Skip to main content

Getting God’s Self-Appointed Messengers Out of Your Head

By Valerie Tarico ~

The self appointed messengers of God are legion. Some lived thousands of years ago; some stand weekly in front of thousands of people. Some lecture you from the pulpit; some lecture you when you go home for the holidays. And even when they don’t make sense, their words can haunt you:
“Believe and ye shall be saved.” “Lean not unto your own understanding.” “Wives submit to your husbands.” “Trust and obey, for there’s no other way.” “Jesus was a liar, lunatic or Lord.” “God has a wonderful plan for your life.” “God hates fags.”

Get out of my headImage by Kali Sánchez via Flickr
Which Christian buzz phrases are stuck in your brain?

Despite the demi-divine status given to religious authorities by social traditions and institutions, each of God’s messengers was (or is) a real, complicated human being with biases and blind spots and favorite foods and morning breath. They are not gods and they are not you. So how can you get them out of your head—or at least reduce them to muffled background noise?

I was a psychotherapist for twenty years, but I like to say that long before I was a decent therapist I was an excellent “therapee.” What I mean by that is, therapy worked for me. Two factors seemed particularly powerful. One was taking the time to excavate the past. If I could understand why I was thinking/feeling/behaving in a certain way—where it came from in my own history, or the history of my family, or even the history of our culture--that changed it. The “aha” experience somehow freed me up. The past became less able to dictate the present, and I became more able to live according to my here-and-now dreams and values.

On top of that, therapy was very good at helping to separate the me from the not-me. “Who says you have to go rock climbing?” my therapist would ask. “Because it sure sounds like you hate it.”

“Oh. Yeah.” I would say sheepishly. “That’s my Dad.”

As I learned to recognize other people’s voices in my mind, I learned to pick out the authentic voice of Valerie despite the competing clamor. But I wasn’t done. The next step in getting the not-me out of my head was learning to talk back. I practiced (tentatively at first and then firmly) saying, “Tio, you may value sleek cars, but I don’t; I love my ugly hatchback.” “Mom, you may be ashamed that I’m living with my boyfriend [now my husband of nineteen years] but I’m flourishing in this relationship.” “Glamour, you may say I should weigh less, but I like my strong, sturdy body.”

Cleansing your mind of outgrown religious ideas is individuation work, just like learning to question your parents. Then, once I started arguing back, something else happened. I began realizing that those opinionated guilt-trippers I was arguing with weren’t actually the voices of other people after all, at least not flesh and blood people. Instead they were made-up versions who lived only in my head, often fairly two-dimensional, cartoonish versions at that. Real world people might--–get this radical notion—grow and change, but my internal version of them wouldn’t. By the time I had the conversation with my therapist about climbing, my father had long outgrown any desire for me to be his first son; he could care less whether I did bouldering. He didn’t even do it himself anymore.

The secret to my therapy was this combination:
  • Delving into my own history and figuring out where some of my screwy notions and out-of-balance feelings came from.
  • Dealing with the clamor of opinionated people in my head who were not me.
    • identifying the not-me cast of characters and arguing back
    • realizing that they were mere synaptic programs and challenging the authenticity of their scripts---and, finally,-----
    • discovering that I could be true to my own values and dreams regardless of their opinions

This was powerful stuff. In fact, it was life-changing. Mind you, the work is ongoing.

Getting other people out of your head isn’t easy because they get in there so early. While most animals have their behavior largely programmed by instinct, humans rely on information being handed down from one generation to the next. For this reason, one of the key characteristics of human childhood is credulity. If trusted authorities like parents or teachers say it, children believe it.

But children don’t simply parrot what adults say; the process is much more sophisticated than that. Yes, they do memorize specific phrases, but also they construct an internal representation of each trusted authority figure, like a virtual version of mom or dad --what developmentalists call an “introject.” The ability to create introjects is adaptive. Owning a virtual copy of each parent, even an imperfect copy, means you can venture away from your actual physical caregivers and still have some access to their superior knowledge and experience. In other words, early on, carrying authority figures around in your head actually helps you to become more independent.

But when the time comes to leave home, the opposite can be true.

Each of us reaches a point when we need to question what we learned as children, to revisit some of our basic assumptions in light of our own life experience and ability to think. We need to make major life decisions based on our own deepest values and sense of life mission. In this situation, having your parents (et al) in your head can be a liability—especially if they were particularly opinionated, or smart, or powerful, or enmeshed or (ironically) abusive—or if you were particularly anxious or compliant or prone to self-doubt.

It has been said that in young adulthood we need to individuate from two sets of parents: reality parents and introjected parents. These are two related but distinct challenges. For those of us who were raised religious, there is another set of authority figures in our heads: gods and their messengers. By messengers I mean pastors or priests, Sunday school teachers, Bible study leaders, youth ministers and Christian college professors. I also mean the writers of sacred texts, whose words we have often heard repeated over and over. (One of the most powerful tools for creating belief in the absence of evidence is simple repetition.) I use the word “gods,” plural, deliberately, because even people who are raised monotheistic often have multiple conflicting god-concepts that can be activated under different circumstances: the judgmental god, the abstract god, the Jesus buddy . . . .

At some point in the process of identity formation we may realize that we have a Ben-Hur-sized cast of religious authorities in our heads and that we ourselves don’t actually agree with them. We may set off on our own journeys of inquiry despite their disapproval. We may, by sheer force of will, live by our own values rather than theirs. But even after years of independence, the fight can be exhausting. A wicked-smart, fiercely independent friend who walked away from fundamentalism decades ago recently confessed, “Deep down, I'm still afraid I'll go to hell IF the God of Joshua should be the real ruler of the universe. It's illogical and flies in the face of all the empirical evidence--but it's POSSIBLE.” He knows that at some level all things are possible, and he also knows that many things that are possible are just plain silly. He knows that being mentally healthy means living in a world of probabilities, not possibilities. But those childhood myths still echo.

Cleansing your mind of outgrown religious ideas is individuation work, just like learning to question your parents, learning to distinguish their opinions from yours. And the tricks and tools are much the same:
  • Dig into history—the history of the Christianity you inherited and your own history. Remember, when you understand the past, it has less power to control the present. To better understand Christian history, first read about how to look at ancient texts through a critical lens like scholars do. (It’s very cool.) Start with Bart Ehrman. Try Thom Stark. Poke around in the work of the Jesus Seminar. When you examine your own history, ask how the Christian dogmas, priorities, and buzz phrases in your head got there—Were there pivotal experiences like summer camps? Bible studies? Youth groups? What made you particularly vulnerable to certain handed down beliefs?
  • Deal with the cast of characters that have made their way from the pages of the Bible and the Christian hierarchy into your mind.
    • Remember, the Bible is an anthology, a collection with a lot of authors. Once you let yourself pay attention, you’ll notice that the Bible quotes in your mind don’t even agree with each other about what is real and what matters. Tell yourself that every epistle, creed or doctrinal statement was half of an argument (because this is true). Who were the writers arguing with? What was the other side of the argument?
    • Learn to recognize the voices of your old authority figures, the ones that transmitted ideas from the Bible writers or John Calvin to you. What do you know about them now that you didn’t then? Which of your values do they share? Which do they not share? Push back, and be firm about it.
    • Question the authenticity of simplistic, cartoonish messages. Inerrant texts? Four Spiritual Laws? Hell and Heaven? Really? You know better. Use what you’ve learned about psychology, science, history, and ethics. Trust what you know about beauty and love, wonder, joy, curiosity, and kindness – because you do know, deeply, about each of these.

And, finally...

Pay attention to you own values and dreams. You may have to listen hard at first because of all the clamor. But if you can learn to identify the other speakers, eventually you will be able to tune in to the voice that is not theirs, but yours.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro