Skip to main content

Only Human

By Carl S. ~

There's a special dispensation from liability reserved for clergy. It goes by the name, "He's only human." It explains why a pastor, who has been in one or more adulterous relationships (while preaching, at the same time, virtue and honesty to his congregation), is forgiven: he's only a human sinner. Somewhere behind this is the empathy of, "If I was in his position with his power, I might do the same."

Christians used to have a saying, "Not perfect, but forgiven." Maybe it's because people didn't know how to interpret what it meant that led to its demise. Nobody's perfect, so what's the point, and doesn't being forgiven make you superior to the rest of us unforgiven ones? Doesn't forgiveness give you free reign to be "not perfect" in the future? This may be one more example of us vs. them, or rather, we vs. you. Being not perfect is, I'm guessing, supposed to be an admission of humility.

Since the beginning of religions on down to the present time, priests of every god have preached humility before the god. Dogmas preach humans are created to bow down, admit their sins, and beg forgiveness of the god. They must prostrate their Wills to the god, admit they are continually either offending or in danger of offending the god. If they do not, they would be punished by the god or his representatives on earth. (Remember, the original sin of three religions is that of knowing, meaning a will to be as god.) This is what has passed for "humility" for eons, and is held up as highly virtuous by religions. (The word “Islam" means "submission.")

Religions teach that humility means becoming obedient children of god, of becoming as a child to enter heaven, that we all are children of god. But, as one nurse told another when looking at the uncovered body of a young patient, "This is no boy, this is a man." Real humility is admitting we're adults. To explain:

The original meaning of the word "humility" has no religious connection. It refers to an honest self-assessment of one's place in nature and among other humans. There is nothing self-degrading nor arrogant in this attitude. In fact, it can include a realization one knows more than, or is better at making decisions than others. It can also mean that one recognizes that one might not even have average qualities. It means looking around and experiencing that one's not that much different than anyone else in not only achieving, but in screwing up. (And that others are merely better at covering up their mistakes than you are.) Inasmuch as you can be objective about yourself, it is a method of determining whether you are lying to yourself or not.

Religions have seized on the human need for group identity and used it to their advantage. They have created group/ cults that societies identify with, with the added benefit for clerics of demanding loyalty and a relationship on a par with that toward the god. The cult identity becomes so strong that when one leaves it, one is considered a traitor and immoral.

“I know in my heart it's true, therefore it is," or "You can't test, or judge, or question god." But doesn't that mean, "It's what I believe, so don't question or test or judge me?"Religious/group/cult membership has made for itself a "special humility" unrelated to honest assessment of the individual's place in nature, amongst other members of the human race, etc. This it replaces with the god-given vain and arrogant "us versus them" mentality. It elevates belief- membership to a virtue. (As one woman would say, "What's so virtuous about that?" It's a comment I keep finding very useful whenever I hear of religious forces at work.)

Religious "humility," compared with honest humility, is like comparing scientific fact-finding to belief in the illogical. The scientific method, for example, admits new evidence even if it contradicts current understandings, and rejects the old in accepting the new. This is not only "humble" but what currently is referred to as "humbling." Religious humility, on the other hand, gives rise to such well-known religiously-impregnated aphorisms as, “I know in my heart it's true, therefore it is," or "You can't test, or judge, or question god." But doesn't that mean, "It's what I believe, so don't question or test or judge me?"

People who say they have faith really mean they hope. Those who say, "I believe" are really saying, "I hope," and when they say," I'll pray for you," what they really mean is," I'll hope you recover." Their faith in salvation, in heaven, their savior, their prayers being answered, etc., all mean that their gut-feeling hope makes these things true. It's hope. Gambling. When gospel Jesus says, "Anything you ask for in my name shall be given you" (The realist scoffs: "You hope."), it's wishful faith, of "When you wish upon a star...your dreams come true." People don't want to give up their personal faith because they fear their personal hope will leave. It's really silly, but it's what humans do.

Of course, there is: "No amount of evidence will convince me my beliefs could be wrong," or, "No amount of evidence will convince me to (even) think differently." That's not being humble, but it has everything to do with personal feelings, which can include real fear of knowing otherwise. These two feelings, that of inexplicable inner "knowing," and fear, determine how much control the cleric and tyrant and dictator have over their followers. What's so virtuous about that?

Virtue and religion. Do the true believers automatically assume merely believing confers virtuous status? Apparently so, judging by their actions. In that assumption, many non-virtuous attitudes and injustices are forgiven and/or overlooked.

Ray Norris, in writing about an evidence-based world in which beliefs are replaced by working hypotheses, says: "Racism, sexism, and all the other nasty-isms could probably not survive without belief. Unless I believe I'm superior to you, it's very difficult justifying killing you, or discriminating against you."

Look around the world and you'll find beliefs poisoning everything. Of course, that's only my humble opinion. I'm only human. I do not know in my heart that god wants me to destroy unbelievers and infidels, that women are inferior to men in every way, that god demands that I deny essential healthcare to women and girls because the clinics that provide such care may also provide abortions. I am not a reincarnation of a god who spouts platitudes and lives off the fruits of other people’s labors. I am not the holy man who speaks for god while wearing a "Conehead" hat and a dress, or who believes that his very words have just changed a cracker into a living man who died two thousand years ago. I'm a humble realist.


Popular posts from this blog


By David Andrew Dugle ~ O ctober. Halloween. It's time to visit the haunted house I used to live in. When I was five my dad was able to build a big modern house. Moving in before it was complete, my younger brother and I were sleeping in a large unfinished area directly under the living room. It should have been too new to be a haunted house, but now and then I would wake up in the tiny, dark hours and see the blurry image of a face, or at least what I took to be a face, glowing, faintly yellow, high up on the wall near the ceiling. I'm not kidding! Most nights it didn’t appear at all. But when it did show itself, at first I thought it was a ghost and it scared me like nothing else I’d ever seen. But the face never did anything; unmoving, it just stayed in that one spot. Turning on the lights would make it disappear, making my fears difficult to explain, so I never told anyone. My Sunday School teachers had always told me to be good because God was just behind m

The Blame Game or Shit Happens

By Webmdave ~ A relative suffering from Type 1 diabetes was recently hospitalized for an emergency amputation. The physicians hoped to halt the spread of septic gangrene seeping from an incurable foot wound. Naturally, family and friends were very concerned. His wife was especially concerned. She bemoaned, “I just don’t want this (the advanced sepsis and the resultant amputation) to be my fault.” It may be that this couple didn’t fully comprehend the seriousness of the situation. It may be that their choice of treatment was less than ideal. Perhaps their home diabetes maintenance was inconsistent. Some Christians I know might say the culprit was a lack of spiritual faith. Others would credit it all to God’s mysterious will. Surely there is someone or something to blame. Someone to whom to ascribe credit. Isn’t there? A few days after the operation, I was talking to a man who had family members who had suffered similar diabetic experiences. Some of those also suffered ea

Reasons for my disbelief

By Rebekah ~ T here are many layers to the reasons for my disbelief, most of which I haven't even touched on here... When I think of Evangelical Christianity, two concepts come to mind: intense psychological traps, and the danger of glossing over and missing a true appreciation for the one life we know that we have. I am actually agnostic when it comes to a being who set creation in motion and remains separated from us in a different realm. If there is a deistic God, then he/she doesn't particularly care if I believe in them, so I won't force belief and instead I will focus on this one life that I know I have, with the people I can see and feel. But I do have a lot of experience with the ideas of God put forth by Evangelical Christianity, and am confident it isn't true. If it's the case god has indeed created both a physical and a heavenly spiritual realm, then why did God even need to create a physical realm? If the point of its existence is to evolve to pas

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two