Skip to main content

Self Control, Other Control

By Carl S ~

When we look at the actions of believers and compare them to their asserted beliefs of moral superiority, the first thing that often comes to mind is hypocrisy. I'm beginning to wonder if they can see it that way, because it looks like they operate on different standards than the morally sensitive. For instance, seeing nothing wrong with a deity whose "mercy endures forever," yet sometimes sends humans to eternal torment. In fact, the language of belief systems is loaded with oxymorons and double standards, "do as I say, not as I do’s.”

Self ControlJust what is the standard that sees nothing wrong in lying to children, and terrorizing them with Jesus Camp indoctrinations? Parents send their children to Gospel camps and Sunday school to be taught matters of faith they themselves often don't believe. Why? How they don't see such things as being hypocritical must have something to do with what they consider right and wrong.

And, then there is, "Christians are not perfect, but forgiven.” Nobody's perfect, so what's the point? I don't consider it something to brag about, that one can be forgiven for anything and everything. The standard of a cornucopia of forgiveness has no personal responsibility value to it.

What do all religions have in common, exempting the basic, “Love one another as you love yourself?” I will say control, and use criminals and prisons as a starting point. It is obvious that prisons and mental institutions for the criminally inclined exist because there is a need to protect the public. If those individuals cannot control their criminal behavior, then society will do it for them. It's the way the justice system works. But, the primary foundational reason for religious perpetuation is its insidious doctrine that EVERY individual is basically bad, with a serious need to be controlled lest this badness gets out of hand. This calls for control by fear and/or, force.

Religion has been shown to be somewhat effective in doing this while, however, adhering to a different standard; namely, as long as actions, however heinous, are done FOR the religion, they're moral. Christian control is based on Genesis 8:21, “. . . every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood." The rules get complicated as restrictions apply to even the most ordinary human pursuits of what you eat and drink, your sex life, your attitude to the opposite or same sex, and on and on.

Religion punishes you, by its very nature, not only for what you do, (for which it holds the 'forgiveness' carrot stick), but even for what you MIGHT do. Take a good look at yourself; are you really a hardened criminal needing to be controlled?

Interestingly, Bible-god is completely lacking in self-control, as much as the most hardened criminal, but believers are "Don't ask, don't tell“ about this. The authority we are to submit to and trust is neither under control nor trustworthy. Religion teaches not to trust your own moral compass. The whole system relies on each member not trusting his own conscience, doubts, or reason - all the things which make us free individuals. This is ancient, and is accompanied by methods to undermine - by distrust of one's own character, if need be - via fears that one WILL become out of control without the beliefs. This fear is a powerful force, used by all totalitarian regimes. (Love that word "totalitarian.” Total control)

Free will, as defined by religions, means that humans, unfettered, will make immoral choices on their own, since that's the way religions interpret human nature. (See again : Genesis 8:21. Also, thank St. Paul and the other early Christian misogynists for this.) The doctrine of evil-from-youth becomes an imperative, a double-edged sword, binding both clergy and believers to religions’ negative and judgmental attitudes toward all human beings.

On our own we are all as grubby children whose dirty hands will never be clean, and though forgiven, we'll always have that reminder ready to be brought up anytime a guilt trip is needed. Our mere existence makes us totally in need of bowing down, lest we damage ourselves or others. Are we criminals just in being born? Who says so? The controllers. Brilliantly, Christianity has found a way to make people control themselves, by the example of Jesus, whose obedience to God, i.e., himself, went so far as death. The cross is everywhere to remind us to copy him and obey, to sacrifice, whatever the command may be.

This is the same message all the other human sacrifice religions demanded one to follow. There's another interesting facet of the system: Those who "play the system," know it. They're smooth, sailing under the radar - attending church services, praying the words, witnessing, contributing , who may actually believe some things, or not. Morality has nothing to do with their participation, which is a good cover for them. It's an excellent cover for their pastors, if they want to take advantage of it. Control the "image" and you control the power over others, and no matter what you do, you will always be forgiven.

Religions don't promote morality. They promote themselves. They don’t promote responsibility, but forgiveness, obedience to their "authority," and reasons to make excuses for bad behavior.

This is what children are taught by religion to accept as “virtuous. “ Blind, unquestioning obedience is the virtue taught by the Nazis, the Taliban, and religious cults of all persuasions. Yeah, totally different standards from the truly morally sensitive.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two