Skip to main content

The Cross, The Crescent, and Other Symbols

By Carl S --

Since the major religions have supplanted the pagan ones, we might question if they are better.
Red Crescent+CrossImage by peadar via Flickr
Is the Islamic, Christian, Israelite god any less bloodthirsty, mean, or invisible, for instance? Not really. In fact, there was tolerance for other belief systems in pagan Rome, before the intolerant Christians started their destructions of lives and properties, even each others’.

One notes how the Roman Catholic Church became the closest thing to paganism in transforming the gods into saints. (A god, ergo, a saint, for every eventuality: lost causes, finding lost objects, for music, sailors, etc.) The church also stole, for its own purposes, ceremonies, incense, incantations, rituals, and Dec. 25th. Paganism lives on in the RCC.

Is paganism, outside of its obvious practitioners, still alive? Well, consider the Apollo spacecraft, astrology, names of the planets, the names of NASA projects, Nike shoes, Mercury autos, American Idol, etc.

Look at the bigger pagan picture including mythology and fantasy. Reason, evidence, and logic are emphasized in atheist/agnostic writings. While these cannot be emphasized enough, in dealing with religions we also need to take on fantasy and its appeal, and the fact that one has the same options and methods in using fantasy for moral examples as did Aesop and the other fairy tale writers. Religion has lots of competition to offer.

Fantasy sells. Consider Harry Potter, the Left Behind books, Playboy, romance novels, porn, superheroes, the Virgin Mary, Jesus, Islamic folk heroes, heaven, Nirvana, Sci-Fi.

One of the overlooked innovators in fantasy is a man who once upon a time changed the world with a great imagination and big plans. He created characters never seen before, with personalities to compete with the gods. He animated fairy tales themselves, shaping them to his own visions of them, his own interpretations. He created a sort of secular religion, intentionally or not. In place of “holy’ pictures, statues of saints and shrines to them, he brought animated films, statues of Mickey, Donald Duck, a pantheon of other characters, and nature documentaries verging on pantheism. (I have a statue of one of the Seven Dwarfs, Grumpy, nearby.) His fantasy industry included watches, comic books, stuffed characters children carry around and to bed with them. And perhaps most notably, Disneyland and Disney World, which are in competition with the Vatican for fantasies.

Eventually, theatrical film reached the point of combining live actors with animation — a mixture any priest or rabbi would envy.

Notice some of the symbols which are recognized worldwide today: the cross, the Star of David, the crescent of Islam, the mouse ears.

Disney’s contemporaries were inspired and created Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd - the whole Warner Brothers gang of imaginative characters. Later, Charles Schulz and “Peanuts” came along and Charlie Brown, Snoopy, Linus and the others became “real,” with marketing spin-offs of their own: statues (again), TV specials, mass merchandising products. And was there ever a mixture of fantasies to compare with “A Charlie Brown Christmas”, with fabricated characters dramatizing a traditionally fabricated religion-story? Even Charles Dickens, with his pagan Christmas interpretation, didn’t do that.

Think about this: The Moslems are missing out on a huge source of marketing revenue because they don’t allow pictures or statues of Mohammed. They should learn from the RCC, Disney, and all those televangelists selling their holy junk.

When it came to fantasy, it was Bill Watterson who out-Disneyed Disney. The creator of Calvin and Hobbes refused to market the tiger, Hobbes, stating that the tiger’s “reality” was all in the imagination of Calvin and should stay there. (You might make a case for this, that the believer’s personal god is akin to Calvin’s “Hobbes”.)

With special effects, video games, animation, and other forms of secular fantasy-making, we have a competition with traditional religious fantasies. And the religions steal the same methods and technology for their purposes, just as they stole from the pagans. Oh, and they try mightily to be entertaining, like the secular successes they compete with.

Well, what shall it be, St. Paul, the sexually conflicted, or Wile E. Coyote, the frustrated, never-quitting? Church or “Cheers,” Moses or Bugs Bunny? Will you have the wonders of nature documentaries and scientific discoveries, which go beyond not just fantasy and imagination, but into what we couldn’t possibly imagine, or the screwy search for Noah’s ark or Cinderella’s glass slipper?

There’s the difference. We know cartoons and fables are fantasies which make us think about serious things without requiring us to relinquish our minds, our reason, or our morals. In contrast, religions demand obedience to them while refusing to admit they are fantasies. Our fantasies do not impel us to hurt or kill and no one is harmed. Clearly, Christianity is no improvement over paganism. In fact, practically speaking, Christianity today is merely paganism in fancier clothes.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro