Skip to main content

Two Plus Two Equals Four

By Trilby ~

The things I hear other people say about my discarded religion sometimes make me feel like laughing and crying openly. This is not always a good thing, since my mother is Christian and somewhat serious about it. And sometimes, just speaking about my non-traditional religion can cause others to make it feel like I am an outcast or somehow silly for not believing in their God.

Buttons, calculatorImage via Wikipedia

I, of course, say "their God" because that's all it is to me. And to anyone who does not share the same religion. I balk at the fantastic double-thinking involved in being able to say, "My God is real, but theirs is wrong. Even if they say that theirs is real and mine is wrong, I'm right because my God says I am. They are wrong, even if their God says they are not." And that, I believe, is why I finally abandoned Christianity in the first place. The sheer loops of logic I had to try and follow to understand the above ideology were a waste of time. And even at the age of ten years, I couldn't help but wonder: "What makes Christianity special? What makes it more 'right' than Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Shinto, Wicca, or any other belief?" I honestly couldn't find the answer.

Talking to Christians has given me numerous arguments to refute in this regard. "Christianity is right because all other religions are derived from it." Not true. Buddhism and Hinduism are far older. Other Eastern religions are derived from those as well. Then, there is ever-popular one: "The Bible says it so it is right." The Quran says so, too. As do the pyramid walls in Egypt. Doctor Seuss says that there is a Wocket in my Pocket. Harry Potter must exist, too. Yes, it was written. That does not make it true, even if it was written long ago. The argument I've heard against this: "People would not make this stuff up. They would have no reason to." False. I could lock in a time capsule a book describing the ways in which the Flying Spaghetti Monster touched the earth with his noodly appendage and brought about life.

Five-hundred years from now, that could be completely accepted as truth. Just as much as the Christian God is accepted now. I could make up anything, just for fun, and it could be a religion.

So, that leaves the explanation: "Christianity is best because God tells me so." Can they prove this? No. So, it is not a valid answer. Moving on.

Since there is no reasonable answer to the question, I have concluded that the original premise must have been false. Christianity is equal to all other religions. It is simply a choice. No problem then.

Or there should be no problem at least. So, why do many of the proponents of so many ideologies and beliefs choose to antagonize each other, convert each other, persuade each other, look down on each other? Where is the sense? Why? Because they have "faith" that their god/gods/deities/aliens want them to do so. Now, really, what is faith?

I ask that seriously: What is faith? I have checked an online dictionary. It had many definitions. They ranged from faith in another person, to belief in anything, to belief not based on proof, to specific belief in the Christian God.

Belief without proof. That seems to be the pervading notion of the meanings of the word. And yet, this very word: "faith" is constantly used as a trump card in arguments regarding morality, theology, and ethics. The "lack of proof" has somehow become double-speak for proof. "Proof" that God exists. "Proof" that Christianity is right. "Proof" that all non-Christian religions are evil. "Proof" that the earth has developed in only a few thousand years. "Proof" that homosexuality is immoral, that abortion is immoral, that so many behaviors are immoral. These arguments are made, citing the bible as proof when in fact the bible is based on faith - a literal "belief without proof!" And these arguments, with no proof, are accepted by the blind. Blind faith. They are blind to the people who do not share their disability, and the blind continue to lead the blind, making their children blind as well. The cycle continues. So long as they are blind, so long as they have "faith," two plus two can equal five. So long as their God says so, their pure opinions can be "right" with all others as "wrong."

Countless times, I have seen the Bible cited as a source. A document, based on faith, used as actual evidence ("proof") in order to enforce someone's opinion of how I, an ex-Christian, should live. In both school and national debate. It has begun to have more weight than pure logic. Because sometimes, words of logic "have no source."

Well, I say this: No more. These notions of a "lack of proof" having as much weight as actual proof must be shot down and corrected. Otherwise, truth and lies will continue to mix until all debate becomes nothing but a farce. Flimsy opinions versus shallow conjectures. Does that sound intellectually stimulating?

Whether or not religion in general is a problem, the blind acceptance ("faith") involved most definitely is. It is a large source of ignorance, which is also a large source of evil. People need to think, question, and criticize what they hear or read - before the world starts to bring Oceania, Orwell's nightmarish dystopia where all things are accepted if said by Big Brother, into reality.

And yes, I do see connections between blindly accepting an ancient text and blindly accepting a government figurehead. It's all the same to me.

All it takes to prevent such a world is for those who look for truth to rise up. It takes sites like this, encouraging people to question what they believe.

Sites like this help people toss off the chains of blind faith, open their eyes, and say that they know: "Two plus two equals four."

As a free-thinking ex-Christian, I have to thank you for creating this web site. I wish the best for it.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two