Skip to main content

To Go Where Few Dare To Go

By Carl S ~

The other day, I sent a get-well card to my wife's pastor and his wife. When it came time to address the envelope, I was told to make it “Pastor”... etc. This I will not do. (She did not question why I won’t.) I would have told her that I will never again use the addresses pastor, reverend, your eminence, father, Holy Father, and so on. First of all, I find nothing to “revere” about them. Second of all, such terms are not appropriate in these United States, any more than Your Majesty or My Lord are. I don't care if the President addresses a catholic cardinal as “your eminence.” He shouldn't. (Right now one of those “eminences” has been charged with covering up for priest pedophiles in California.) Thirdly, consider the history of priesthood and its psychological effects.

Let's go excavating. From the most ancient of recorded histories, priests have prospered alongside the ruling class, including present times. In every civilization recorded, priests of one god or another have been revered and privileged, oftentimes more revered than the rulers, or super-revered whenever they became rulers themselves. After all, don't all priests have access to supernatural forces? Since every one in power wants and needs to know the will, intentions, and future plans of these forces, those who have this information are worth their weight in gold - not to mention their ability to sway the minds of those forces to the ruler‘s advantage. Conflicts within those civilizations arose from the struggles for power amongst the priests representing their gods. Interestingly, priesthood is its own political system, practicing psychological manipulation of human wants and desires for answers. Priesthood has been very clever in giving “explanations” to assuage those needs.“

For the fearful and incurious, priests have exploited the childish belief that an individual’s thoughts, wishes, feelings and fantasies influence and cause events in the natural world. And the priests assert the same “attributes” to supernatural figures. In reality, despite what goes on in the child or childlike mind, only actions matter. Good and evil are the results, in human relations, of actions alone, not thoughts or desires. In every religion, gods are exempted; neither do morals apply to the gods and their spokesmen, but to underlings designated by the priests.

Here's my take on how the priestly system started and evolves, and why it continues to be perpetuated. Once upon a time, either by curiosity or accident, someone had bizarre dreams or stumbled upon a hallucinogenic plant, fungus, or fermented fruit, and ate some of it. Perhaps the person or persons lived above a naturally occurring noxious gas leak in the ground or cave nearby and continually inhaled it. The doors of perception were altered or flung wide open and ”revelations” ensued. That person had access to another ”realm of reality” and revealed some of the revelations to others, unaware of how such “mystical wisdom” and “truth” was acquired. When enough gullible and innocent people listened and believed these soothsayers and their predictions because they were thirsty for explanations, they were hooked in, and priests became very important for their connections to the gods.

Those in power took these seers into their keeping for advice and for divine power by proxy and “spiritual” osmosis. Priests who found they had access to herbal remedies could add incantations to the gods to the herbs, and claim that their interventional powers alone cured diseases. Any priests who discovered or had certain plants or fungi affecting the brain or nervous system could even cure or ease the pains of the dying, using magic prayers as the reasons for the results. (For examples: prayers and certain tree bark, i.e., aspirin, or a certain fruit's juice to prevent pregnancy, another to induce fertility, with prayers added.) Religious “miracles” were nothing more than medical cures, hypnosis, hallucinations, and placebos, with prayers and gods getting the credit. (Some things never change.)

Over time, exploiting the fears and hopes of their believers, powerful clerical influences increased and even dominated societies. Wars were fought on their advice, with the sanction and demands of their gods. Sacrifices of labor, time, money, were made to guarantee the god’s favors, appease their wrath, and to escape punishment for whatever their spokesmen know offends those gods.

In present times this is still tradition, and the gods of the past have been replaced by morphing the present “God” to fit the needs of “His” spokesmen. But it's still the same religio-political combo. Clergy are still telling those in power what the god of their choice wants, even in democracies where those elected to power should be listening to the voices of the electorate instead. Prayers and invocations are still made to a deity in states and the Capitol of the United States, by clergy who know the existence and will of their god as well as their pagan predecessors did their gods, and all of them with the same evidence for their existences. Clergy are consulted in matters of national importance today, as moral authorities and reps of divine favor, just as they have always been, and with reverence, privilege and special access. Clergy hold so much political power today that they have convinced their trusting and gullible followers, as they did in the past, to vote as they are told to.

Science has to be the greatest threat to priestly power and prestige with all those rational explanations and evidence to prove that natural disasters are the result of natural forces, for example; tsunamis, earthquakes, blizzards, volcanoes erupting, etc. Think of advances in medicine alone. Viruses and bacteria cause diseases, not sins. DNA, sometimes by heredity, but never by inherited sins, causes physical deformities. Damaged or absent brain cells are responsible for evil actions, delusions, and the gradual disappearance of the soul in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FMRI scans show us the effects of meditation, drug interactions, delusions, and poisons on the brain. With science we can electrically cause “out-of-body” experiences. (Why, even placebos have been shown to be as effective as prayers.) There are evolutionary explanations for just about everything in living things, and more are being discovered each hour.

All the traditional “reasons” to maintain respect for clergy are not there anymore, because they were based not on knowledge, but ignorance. Even “things that go bump in the night” aren’t frightening and in need of priestly interpretations anymore. Their authority and power are threatened by scientific facts. Science (“scientia” means “knowledge”) teaches that knowledge is power. Religion “teaches” that ignorance is bliss. One is liberating and fright-dispersing, and the other depends on fear and the refusal to go where one is not supposed to go as ordained by the god or gods. Science goes there, while clergy recapitulate superstitions of the past and get the powers that be to bow down to them. One finds answers; the other makes them up. One brings humankind out of needless fears; the other creates them and exploits those already there for its own parasitical survival. Those great priests of tradition are become placebo dispensers and entertainers. Some of them have become buffoons for our ridicule and disgust.

One day in the far future our times will be “excavated.” Will those excavators make the same conclusions we do today? They may conclude: “Look at this: even they still believed in gods and their spokesmen, just like the ancient Egyptians, Etruscans, Sumerians, Babylonians, Aztecs, Mayans, etc., etc. . . And they were just as taken in by them. What exploitation, what resources and labors were wasted on priestly pleasures, and on temples, pyramids, and cathedrals while the people starved, toiled, and in other ways suffered needlessly. If only they had had the guts to go where the clergy told them not to go!“


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro