Skip to main content

On Becoming a Passionate Atheist

By Carl S ~

A recent letter from American Atheists says,
"Each year, the Christmas season brings critics out of the woodwork to challenge us on our "war on Christmas," followed by attacks on our morality... The funny thing is that we have not really had a war on Christmas; we were just blamed for having one anyway. Ladies and gentlemen, if we are to be blamed for a war on Christmas, why not do something to deserve it?"

Atheists, like scientists, are portrayed by the religious and the media, as cold, analytical, logical . . . and dispassionate, despite the overjoyed reactions we share over new discoveries. How can believers ignore the shouts and hugging at NASA control when landers touch down on Mars, or astronauts land and walk on the moon, or when Voyager spacecraft and the Hubble telescope send their first pictures? What drives scientists to spend tedious hours, days, years, keeping precise measurements and records in the labs, or working with trowels and small brushes, dusting off ancient bones in intense desert heat, day after day? What passion takes them into active volcanoes, or into the depths of the Mariana Trench? The dedication and risks taken are sometimes astounding.

Consider, if the New Atheists did not make so much sense, they would not be attacked as nuts fixated on reason, cold logic, in defiance of warm, contented, " know-in-one's-heart" belief. Let's counter-argue that atheists are just as passionate as the most righteous believer. What believer, taking the stance that the resurrection is physically impossible, and therefor must be true, rejoicing in it as authentication of her own desire for immortal life, dares to have the passion to find evidence for this?

If you asked the believer to believe that that teapot orbiting the earth is really there, though un-seeable, you would rightly expect to be mocked. That would take faith, you know. But, "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe." For the believer believes that if it doesn't make sense to humans, it must be really important. The believer is passionate about this to the extent of saying that if his god said it, that's what it means, and if his god says something that contradicts what he formerly said, that isn't what he really meant. In fact, the passion is so intense and real that it's like that love which is called "blind;" immune to reason, with but a tenuous connection to reality.

Ask yourself what is more passionate and sensitive: to help alleviate needless human suffering and death, or to send money instead to the likes of Pat Robertson, or a wealthy Pope, or to purchase a vial of "holy" water from a TV pitchman? So, most atheists, I think, had that formal traditional dedication to the beliefs they were raised in. But, being sensitive and passionate, when they sensed something "wrong" in their beliefs, pursued their intuitions and gut feelings like scientists trying to crack the DNA code, or pursuing fossils, testing constantly for the facts. Whatever it took, they dared to go into forbidden places. Let's get down to those contradictions, find out the truth, and question why such beliefs are held and authorities are honored. Let’s see other sides: pore through history, ethics, moral writings, even mythology, and find the buried facts, even if it means losing esteem, the camaraderie of believers, and being rejected. Most atheists bring a passionate, obsessive dedication to the pursuit of truth, justice, and fairness that any ethical defense lawyer would admire.

Why wouldn’t they be angry at those who would put them down, reviling them for their behavior, demanding that they be as indifferent to evidence as themselves? Are atheists not in the same situation as Afro- Americans before THEY protested? Aren't we the "niggahs" to the Christian Righteous? Shouldn’t our passions deserve fair treatment, an equal voice, and respect? Yet, we are arrogantly attacked. As those African- Americans of the 1960s did, we too must speak out. Things will not get better if we allow this status quo. . . if we cease to insist that the emperor has no clothes, that we are morally good, based on the rational desire - passionately defended - for the betterment of all human lives.

Ask yourself what is more passionate and sensitive: to help alleviate needless human suffering and death, or to send money instead to the likes of Pat Robertson, or a wealthy Pope, or to purchase a vial of "holy" water from a TV pitchman? Is it compassionate to believe that all the people on earth were so bad, including infants, that they deserved to be drowned in The Flood? What kind of a person would WANT to accept humans as universally bad? That's a sickness of psychopaths. Atheists do not have that attitude; freedom from that belief and those like it in the heart of religions is what drives us. We cherish the freedom to think, to learn, to understand, and be members of this world and to give a damn about our humanity because there are no gods to care, no impending supernatural deliverances, and because there are so many more “Aha!” and "That's curious..." discoveries to be made.

Our passionate curiosity has made us much better human beings than we were before, as believers. We want to share our acquired knowledge, to free others, and have them participate. We're sick of the believers’ wet-blanketing of our enthusiasm, and their demands that we "stifle it". Are our intentions really "evil"? We might turn the question back at those who are degrading us. We are NOT "niggahs who deserve it." And if they can't handle the truth about us, it's their problem, as reality usually is for them.

It’s time to demand the respect we with OUR passions deserve. It's way, way, overdue.


Popular posts from this blog

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi