Skip to main content

Blatant, insensitive and unlawful religious favoritism

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

While the Bible Belt of the South and parts of the Midwest has traditionally been the center of public piety in the US, events of the past few years have shown that no area of the country is really free of it anymore. They’re everywhere, folks, as my most recently published letter-to-the-editor here in Maine attests. Read it and weep.

"Blatant, insensitive and unlawful religious favoritism."

I have just finished reading “A Call to Prayer for Maine,” a document recently drawn up by the Maine Legislative Prayer Caucus which formalizes that organization and calls Mainers to prayer (see the last page of Members include Governor LePage, the Speaker of the House, the Senate President, and over two dozen other Maine State Legislators.

The insensitivity and blatant disrespect of our nation’s Constitution inherent in that document is absolutely astounding! The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. That amendment prohibits governments from entanglement with or promotion of religion, and from impeding the free exercise of religion (outside of government).

Just last year, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb ruled the National Prayer Day unconstitutional, saying the Day amounts to a call for religious action by the government and, since the act of prayer is a religious practice, government is barred from encouraging or discouraging such behavior. These Maine lawmakers are almost certainly aware of this; it appears they simply chose to ignore the wisdom of the Constitution and the court. This public display of piety by our lawmakers, in the face of the law of the land, shows a disturbing lack of respect for our secular government.

This Call to Prayer document is not only exclusionary but insulting to hundreds of thousands of Maine citizens. At one point, in quoting Joshua Chamberlain, a one-time Maine Governor and Civil War hero, the document reads, “This is the mystery of Christ . . .” This is a clear reference to Christianity as the favored religion of this official government caucus. This kind of language implies that all those citizens of other religions, or no religion - all the Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Wiccans, pagans, atheists, agnostics, etc. - are less important to these government officials. And this is precisely why the US Constitution’s First Amendment prohibits government entanglement in religion, as a way to ensure that all citizens are considered equal in the eyes of the government and the law.

These lawmakers need to be reminded that we sent them to Augusta to make and revise laws, not to preach to us about prayer and use their official status and our tax dollars to promote THEIR religion.

It gets worse. The fourth paragraph of the Call to Prayer document reads: “We stand at the threshold of another significant crossroad: either to acknowledge and embrace the vibrant character of our spiritual heritage OR TO PLUNGE HEADLONG INTO THE POSTMODERN VOID – A VALUE-NEUTRAL AND AMORAL VACUUM that endeavors to deconstruct much of what we hold sacred.”

The obvious implications of this statement are that without religion our society would collapse, and people who don’t pray (and perhaps all those who aren’t Christian) are “value-neutral and amoral.” This is grossly insulting nonsense! I don’t pray, but my values are essentially the same as 99% of the population of this state. I don’t pray because I don’t believe in supernatural beings. This says absolutely nothing about my values or morals, or my care and concern for my fellow humans.

The 2008 “American Religious Identification Survey” found that 25% of Maine citizens self-identify as “non-religious.” This government-sponsored “Call to Prayer,” effectively ignores their Constitutional right to have a religion-free government. Now some will say, “But the majority rules!” But they misunderstand. The US Constitution was very carefully designed to protect the rights of individuals and minorities against the “tyranny of the majority.”

The Call to Prayer document and the Legislative Prayer Caucus are insults to all non-Christian citizens of Maine. I am appalled and outraged that my taxes are being used to support such blatant, insensitive and unlawful religious favoritism.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro