Skip to main content

From xtian to Atheist To Satanist

by JP ~

When I first broke the shackles of Christianity, I thought that the Madeline Murray-O'Hare style of atheism was the best fit since she negated ALL of the nonsense and superstition that surrounded Christianity. But as the years wore on, some other points slowly started worming their way into my mind, to wit:

The Sigil of Baphomet: emblem of the Church of...Image via Wikipedia

Christianity did not invent ANYTHING. Concepts such as 'god', 'devil', 'angels', 'demons', 'magic', 'supernatural', 'hereafter', 'worship', 'ritual' 'symbolism' and/or 'ceremonies' were all around THOUSANDS of years before the advent of Christianity. A person who believes in any sort of non-materialistic values should not automatically be relegated to the 'Christian heap' any more than, for example, a Muslim believer should be considered a 'Jew' simply because they both believe in monotheism.

It is understandable if many ex-christians go the straight atheist route. I have nothing bad to say about their beliefs (or lack thereof :)). I only ask that they consider that there are many elements of our universe that cannot yet be explained by science or 'rational' thought.

Atheism does a terrific job of covering the reason factor as far as its relation to Christianity. I have no quarrel with them in that sense. But as human beings, we have not-fully-defined emotional needs as well. No offense is meant herein to the atheists/materialists on this board, but I have to honestly ask: What is more emotionally stimulating: A picture of the atomic symbol of the American Atheists.........or the glorified image of a strong and powerful goat headed Satan holding a dagger or sword aloft?

Personally (and again, this is just my OWN opinion, offense is intended!) , I think straight atheists tend to over play the reason/logic factor a bit without giving due attention to the element of emotion. If you doubt this opinion, allow me to present a scenario: A man comes home to find his house on fire and his little daughter trapped inside, waving frantically from a window for help. Is he going to cast his fears aside and rush in to rescue her because his left brain tells him: "That being is my child and children are born of the parent and are therefore attached thereof; ergo, I must enter the inflamed area and extricate said child because child is an extension of my own self." Hell no! He's going to rush headlong into the flames on PURE EMOTION, suicidal as it may be, because that is his little princess screaming for daddy and reason/logic means nothing to him at that point! Truly, he will achieve 'superhuman' goals as he charges forward, ignores any pain the fire/smoke inflicts on his own body and (hopefully) drags/throws/pushes his little girl to safety in spite of all the odds.

As another example, I have been told some years ago by a practicing martial artist that a person HAS to believe that they can break the 2x4, cinder block, brick or other object in order to be successful. If the would be martial artist was to stand there and 'logically' say, "But....human bone is scientifically/physically 'weaker' than stone. I cannot do it!", there would be no martial arts, period! The would be karate student would fracture his bones on the (physically superior) objects instead of shattering/crushing them.

Bottom line: Emotion itself is 'magic' to me. Emotion, imagination, fantasy and pure unbridled will to power can add up to more than we can possibly conceive! Why not use it to our own advantage ?? :)

30,000 years ago sun, wind, fire, rain, thunder and lightning and any other number of factors could only be 'understood' by our Cro-Magnon ancestors by deferring to unknown 'powers.' One day in the distant future, science may well explain such currently debated topics as 'hauntings', 'reincarnation' claims and 'magic' as natural/physical occurrences. If that is the case, then the Satanist will simply die like everyone else and vanish into dust after having fully enjoyed his or her life as a 'black magician.' If there IS a physical/literal 'Satan' waiting for us after death, the Satanist will join the image/being with which they identified with and served (whether consciously or as an metaphorically) during their time on earth.*

It is for these reasons that I consider myself an 'agnostic' when it comes to belief in Satan as either a deity or a symbolic image. Further, I don't waste much time in trying to 'discover' if Satan literally exists or not because in either case, living a Satanic lifestyle is a win-win situation for Satanists and the (presumed) Dark Lord Himself.

* As a side note, when we really stop to think about it, the notion that Satan wishes to ‘torture us for all eternity in Hell’ because we didn’t believe in ‘god’ is absurd in the extreme! Why would a deity torment His own allies ?? It is a bit like saying a Northerner who was supportive of the Confederacy in 1861 would be executed if he entered the South!


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro