Skip to main content

Why Did the Christian God "Wait?"

By Ben Love ~

Okay, so Adam and Eve have just eaten from the tree. Sin has entered the world. Human beings are now forever separated from God. Upon their physical death, they are subject to everlasting spiritual death as well, since it takes only one sin to earn eternal damnation. A sad state of affairs, to be sure. Let us, for the moment, ignore the fact that God knew all of this was going to happen anyway. Let us ignore that he pretty much wanted it to happen, given the fact that he orchestrated these events so that it was inevitable. Let us also recall that God apparently had the provision of Jesus Christ planned from the very beginning. In other words, even as God was shooing his two new humans into the Garden of Eden and giving them their instructions about which tree to avoid, he already knew they would eat of the tree and thus he already knew that a part of himself, his “Son,” would ultimately pay the price for the resulting sin, thus saving humanity.

No argument here, right? Okay.

Now, the question is this: Why did God wait? Who not act immediately? Why not send Jesus to Earth right there and then in the Garden of Eden? Why banish Adam and Eve and then allow for a few more thousand years of separation between God and man? Wouldn’t it have made more sense to send Jesus to Earth immediately and have Adam and Even do the honors of killing him (since someone had to die, remember; someone had to be murdered)? After all, that would have had the added benefit of allowing the story to be passed down to every human being who would ever be born. A much more effective method, this, and yet the Christian God opted for a method that specifically ensured the exclusion of billions of people. By waiting until the appearance of the Roman Empire before sending the solution to Earth, this allegedly wise God purposefully allowed the entire planet to be populated by peoples unreachable for several more centuries. If Christianity is true, then one must wonder why God wasn’t a bit more careful about his timing. Or, to ponder an even darker possibility, one must wonder why God wanted some of his creations to miss the boat.

One must wonder why God wanted some of his creations to miss the boat.This simply don’t make any sense. And here again the Christian will say, “Well, you can’t out-think God. He must have had his reasons. Who are you to try and understand the ways of God?” This is utter rubbish. It is our job as humans to think carefully about everything we come into contact with; anything else is irresponsible. We as inhabitants of this planet have a duty to those who come after us, a duty to increase our knowledge in the hopes of our species avoiding the mistakes of the past. The Christian, however, would disagree, it seems. To the Christian, we must think only up to the point that our thinking brings us to God. At that point, our thinking must cease and we should allow God to lead the way. Never mind the fact that this God is unproven and needs to be taken on faith. No, even then, we must allow this unseen, unproven, alleged God make our decisions for us. And, big surprise, humans from all over the globe assert differing agendas from this very same God.

Regarding my question as to why God would wait to send Jesus, one woman said the following to me: “Doesn’t God, as God, have the right to set things up in whatever manner he chooses?” In other words, her response is that, since God is God, he can do whatever he likes, and we just have to lump it. I feel this demonstrates one of the key failures of theism. On the one hand, the theist asserts that God has revealed himself as this, that, and the other. But on the other hand, the theist uses God’s apparent omnipotence to allow him a blank check to be whatever he wants to be. You cannot have both. If God is God, then he is bound to act only in ways that coincide with his nature. He cannot violate himself. If God is love, he cannot act out of hate. If God is patient, he cannot behave impatiently. If God is kind, he cannot embody cruelty. God is therefore not free to do whatever he wants. God must act in ways that affirm who he is rather than contradicting and violating who he apparently is. Thus, he cannot erect a system that violates his love, kindness, generosity, or even his wisdom. On these grounds alone, the Christian God cancels himself out as counterfeit and the religion as a whole ceases to possess the perfection its adherents think it has.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro