Skip to main content

An Outsider's Perspective on Religion

By Harry J. Bentham ~

Some people are scared to abandon a religion because it would make them “wrong” – meaning it would place them in disagreement with a bunch of people around them. But this article comes from someone raised as an atheist in Britain, where religion is increasingly irrelevant and no-one cares. Unlike most other British people, I have never participated in any religious activity whatsoever, meaning I only ever had the chance to study religion as an outsider. This gives me an unusual perspective, which I think is worth sharing here.

I come from a completely atheist background, which doesn’t mean I come from a background with any anti-religious sentiment present in the household. My interest in religion appeared when, out of a background entirely sheltered from religious influence, I studied religious sects at school and later at university. From everything I have learned, I can only conclude that religions are culturally-built fear systems used to extract power and money from people who don’t know any better than to surrender to their own frailties.

Let me begin by saying what my present atheism means. I don’t accept any god claims. The specific God I had the most time to consider was the Christian one, due to the fact that Britain is by tradition Christian – and Christianity’s trappings still remain in school choirs, Christmas, etc. From the moment I started thinking about the alleged God of Christianity, it was evident to me that this God doesn’t exist. I knew this, because I was able to read the Bible which is the best evidence against God’s existence. The Bible is wrong on too many occasions to be given any more attention beyond the first few pages. However much value it still has, as a holy book along with other holy books, it just defies the basic facts a child should know. The Bible teaches that God is a magical person (Genesis 3:8 “walking in the garden”; Genesis 1:27 “created mankind in his own image”) who lives on clouds (Deuteronomy 33:26 “on the clouds in his majesty"), and this God acknowledges that he can easily be visited if we travel to the sky (Genesis 11:6 "nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them"). Yet aeroplanes, tall mountain routes and towers exist now and none of them have allowed us to go up and see God in the manner that the Bible established to be possible. If you do not believe me, climb a mountain or travel in an aeroplane with the intent to find what was described in the Bible. See for yourself, there is nothing up there but clouds.

I don’t think it is worth considering any kind of “invisibility” argument for God, or the “metaphor” argument. I have had these discussions before, and both are simply admissions that the Biblical God doesn’t exist and the person arguing is trying to invent a new one. Has God found a dark place beneath the Earth now, to hide from our blasphemous curiosity? If he is hiding in the dark, then this is only more evidence that he is not the Biblical God associated consistently with “light” and said to literally reside in the sky. “Light” also metaphorically indicates truth, meaning such a god would never conceal itself from our scrutiny. If the god reported to exist in a holy book cannot be found in its reported location and form, doesn’t this mean the holy book is mistaken? In my opinion, we didn’t even need to consider the question of this god’s existence any further after the time when early airships indisputably found he isn’t there. Claims of the Christian God’s existence now are not even on par with claiming there is a hot dog stand resting somewhere on Mars. Unlike the possible hot dog stand on Mars, some of us have already investigated the Christian God’s specified location and found nothing up there.

The only parts of the religions that ever had any persuading effects on me, as a child learning about them, were their various hells. This is because threats and scary descriptions actually have a great deal more emotional power over a child’s mind than god claims have. The Buddhist hells are the most bizarre and frightening, in which one of the less severe punishments is to end up as a fat creature with a mouth the size of a pinhole, roaming a wasteland for food that will never be found. These visions are obviously created with the intention to scare, much like the contents of horror movies. All people have an inherent dread at punishment for wrongdoing even in the absence of a possible punisher, because parents and authorities use all sorts of punishments to condition children to behave themselves. People who cause suffering in others also tend to end up suffering in some way, or are already suffering in some way, so the threat of after-death suffering or supernatural karma is no better for our morals than the threat of reality.

You can tell all religions are false by using the very watchmaker argument used to defend the idea of God, this time using the argument validly. I am walking along and I come across a religion. I instantly know the religion is man-made without any further evidence, because I have seen all sorts of other examples of religions that are man-made. For someone in the position of being an atheist for their whole life, every religion is equal and in each case they are obviously man-made. The evidence for the human invention of religion is so overwhelming that asking me to think a religion is true is like trying to sell me a really old watch by telling me that it wasn’t created by men but fell from a tree. We have new religions popping up all the time, some of them thriving like the Church of Scientology. It is likely that many new religions get created every year, but only a few of them manage to expand their membership very far. The establishment of a religion is much more complicated than the establishment of a corporation. Businesses can’t survive without customers, and religions can’t survive without believers. This echoes the manner in which the old pagan gods were said to need sacrifices and devotion, or else the gods would perish and the world would end. In essence, priests created imaginary parasites, obviously to cloud the reality that the priests were the parasites.

Even though it is clear to me that religions increasingly represent a menace to the modern world, most of mainstream religious belief is completely harmless and perhaps stops more dangerous forms of superstition. Therefore, someone can believe a religion for the right reasons. Similarly, someone can be an atheist for the wrong reasons. You are an atheist for the wrong reasons if you turned this way to deliberately alienate others in your community or offend someone, and you are an atheist for the wrong reasons if you are not also a skeptic. Skepticism requires using what Carl Sagan called a “baloney detection kit” (described in his book, "The Demon Haunted World"), and the kit involves several basic tests for immediately recognizing when a severely questionable claim is being presented. A lot of atheists are not aware of this, so they still succumb to illogical claims and obscurantism just because others are socially pressuring them. I think skepticism is more important than atheism. If someone accepts the Christian afterlife doctrine while remaining skeptical in every other domain, this is surely better than rejecting the Christian afterlife doctrine but remaining credulous when reacting to everything else.

Every religious denomination wants you to think it is the only one that has properly documented the “supernatural”. No matter what their benign proclaimed spiritual motives are, I think all these groups were created to defraud vulnerable people for power and money by exploiting superstitious terrors and confusions. If all the gods have failed to help us and they have all failed to show themselves, then there is no reason to keep pretending they are out there somewhere. It is good to wonder about forces beyond our current comprehension in the universe, but this is in the domain of science, and it is clear ancient texts are too often talking nonsense. But if arcane religious texts are authoritative, we should read Vedic scriptures rather than the Bible.



Popular posts from this blog

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi