Skip to main content

The Afterlife: Did Anyone get it Right?

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

It appears that every culture we know anything about, from the past few thousand years, has believed in some sort of afterlife. Given the contradictory descriptions, we know they all, or almost all, got the details wrong, but does the persistence of this basic theme suggest that the Christians may be onto something after all? Could every one of these cultures have been TOTALLY wrong about the existence of some sort of hereafter?

Domenico Beccafumi's Inferno: a Christian visi...Image via Wikipedia
On the surface it doesn’t seem likely, but there are things that virtually everyone throughout history has believed which turned out to be wrong. That the earth is flat, for one, and that the sun goes around the earth and that evil spirits cause disease, for others. But, for the sake of discussion, let’s assume there is an afterlife and see what can be said about it.

The Mayans, Aztecs, Egyptians, Norse, Baha’i, Hindus, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, numerous American Indian tribes, and many, many other cultures, all believed in a paradise hereafter (and sometimes a hell), but with great differences among the details. Some believed the afterlife is a cool oasis filled with free-loving virgins and abundant food. Others thought it was a huge rough-hewn lodge with a roaring fireplace and tables loaded with meat and mead. Others thought it was a great plain teeming with wildlife where the hunting would be “happy.” Why did all these cultures from all over the world agree there is an afterlife, but disagree wildly on the details?

It appears that humans just naturally have a fear of death and invent ways to avoid it, yet the details will tend to reflect their own cultures; that is, a good life, however that culture defines it, leads to endless life in some sort of paradise, but the concept of paradise is ultimately subjective. Of course, the True Christian knows that in her religion the afterlife story comes not from a fear of death, as in all those hundreds of other cultures, but genuine revelation; the Christian revelation comes straight from god, through infallible spokesmen. All those other cultures’ religious spokesmen were simply dishonest or deluded.

Yet, some of those ancient cultures built incredible monuments to their beliefs. The Egyptians constructed numerous huge pyramids, some of the largest man-made structures in the world. The first Chinese emperor had a terra-cotta army sculpted and entombed with him, over 8,000 full-size figures in all, including warriors, servants, musicians, acrobats and animals. But, despite their gargantuan efforts, attesting the strength of their convictions, every Christian knows that none of those people ever went to an afterlife, since they weren’t True Christians.

It seems that all those other religions’ descriptions of heaven and hell were just made up. Those other cultures believed their detailed knowledge of the afterlife came from revelations from their gods, but, of course, Christians know that only Christian revelations can be accurate. They know this for the simple reason that the Christian revelations are in the bible and the others are only found in other “holy” books or oral traditions.

Every scrap of "evidence" those other cultures had for the truth of their religion came from human beings. It came from alleged prophets, other religious figures, and “holy” books (just like it does for modern day Christians). But their info came from the wrong prophets and books. The people of those other cultures must have been exhorted to believe on faith, just like today’s Christians, since the evidence NEVER comes from the objective world itself, but always from the claims made by other people. And none of those people were ever able to actually prove anything of substance concerning the existence of their god, the soul, an afterlife, or any revelation. All their so called “revelations” were false because, well…because they’re not in the bible. As one apologist explained, “If the Bible is wrong when it tells us it is infallible, then it contradicts itself. If it contradicts itself, then it is unreliable. If it is unreliable, then our faith is totally shattered and Christianity is a lie. You need to seriously reconsider your logic.”

Clearly, Christianity is different and very, very special. While those other cultures got the afterlife details all wrong, all those Mayans, Aztecs, Egyptians, Norse, Baha’i, Hindus, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, American Indians, etc., only the Christians got it right. Today’s Christians know that those people’s convictions were false, while their own are true, because they feel it in their hearts. Of course, those others felt “the truth” in their hearts, too, but they were obviously deluded. One wonders why they didn’t realize that. The modern Christian would certainly recognize if he was wrong about the afterlife, wouldn’t he?


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi