The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring unto the house of the Lord thy God.
  10. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk.
Setting aside the fact that females are relegated to a list of possessions that includes oxen, cattle and slaves; it’s not hard to see why the shattered set has the broader appeal. (In fact, it appears they have had broader appeal for a long time; they are repeated, approximately, in the book of Deuteronomy.)

But seriously, the second reason few Christians have memorized the Ten Commandments is that even the popular set lacks the moral clarity and relevance of, say, the Golden Rule or All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.

Think about what you’ve just read. Now imagine for a moment that you are a perfectly Good and All-Knowing Being. Imagine that your core attributes include love, truth, justice and mercy. Imagine that the qualities you want to spread in humankind are love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness and kindness—what the writer of Galatians called the “fruit of the Spirit.” Imagine that what you most want is for people to fulfill two “Great Commandments”—to love you and to love their neighbors as themselves—and that, as the writer of Matthew said, anything else you tell them is just a way to get there. Imagine that you are going to take one shot—well, ok, two—at dictating Ten Commandments that will be timeless and universally relevant, literally and metaphorically written in stone.

56% of American adults say the Bible is the actual or inspired word of God with no errors.You get where I’m going. With a little help from his weed, Bob Marley could have done better.

For two millennia, or maybe three if the Old Testament stories are rooted in history, people who sincerely believe the Ten Commandments to be the apogee of divine guidance have been doing things like pillaging, slaughtering other species, burning books and witches and infidels, owning sex slaves, beating children, conquering heathens, and generally deciding who counts and who doesn’t based on gender hierarchy, religion, and tribal boundaries. Imagine how radically different Western history might have been if the Ten Commandments went something like this:

  1. This above all shall ye take as my first command: Thou shalt treat living beings as they want to be treated. And the second commandment is like unto it:
  2. In as much as be possible, thou shalt avoid afflicting pain or sorrow, which shall be unto thee my signs of ill and evil.
  3. Thou shalt honor and protect all of creation, for I the LORD have created it that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
  4. Thou shalt have sexual relations with neither human nor beast who chooseth not freely what pleasures thou mayest offer.
  5. Thou shalt not beat the child, but by admonition and instruction with kindness shall teach both wisdom and skill.
  6. Thou shalt do unto members of other religions and tribes as thou dost unto thine own.
  7. I, the LORD your God, forbid thee to own other persons be they woman, man or child; neither shall ye subject any gender nor race one to another, but shall honor my image in all.
  8. Thou shalt not destroy the lands of thine enemies, nor poison their well, nor salt their earth, neither shalt thou cut their shade tree nor burn their vineyard, nor wantonly slaughter the beast of their field.
  9. Thou shalt wash thy hands before eating and shalt boil the drinking water that has been defiled by man or beast.
  10. Thou shalt ask the questions that can show thee wrong, so that through the toil of many, from generation unto generation, ye may come to discover the great I AM.
This list of Ten Commandments would have changed the course of history. Think Crusades, or the Inquisition, or Salem, or the American Holocaust, or the slave trade, or Northern Ireland, or the Iraq War.

It would have changed history despite the fact that it is seriously flawed. Some points are redundant. Important concepts are missing. The thoughtful reader will immediately notice gaps or think of improvements. And that, precisely, is my point. People with their brains engaged and moral intuitions intact can do better.

The 56 percent of Americans who think the Bible is “the actual or inspired word of God with no errors” are stuck, anchored to the Iron Age. Many, when they get trapped by the ugly contradictions inherent in this position, do whatever moral gymnastics are necessary to defend the Book.

I once listened in amazement as an elderly pair of sweet and pacifist Jehovah’s Witnesses tried to justify the child-slaughters perpetrated in the Old Testament by the Chosen People: The Israelites had to kill the other Palestinian villagers. They were so evil they practiced child sacrifice—they were the first abortionists, don’t you know! And once the parents were dead it was simply a mercy to kill their children as well.

Whew. Try to wrap your brain around that one.

I said at the beginning of this article that the State of the Bible survey this year published some numbers that Bible believers find reassuring. Fortunately, that wasn’t all the news. Between 2011 and 2013, the percent of American adults who believe the Bible is “just another book of teachings written by men that contains stories and advice" has almost doubled, from 10 to 19 percent. And the shift is being driven by Millennials.

There’s hope for us yet.

Valerie Tarico is a psychologist and writer in Seattle, Washington. She is the author of Trusting Doubt: A Former Evangelical Looks at Old Beliefs in a New Light and Deas and Other Imaginings, and the founder of www.WisdomCommons.org. Subscribe to her articles at Awaypoint.Wordpress.com.

Related:

If the Bible Were Law, Would You Qualify for the Death Penalty?

Eleven Kinds of Verses Bible-Believers Like to Ignore

What the Bible Says About Rape and Rape Babies

15 Bible Texts Reveal Why “God’s Own Party” is at War with Women

Captive Virgins, Polygamy, Sex Slaves: What Marriage Would Look Like if We Actually Followed the Bible

Why Catholics Are Going Straight To Hell

By Jo Parker ~

When I was young, my mother hammered into me her belief that Catholics were not real Christians. I was not allowed to play with children from non-Christian families. I lived in a protected bubble. I was rarely exposed to anything that would cause questions to arise concerning differing belief systems.

A Catholic family with five children lived two doors down, and I was not allowed to go to their house.I attempted to explain to my mother that they were like us. They had a cross on their wall. The girl, who was two years older than me, had told me she was a Christian. I was age 4 or 5 when my mother began to explain it to me, in simple terms at first: Catholics are idolaters because they worship graven images and pray to dead human beings, like Mary. She later pointed out that the children down the street celebrated Satan's holiday, Halloween.This notion was difficult to buy into beyond the age of 7. Halloween looked like a lot of fun. By that age, I was enrolled in a Baptist school, and most of the other students got to dress up in costumes and eat candy. I was told they were probably going to hell, too. As I aged, I began to notice that we were the exception when it came to Halloween, even among other Christians.

There were other things about my early upbringing, which I later discovered were not only strict and unfair- they were abnormal. I was not allowed to watch television. I was not allowed to watch Disney movies with magic. I was not allowed to play with Barbies. I was not allowed to eat sugar. I was not allowed to wear shirts with any writing or unknown symbols on them, with the exception of the names of family vacation destinations. I was not allowed to wear certain brand names. Osh Kosh B'Gosh was a popular baby and children's brand in the early to mid-1980's. My mother said that the word "Gosh" stood for"God", and that the clothing designers were taking his name in vain. Most oddly, I was not allowed to listen to contemporary Christian music, and especially not Christian rock. She explained that these artists were mimicking worldly,Satanic music. This made it as bad or worse than secular rock music, because unsuspecting,spiritually vulnerable Christians were open for spiritual attack more so when listening to the Christian stuff. I think that was the full explanation, but I'm not sure. To be honest, I did not understand the rationale back then, and I do not know how to replicate it more fairly as an adult from her bizarre perspective.

My mother once slipped in a weak moment and took me to see a theatrical revival of Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarves when I was five years old. I don't remember much about the event, except that she cried and apologized to me the whole ride home, swearing to never expose me to that kind of evil again. I attempted to console her. I think I had a good time, and I did not understand why she was so upset. She told me that she had failed as my mother, and that whether I understood or not, it was a demonic film. It probably is no coincidence that I love Classic Disney films to this day. Even though I never cared much for Snow White, it's the first Disney DVD I purchased as an adult.

When I was 7, my mother had another lapse in judgment, this time allowing me to play with the Catholics a few times. Their family was extremely well off financially, and they had more toys than they knew what to do with. I was playing with the girl who was my age one day when I told her I wasn't allowed to have Barbies. Truthfully, even at that age, I hated dolls. I think the only reason I had any interest whatsoever is because they were so forbidden. I had stuffed animals, but no dolls, and I preferred playing outside with boys. That day, the Catholic girl gave me one of her Skipper dolls. I remember the feeling I felt: there was definitive guilt present, but there was something more powerful. I got high that day, and I do mean HIGH. I was full of adrenaline, and I felt a tingling sensation all over my body when I sneaked that doll into my house. Once I had her in my room, I didn't know what to do. My mom was a serious control freak and micro-manager. I had been responsible for cleaning my own room and making my bed from the age of 3. In spite of that, I did not know how I was going to hide it from her. She was into everything. I found a shoe box, put the doll in the box, and put it on the highest shelf in my closet, careful to stack other things on top of it. For two weeks, I was afraid to go near my closet. I'd rather not delve too deeply into it,but my mom was a strict disciplinarian. I was terrified of being caught. I was not having any fun with the doll either, and the high I felt that first day left. All that remained was guilt, shame,frustration, and obsession. After two weeks, I could not take it any longer. I picked what I thought to be a good time, and I collected the doll from her hiding place, just to catch a glimpse. My memory about the rest is fuzzy, but I think it was my two-year old sister who came into the room and saw the doll. I am not sure how she managed to tell on me at the age of two, but she was always an overachiever and a traitor. My mother confronted me in my bedroom. I can still visualize her in front of me, holding the Skipper. I remember thinking, based by her reaction, that this was the worst thing I had ever done in my life. I thought my life was over. It may have been over for awhile; I do not remember. I know there was a physical punishment. That was standard and happened daily in my early years. Whether it was a look I supposedly gave her, or I didn't complete a chore to her satisfaction, I distinctly remember knowing that I was a total screw-up who could not do anything right.

It was that same year that I began to take the issue of religious faith more seriously. I was given the impression by my parents and my church that I didn't have to make up my mind about god when I was young. In the faith of my youth, they taught that us that someone had to be old enough to comprehend and reason in order to choose salvation.. Young children would not go to hell when they died,supposedly. But I began to get the distinct feeling by the age of 7 that fun times were over. It was time to grow up. I did not want to wait too long and go to hell. No one could give me a precise cut-off age where one had to accept Jesus. Besides, age 7 is around the time that most people are fully mature, able to reason, and make serious life decisions. I knew this was true because all my church friends were getting baptized.

I began to ask my parents more specific questions about Christianity and picked up an adult Bible. For whatever reason, I began with Psalms. It was always my favorite book. I memorized Psalm 23 one evening. I found my parents sitting together. I recited it to them, and told them that I wanted to be forgiven by Jesus and be saved, explaining the serious thought I had given the subject. I remember that I was worried they might reject me and tell me I wasn't ready or serious enough, which is probably what motivated the memorization of scripture. They said the prayer with me, and I became a Christian.

Immediately, I was fervent. I was taught that this was the only thing that really mattered. Everything on earth is temporary. While I had questions from the age of 3 about aspects of theological doctrine and philosophy that made little sense to me, I did not question the foundation of the belief for many, many years. I accepted the premise readily: Jesus was the son of god, and a relationship with him was the only thing that gave me have value or worth. My goal was to learn and grow and become more like this god. I cared about little else until my teens, which is when I began to question the validity of significant portions of the Bible.

As I studied and prayed and wrote, I came across things that either did not make sense, or that flat-out frightened me about this god. When this would happen, I would carry my Bible around to Christian adults, like my parents and pastor, until I had been given a satisfactory answer. As a teenager, I was given a book as a gift that was meant to be a tool to assist Christians in responding to the questions and doubts of unbelievers. I immediately began searching that book for answers to my own questions, but most of my doubts were not addressed at all. While sometimes the answers given by adults and books did not satisfy, I had to find a way to let go and move on in order to keep believing. My motive, always, was to gain clarity and reaffirm my belief that the Bible was the ultimate truth, inspired by god. I was 18 years old before I could allow myself to even hypothetically examine what I thought I knew from another perspective- a perspective that did not assume there was a god.



Back to age 7: I had been saved! At the same time, it really hit me that practically EVERYONE was going to hell. As my mother taught me, even the Catholics were going to burn.Immediately upon getting saved, I began reading the whole bible, while continuing to memorize passages from Psalms. I wasn't too worried about myself at that time. As a new Christian, I was pretty sure that god would take it easy on me, especially since I was putting in so much effort. But privately, I was an emotional wreck. As I said, practically everyone I knew or came into contact with was going to hell. This understanding destroyed me on the inside. I began faithfully praying for every person I knew by name who wasn't a Christian, or who was the wrong kind of Christian. I worried most about the Catholics and other false Christians, because they thought they were safe.They were not safe. I wanted to help them all, but I soon found that other Christians were resistant to this message. I prayed for nameless people, too. I made lists in my prayer journal. My bedtime prayers sometimes went on for over an hour. By the end, I would be so sad that I couldn't sleep. It was at this age, 8, that I began to suffer from insomnia.

I remember negotiating with my mom at 7 or 8, arguing that I might be the Catholic neighbors' only exposure to real Christianity, and that I could be a good witness (AND get to play Super Mario Bros., which was forbidden in my home). This worked on a few occasions, and I really did witness to the lost, heathen Catholics, explaining to them the evils of Madonna and Michael Jackson. They were exceptionally tolerant of my indoctrinated rudeness. I meant well.



In the 1980's and 1990's, my mother lived in a self-made, fundamentalist prison. She didn't work, and she only listened to Christian radio- though, not the contemporary Christian music station, KSBJ Houston, which she claimed was sinful, worldly, and a tool of the devil. She only associated with women from our church. From the age of 2 to 17, I attended my parents' church,which began as a small, traditional Southern Baptist church. The same church slowly devolved through the years, and it grew into a 5,000-member, Charismatic Christian mess. If you are unfamiliar with Charismatic Christianity, I often explain it as similar to Pentecostal, but much more relaxed and normal-looking on the surface. She deliberately shut out any voices that might challenge her thinking or way of life. Differences of opinion in Biblical interpretation were a big deal to her back then. It caused problems between her and extended family. That was not due to the fact that she was verbally damning them. It was because if she believed, for example, that the small number of liberal Presbyterians on her father's side of the family were not real Christians, she did not want us around them. Not only were they a potentially negative influence, but their liberal views opened them up to demonic attack.

An important facet of Charismatic Christianity is the concept of spiritual warfare. In her mind, there was an invisible spiritual war between good and evil happening everywhere, all the time. This is why a simple children's movie was such a big deal to her. That is why spending time around family members who interpret the Bible in a liberal way and indulged in alcohol could leave our family open to spiritual attack. I barely knew my grandfather growing up because my mother believed he was possessed by demons. She did reveal to me privately some truly hurtful and wrong things he had done to her as a child and young adult, and I could always understand it on that level. But when I tried to ask her how it was that he was demon-possessed in present time, as he had always seemed okay tome, her answer was revealing. She told me that he believed in a Gray Philosophy. She knew the Biblical truth, that the world was black and white, good versus evil. My grandfather believes that life is full of shades of gray. My mother intended to get across the problem that my grandfather did not believe in the nature of sin as she did, and that he did not live by the proper interpretation of the Bible. What she probably did not intend to relay is these shades of gray also meant that he believed in and practiced compassion. He did not believe he had the authority to judge others. He was a grown-up who understood that, even with a moral foundation, there are ethical dilemmas in life where there is no clear-cut right answer. There are times when we have to compromise. There are times when being right is less important than maintaining peace or practicing humility.

My mother wanted to remain in a safe, labeled box, one where everything was simple, and it was easy to judge others to avoid looking at herself. If only I could have seen as a child what is now so blatant. She was consumed and ruled by fear. She shut the world out because she was afraid of it. My mother's religious addiction made her a narcissist. Everything was about her and her feelings. My entire life, until I was able to move out, my feelings did not count. If anything, they were treated as personal insults I needed to apologize to her for having. I was not listened to by her, as she would refuse to listen to anything unpleasant that might cause her to examine herself. If I said,"You hurt me!", she would respond with, "How dare you accuse me of hurting you? Look at all the bad things you are!" And so it would go in every argument. I never realized how terrified she was of what I had to say. Had she listened and taken in the "You hurt me", she would have to accept that she had hurt me. To do so might cause her to feel guilt and regret. Then she would reflect on her behavior with the possibility in mind that she might have made an error. She was unwilling to do anything of the sort until my latter teens. There was no miracle overnight, but progress was slowly made on her part.

Sadly, it wasn't until she knew I had rejected her belief system as false that she became more willing to hear me and look at herself. I say it is sad because my rejection of Christianity was the first thing she could not ignore, and that she viewed as partly her mistake. I do not view it as any kind of mistake. Of all the things she did to me, she thinks this is the thing that matters, and that she needs to try to make up for. It is sad because it is impossible to make someone believe something when they don't believe. It just doesn't work that way. That is why no one has gone back to believing in Santa Claus after discovering the myth. To this day, she thinks I am angry at god, and that I will come back. A lot of her attitude adjustment is related to her desire to bring me back into the fold. I am hurt that she never found me, the real me, to be worth the effort on my own. It is only my soul, which I don't believe in, and her accountability to god that caused her to put in the effort.

I view my lack of belief, my resentment towards bad theology and a harmful ideology, and my feelings about my mother to be three distinct, different issues. The lack of belief is not an issue for me.It is the one area where I have found significant peace. I had to let go of the garbage first,though, and it was difficult. There are claw marks all over my pink New King James Bible. I was reading it into my mid-20's, years after I knew I didn't believe, desperately hoping that I could find a new way to read it that would allow me to justify it as okay and palatable and believable. I worked harder at hanging on to Christianity than anything else in my life. My biggest disappointment is that there are no grades or degrees for that sort of futile effort. The more I tried, the less I believed. Once the house of cards fell, try as I did, I could not rebuild the damn house.

In the early 2000's, something happened. My mother rejoined the work force in the real world. I noticed her soften, her manic zeal and end-of-the-world-ism less pronounced. Many of you kiddos don't know this, but we were living in the End Times in the early 1980's. I know some kids think they are just discovering it, but it was happening way before they were born. I can only assume that at least one sector of the Christian faith will be shouting about the End Times forever. Every decade, there are new faces to the movement, but it will continue to be reborn until there are no more people.

I was not around my mom very much during her first few years teaching, but I noticed some changes. For one, she finally had something to keep her occupied that was not ME. That was fantastic. She always told me that she quit working to stay home with me because she wanted it, but also that it was a sacrifice. I would wince on the inside, wishing she had worked instead of treating me as a child-rearing experiment. She seemed to find her new work fulfilling. Her angry,narrow-minded attitude seemed to be changing, though not radically, as she became newly turned on to right-wing talk radio. I directly attribute her attitude change to her participation in life in the real world. It grounded her and caused her to notice things about life on earth that matter. She began to invest again. She made friends with other teachers. I assume they were all conservatives and Christians, but one of them loved Led Zeppelin, the band my mother had told me was Satanic and forbidden in our house. Another friend she made was a devout and open Catholic. Part of me really wanted to taunt her about it, but I kept my mouth shut. I didn't want to undo any positive changes.



we were living in the End Times in the early 1980's. I know some kids think they are just discovering it, but it was happening way before they were born. I can only assume that at least one sector of the Christian faith will be shouting about the End Times forever.On Christmas day of 2013, I visited my mother in the skilled nursing facility where she was staying after an arm amputation. It was just the two of us, and she asked if I would mind watching the Pope give his speech. I was quite surprised. "The Pope? I thought Catholics weren't real Christians and were going to hell."

"I never said that." My mom is a lot of things, but she is not a liar. When she claims to not remember things, I think it is because part of her doesn't want to remember. And so she forgets.

"YES, you did. You raised me on it."

"Well, I don't remember that. People make mistakes. I may have been wrong about some things."

She went on to tell me why she thought she liked the new Pope. She said that he was teaching a message that was reaching non-Christians like never before. She admitted she didn't know everything about what he has said and done, but that she understood he was practicing the teachings of Jesus: love,compassion and acceptance. She liked the way he was reaching out to so-called sinners, loving them rather than judging. The Pope has said that only god can pass judgment, and he is refusing to discriminate by personally rating sins and condemning some Christians more than others, as so many Christians do.

I was too shocked by this to be angry. What?! I was raised by a religious fanatic whose beliefs and behaviors crossed the line at times into abuse, but she doesn't remember. She's all about love and compassion now?

I never did become angry. I knew immediately that I'd rather have a loving, accepting mom with a conveniently poor memory than the angry, fanatical, crazy, judgmental woman who raised me.



Asa young adult, I was traumatized and scarred as I awoke to find that nothing I believed in growing up was true. I spent hours a day praying, studying my bible, and writing, all for nothing. Ooh, and I was angry for years. But I am not angry anymore. If I do get upset, it is because I know how harmful Biblical ideology is when it's taken seriously. Notice that I did not say 'literally'. I said 'seriously'. I'm grateful I can read about Baptist on Catholic crime in blogs, like the one that inspired me to write this, and be entertained by it, rather than feel tormented and resentful,seething on the inside.

This past year marks the first time I am able to feel grateful for my upbringing. The manic fanaticism consumed me as a child. I took the Bible very seriously because I was taught that it was serious. Had my father not begun teaching me about his god at the age of 3, I never would have begun to ask profound questions about that god before I was old enough to read.Were it not for my indoctrination, I would not have begun studying the bible zealously at 7. I would not have had my first real doubts concerning the credibility and veracity of this god by age 12. I feel gratitude today.

I was 8 years old when I had my first frightening experience while reading the bible. Many are familiar with the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, but I will never forget the first time I read the story of what happened to Lot's wife. I knew then, at that young age, that I was so inquisitive and curious, I would have looked back, too. I would have done the same. Why did god make me so inquisitive, and what would he do to me? It was the first moment I felt acquainted with the god of that book, and he was horribly vindictive and cruel. Would he destroy me for asking too many questions? For searching too deeply? I was terrified of him.

By my observation, most Christians do not put much into their faith. When they see no evidence of god at work, they blame their own shortcomings. I gave my faith everything I had. I studied my bible and prayed like my life and soul depended on it. I was taught that it did. I found nothing but excruciating pain and emptiness. Had I not read my bible cover to cover several times by age 13, I might be another complacent Christian today, feeling guilty for not pulling my weight or giving enough of myself to that relationship. It was my intense loyalty, commitment, and devotion to god that caused me to return to atheism, the lack of belief I was born with. In my own way, I am reborn today. I am so grateful to have found the truth. No matter what the cost in tears,no matter how great the anguish, I would rather know the truth.