Skip to main content

Jesus, Dinosaurs and More

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) --

I happened across an utterly fascinating and totally hilarious web site the other day that I just had to share with you people of reason. The web site is called “Jesus, Dinosaurs and More.” The specific article I read was titled, “Were people in the Old Testament really that Old?

The anonymous author is referring to the numerous men in the Bible who lived to be several hundred years old. He (or she?) lists seven, including Adam, who lived over 900 years and writes, “When you look at the age of the Patriarchs (Adam's descendants) in Genesis you will see two things. One, is that from Adam to Noah the average life span was somewhere in the neighborhood of 900 years.”

He also provides a really neat graph with data points for ages at death of some Biblical men and some Kings of England, showing how the average life span of humans declined from about 900 at the start, through a period of 200 to 500, and then down to less than 100. As he explains, “The life span of man has been declining since the flood. The average age of man quickly dropped to less than 100 in the 200 years after the flood.” Given this info and the data plot, it is clear that the flood occurred around 1400 BCE. Unfortunately, he doesn’t mention why the ancient Sumerians, Egyptians, Greeks, etc. never mentioned this flood in their writings of this period, or why there is no geological evidence for this worldwide cataclysm.

Anyway, you’re probably just dying to know how those guys lived so long. Well, according to the author, “These people lived in a very different world than we do today (this was at a time before the flood described in Genesis). God created the earth perfect. But when Adam sinned this world began to decay. Then when the flood came, things really got wrecked.”

Then comes one of my favorite parts of the narrative, “Some Creationists believe that the pre-flood vapor canopy (the firmament in GEN 1:6) would filter out radiation, and hold in incoming solar heat making the earth a warmer place to live. This "expanse" separated the "waters above" from the "waters below" in the Creation week. I believe that the firmament may have collapsed at the time of the flood.” Aha! The “firmament” collapsed. Talk about a cataclysm!

And after the firmament collapsed? “As a result harmful radiation can enter the earth more easily than before, bringing with it all kinds of damaging effects.” So there you have it. Curiously, the author doesn’t explain why people today typically die from heart failure, cancer or other diseases (and accidents), but almost never from the measurable effects of radiation.

Now, please observe how the author uses science to make SOME of his points. He says, “Some critics claim that the 900 years of life mentioned in the Bible were not literal years. They claim that back then people counted each month as a year.” Then he proves this argument makes no sense by showing that the Bible says Cainan had a son when he was 70, which would make Cainan only 5 years-old at the time (if we were dividing 70 by 12) and, as he says, “This is impossible.”

I was frankly a tad surprised that the author finds anything impossible, although, in his defense, he also noted that, “Moses compiled Genesis. He could clearly differentiate between a month and a year. He did so many times in his writing.” He then followed that argument with this incontestable logical gem, “Also, when Jesus came to earth he taught us many things. If the Patriarchs did not live as long as the Bible claims then Jesus would have told us.” Well there you have it, proof positive!

As the TV hucksters say, “But that’s not all!” The author then goes on to buttress his case by noting a number of facts about Neanderthals (patience, I’ll explain!). As he says, “This page will show you that these people were human, but had odd facial features resulting from living to great ages.” Yep, you guessed it, the Neanderthals lived for 900 years or so and, as numerous studies have shown (which he cites), the face and head of humans (now including Neanderthals, remember) never stop growing throughout their lives. This, of course, leads us to the obvious conclusion, that the author never mentions; those really old guys in the Bible, like Adam, Seth, Noah, and Methuselah, were Neanderthals!

At the end of his article, the author writes, “I was surprised at first to find how many people had never heard that the Bible teaches Adam and his descendants lived for hundreds of years. Then I realized, if no one knew this fact, then no one could apply that fact to the fossil record and interpret it correctly.” I guess we should be thankful to this guy for clearing things up, but I think there might still be some lingering confusion somewhere. You see, from the sediment layers their fossils are found in, and from several different, yet consistent radiometric dating methods, we now know that the Neanderthals went extinct at least 25,000 years ago. Now, according to the author’s plot, that was at least 20,000 years before Adam was created. Hmmm.

He closes his article with an invitation to e-mail him any questions or comments the reader might have. Of course I couldn’t resist.

My e-mail: “Thank you so much for posting this ‘explanation.’ I have not laughed so hard in... I don't know how long. Your "scientific" explanations of Biblical myths are so harebrained, so infested with scientific ignorance, that no comedy writer could possibly come up with such hilarious nonsense. You really need to consider that perhaps you believe the Bible is fact only because you have been told it is, and not because the stories in it are plausible.”

Okay, I’ve had my fun with this guy, and he is a ridiculously easy target, but… I am left with a very uneasy feeling. You see, his article was actually pretty well written, articulate and with very few, if any, grammatical errors. He is frightfully ignorant and gullible, yes, but he is not stupid. I always find it genuinely scary when I come across intelligent people who believe utter nonsense. Such people can’t just be written off since they are smart enough to be convincing to many others. These are the type of people who write religious books, build media empires and creation museums and keep the nonsense very much alive. As Valerie Tarico has written several times on these pages, truly intelligent people are very clever rationalizers. They are often very good at fashioning nonsense into fascinating, and occasionally plausible shapes – plausible to some people, anyway.

What appears to be lacking in the intelligent believers (the honest ones, anyway)  is a functioning bullshit detector, so I’ll say it again; a course in critical thinking, including some very basic science and probability theory, should be taught in every American high school. I know, I know… fat chance the believers in charge are going to give kids the tools necessary to dismantle their teachers’ and parents’ delusions. But I can dream, can’t I?


Popular posts from this blog


By David Andrew Dugle ~ O ctober. Halloween. It's time to visit the haunted house I used to live in. When I was five my dad was able to build a big modern house. Moving in before it was complete, my younger brother and I were sleeping in a large unfinished area directly under the living room. It should have been too new to be a haunted house, but now and then I would wake up in the tiny, dark hours and see the blurry image of a face, or at least what I took to be a face, glowing, faintly yellow, high up on the wall near the ceiling. I'm not kidding! Most nights it didn’t appear at all. But when it did show itself, at first I thought it was a ghost and it scared me like nothing else I’d ever seen. But the face never did anything; unmoving, it just stayed in that one spot. Turning on the lights would make it disappear, making my fears difficult to explain, so I never told anyone. My Sunday School teachers had always told me to be good because God was just behind m

Reasons for my disbelief

By Rebekah ~ T here are many layers to the reasons for my disbelief, most of which I haven't even touched on here... When I think of Evangelical Christianity, two concepts come to mind: intense psychological traps, and the danger of glossing over and missing a true appreciation for the one life we know that we have. I am actually agnostic when it comes to a being who set creation in motion and remains separated from us in a different realm. If there is a deistic God, then he/she doesn't particularly care if I believe in them, so I won't force belief and instead I will focus on this one life that I know I have, with the people I can see and feel. But I do have a lot of experience with the ideas of God put forth by Evangelical Christianity, and am confident it isn't true. If it's the case god has indeed created both a physical and a heavenly spiritual realm, then why did God even need to create a physical realm? If the point of its existence is to evolve to pas

The Blame Game or Shit Happens

By Webmdave ~ A relative suffering from Type 1 diabetes was recently hospitalized for an emergency amputation. The physicians hoped to halt the spread of septic gangrene seeping from an incurable foot wound. Naturally, family and friends were very concerned. His wife was especially concerned. She bemoaned, “I just don’t want this (the advanced sepsis and the resultant amputation) to be my fault.” It may be that this couple didn’t fully comprehend the seriousness of the situation. It may be that their choice of treatment was less than ideal. Perhaps their home diabetes maintenance was inconsistent. Some Christians I know might say the culprit was a lack of spiritual faith. Others would credit it all to God’s mysterious will. Surely there is someone or something to blame. Someone to whom to ascribe credit. Isn’t there? A few days after the operation, I was talking to a man who had family members who had suffered similar diabetic experiences. Some of those also suffered ea

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two