Skip to main content

The Christian God is Evil

By John Shores ~

Talking to a Christian about the character of God is always tiresome. What troubles me the most is how quickly so many dismiss anything in the Old Testament as being irrelevant. It is as if they think "that was God before he went through rehab, but now he's really a nice guy." To me, this is like watching a video of Hitler playing with a puppy and thinking, "Aw, how sweet!"

If one was to do a profile of this god, what sort of person would we be looking at? The Old Testament god is just too easy a target. So let's see what this new and improved god of the New Testament is like.

A Kinder, Gentler God…

Let's begin with the Book of the Acts of the Apostles. In chapter five we find an account that never fails to astonish me.

The scene: A congregational meeting

The sermon: "Jesus died for your sins. Repent therefore!"

In the midst of this "Repent therefore" sermon, Peter is working himself into frenzy. His message is about the love of god and the horrible things that Jesus suffered through so as to reconcile man to god.

He sees Ananias walk in and remembers looking over the offering ledger that morning. Ananias and his wife sold their house for 45,000 sheckles and gave it to the church. But Asaph, their realtor who was also on the board of deacons, clicked his tongue.

"What?" Peter inquired.

"Well, they sold the place for 47,000 sheckles," Asaph reports.

"Not 45?"


"Lying bastards."

Peter is pissed. He sees Ananias walk into the congregation, stops in mid-sermon and asks, "Ananias, did you sell your property for 45,000 sheckles?"

Ananias replies, "Yeah."

"Liar! Liar liar liar! Death!" and Ananias drops dead at the hand of god.

Repeat for his wife, who also drops dead at the hand of god.

Uh huh. OK. So, Jesus died for their sins but somehow God decided that lying about one's finances is now a capital crime?

Come on.

…As Opposed to the OT God

Let's contrast this against the god of the Old Testament for a moment.

A guy named David who god really liked. This man committed adultery, killed the husband and married the woman. So God sent a prophet to tell the man that god was going to kill his innocent infant for David's crimes.

Commit adultery and murder, an innocent dies.

Lie about money, you die.

Uh huh.

Dare we inquire further into the character traits of this Old Testament god; multiple genocides, multiple infanticides, sending people off into slavery for not paying him any attention, and on and on?

"But God Is Good!"

Surely there must be some good qualities about this character?

After all, he did create the Garden of Eden. But then he set a trap for the people who had no idea what they were doing. Then he condemned all of future humanity with a sin-birth-defect as a result of these two committing a what? Mistake? Not a crime, surely.

Hold on a sec. One of my reasonable Christian friends just reminded me that the whole fall of man thing is just an allegory to try to explain that people are basically sinful… Wait, say what? God starts out by telling humans that they are basically defective? That's messed up.

But even the attempt to makeover his image, with Jesus as he marketing director, is fraught with some pretty awful revelations.

As Jesus is delivering his most famous sermon about how blessed the meek and the peacemakers are, he throws in an entirely new concept: eternal damnation.

Excuse me? The OT god would just kill people and that was that. Now he's tormenting them forever? That's f---ed up.

And if we look a little closer at this same sermon, we find that it's not just what you do but what you think that will get you heaved into this pit of eternal fire? Thought crimes?! Really?


As a final, desperate attempt to make it all OK, we are told that this god person became a virgin human sacrifice so that he could appease himself for the sins committed by the people who he created with the sin-birth-defect. As a consequence, these scum heads can live with him in eternal bliss.

Dude, that is so whack.

(Of course, he did rise from the dead. So, essentially, Jesus had a really bad weekend for your sins*.)

Rational Conclusions

I think we can safely say that this god person is criminally insane.

Anyone care to disagree?

Now, honestly, this is the god Christians want us to believe in?

I'm sorry but I simply don't have enough evil in me to ascribe this level of evil to a deity, any deity.

Never mind that they want us to believe that this person is "good"" or "love itself." He hasn't even risen to the level of "sane" or "decent person."

Isn't it far better to believe in no deity than to believe in one who is by word and deed the very antithesis of all that we hold to be morally sound?

Thank goodness there are so many Christian apologists out there. The Christian god has a lot to apologize for.

*I would love to take credit for this but I can't. I don't remember where I saw this summation but it has stuck with me and I thought I'd share.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not