Skip to main content

Christian Untermenschen

By tekHedd ~

It's not a new word for me, but you don't hear it very often unless you're talking about the Nazis: Untermensch.

So here I was in a nice friendly discussion on a web forum, and unfortunately the original discussion had something to do with religion. Well, it's not really unfortunate until someone decides they need to try their latest political talking point. (Or everyone does.) And of course things got a bit heated but mostly fairly reasonable. I am personally in favor of keeping god out of government so that it won't start telling us all how and when to pray, and to whom, but... well... I mean I'm open to rational arguments to the contrary. The way I see it, if you don't trust your government to manage your health care, how can you trust them with your soul?

But hey whatever. I avoided the entire religion-in-government part of the discussion, because it was off topic. Same old boring talking points.

And then there was this post, which (seemingly) represents the thinking of a lot of American conservatives:

I think you'd have trouble convincing many constitutional and legal scholars, as well as lawyers and politicians here in the U.S., besides the majority of we Americans, that the First Amendment and it's separations regarding matters of church and state, means that people of faith must become a sort of second class citizen, an American Untermensch if you will, with their freedom of speech rights suppressed, along with all public expressions of religious thought and beliefs removed from public discourse and view, by a federal government that has somehow established atheism as the official belief system of the United States government.

I'm sick of people implying that "not having a state religion" is the same as "having atheism as a state religion." You could poll a thousand atheists, and not one would want to see an official state religion of any kind. That's the whole point! If you think about it, this post is really saying that not having Christianity as the official state religion is a form of oppression. When I state it that way, I realize that the poster will backpedal and say "no that's not what I mean," but it's what he said, and I think it's what a lot of people really believe. They refuse to openly admit that they want a Christian theocracy, but they still vote and talk that way.

But, OK, so this guy wants to remove religious freedom from the state and make the state itself an organ of the Church. Does that make me mad? No. It's stupid, but hey if he want to (in my opinion) destroy what makes this country great, he has a right to work for that. It's his country too.

What really makes me mad is the victim mentality.

Wouldn't it be horrible to hear the president quoted as saying things like "Christians should not be considered true patriots or true citizens. This is a godless country?" This passage implies that by removing "Under God" from our government, by removing a forced acknowledgment of God as the one true deity, we turn Christians into an "American Untermensch?" Are you serious? Government neutrality puts us on equal footing; if that is a form of oppression, then the Bill of Rights with its "created equal" talk is just an oppressive document that should be destroyed. Again, that's not what he would claim that he really meant, no, it is just what he said.

I have to ask a question. Are you Christians afraid you will find yourselves in a country where open believers in God are publicly vilified? Where a Christian could never, ever be elected to public office, and if one is it is a media event? Wouldn't it be horrible to hear the president quoted as saying things like "Christians should not be considered true patriots or true citizens. This is a godless country?" Are you afraid you will live in a country where the Pledge of Allegiance includes the phrase "without God," and every dollar bill, every coin says "There Is No God" on it? How would a Christian feel living in this country?

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? This is the country I live in. I am an atheist, and we are gently but firmly excluded from government and full citizenship. Do I go around claiming to be a victim? Well, I haven't, but maybe it's about time I did. Hey, Christians do it all the time.

So, my Christian friend, the next time you are victimized because nonbelievers have a vote in how the country is being run, let me teach you the word for that: Equality .


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two