Skip to main content

The Shackles of Sin

By John Shores ~

In the Christian vernacular, "sin" carries currency of some sort. "The wages of sin" is one phrase that supports this notion. The idea that "Jesus died to save you from the consequences of your sin" also sounds rather like a rich uncle bailing out a nephew who is deeply in debt.

What makes this currency of sin somewhat nefarious is that in the Christian worldview sin is not in fact the same thing as behaving immorally. In Matthew 5, Jesus states that things such as anger and lust are up for "sin" status and can land one at the judgment seat.

This idea of elevating thoughts and natural impulses to the status of "sins" really crosses any lines of reasonableness.

Born in sin?

Christian doctrine is founded on the idea that humans have a "sin nature." What does that mean?

If you read Romans 7 ("…For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want...."), you get the picture of an extremely tortured soul.

One does not get the sense that Paul is trying to suppress an insatiable desire to torture puppies or to burn down orphanages. Rather, his struggle is against his thoughts ("inner man").

Said another way, he struggled against being human.

Contrary to Christian doctrine, our default nature is not immoral. We have succeeded as a species because of innate qualities like cooperation, fairness, and reciprocity.

By nature, we care about the other members of the group. As we grow we come to understand that the group is important to our survival.

There are certainly some things that cause damage to both the group and individual members of the group. We have identified these things and given them a label of "immoral" or at least "unlawful."

The Christian doctrine of sin, if accurate, would have to be stated as, "By nature, we all want to do that which will harm the group." But this is not the case.

No human is born a racist or a murderer. Humans mimic by nature. Hence those things that plague us (racism, tribalism, religious adherence) are things that are taught. They are not part and parcel to human nature.

Being Human is Bad

Being horny is a normal human condition. Re-label it as "lust" and it suddenly becomes something sinister.

Anger is another common human quality. No normal person can go through life without experiencing it. And yet this is also a sin in the Christian vernacular.

The Christian message can be summed us as: "You are a piece of shit. Our remedy is your only hope."Telling someone that he's an idiot is perhaps the most common of the human communications (certainly on social media). But according to Jesus, to say such a thing is enough to land you in Hell.

The reality is that Christian doctrine seeks to neuter a person of all that makes him or her human.

They call it "elevating mankind." The reality is that Christian doctrine criminalizes human nature.

You is Kind. You is smart. You is important.

The Christian message can be summed us as: "You are a piece of shit. Our remedy is your only hope."

Is it any wonder that Paul was completely neurotic? (I was too, for over four decades!)

Tell people that they are good, that they are smart, and that they are important and watch what happens.

Rather than behaving morally to escape some punishment, people behave well so that they don't disappoint themselves or those whose opinion matters to them. To know that one has done something to benefit humanity is one of the loftiest motivators.

Add to this a heaping dose of realism. Your natural impulses are not in and of themselves evil. You are not full of "sin." You are full of chemicals and electrical activity in your brain.

It is not what you think but how you behave that matters.

Arrogance and Condemnation

My first year of college, I was approached by one of my classmates about midway through the year. He told me that he was gay.


"OK," I replied.

"I'm not hitting on you or anything," he said. "It's just that I know you're a Christian and I wanted to see how you'd respond."

"Well, Jesus hung out with the sinners and outcast you know, so I don't see any reason why I should judge you," I replied.

As noble as that may sound, it isn't. I thought I was being benevolent and liberal. In fact, I had just labeled that guy as a "sinner." I had judged him and my response was in fact arrogant and condescending.

As an ex-Christian I can see that now. As a Christian, I could not.

There Has To Be A Better Way

Is this belief system that is predicated on the idea of "sin" really the best we can do?

Isn't it better to accept that people are essentially people without twisting that into meaning something bad?

Isn't it better to elevate people, to tell them that they can do great things, and to encourage them to do their best in this world?

Telling them that they are sinners is shackling them from the outset.

People do not need to be freed from the shackles of sin. They need to be freed from the superstition that uses the label of "sin" to enslave them.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro