Skip to main content

The path well-worn: my voyage to apostasy

By SingleOrigin ~

It’s a curious and disquieting feeling, letting go of a worldview you've grown in to. But to emerge from months and years of internal discussion, evaluation and introspection is a unique experience that I am glad I had.

Long-time lurker, here. I've been subscribed with Ex-Christian for several months now, but until now haven’t mustered up the motivation to put things to the page. Reading through the myriad stories and extimonies on this website has been informative and instrumental in my (somewhat) meandering slide out of Christendom. It’s always a delight to read insights from a broad range of experiences, backgrounds and individual personalities – and to at once see the incredible singularity, but also multitude nuances which make up deconversion accounts. Singular in the sense that similar themes are repeated almost universally, and diverse in that no one experience is truly alike. So with that gushing preamble aside, I shall share my own reflection on deconversion and the (ongoing) fallout that it entails.

Unlike some de-converts, my own transition to apostasy has been comparatively trauma-free. My deconversion was not spurred by a horrible experience or mistreatment by Christians, and in fact most of the Christians I have the privilege of knowing are well-rounded and engaging people. I was raised to follow the teaching of the bible in the Baptist denomination – which, in Australia, retain a lot of individual flavor when it comes to theology and doctrine. It was a reasonably innocuous affair – while we were taught evangelical principles and had quite a conservative theology – the aging population of my particular church did not place much emphasis on personal accountability when it came to preaching to non-believers (a fact which suited me quite well in the raging tempest of teen years and associated peer pressure to appear “cool”). My mother always was more upfront about her faith, while my father was pragmatic and preferred to help other people than outright preach to them. I participated in my fair share of holiday programs, both as an attendee and a volunteer helper – and participated in one too many embarrassing skits (suffice it to say, my acting career was DOA). I attended the local public high-school of about 1200 students, and led a sufficiently normal life – the strictures of fundamentalist theology never really took a hold of me (a fact that I am now thankful for) so my turning away from the faith nearly felt like a natural progression.

As it happens, my deconversion almost resembles that tired cliché of the “slippery slope” – only more “gentle gradient” than “steep descent”. In a sense, Christians are correct to fear the consequences of the slippery slope – once the seed of scepticism has taken hold in a sufficiently fertile and open mind, the outcome is generally linear in progression. I was always particularly bright, and did well in all my schoolwork. I relished the challenge of advanced mathematics (well, advanced for a secondary school level), and loved the mental exercise of physics classes. Not being well-versed in biology, however, meant that I also took great joy in devouring the monthly issues of Creation Ex-Nihilo, a magazine released by Creation Ministries International (the Australian off-shoot of Answers in Genesis). ( I felt at the time that it equipped me with a solid refutation of the wrong-headed evolution and modern cosmology. (As an aside, I didn't let an opportunity pass up to sneak in creationist rhetoric to high-school oral assignments – perhaps my only passable attempt at proselytizing, thankfully).

The first proverbial flap of the butterfly wings came when on a visit to my grandparents. My grandfather was a reasonably nice, agreeable man with a penchant for eschatology and literal interpretation of the bible. He would thoroughly pore over the entire bible to piece together themes, overarching narratives, directives and responsibilities of Christians living in modern times. Despite hopping from church to church whenever it was discovered they had incorrect doctrine, I saw him as a role-model – his rigorous study of the bible was something that I found lacking in other Christians I knew. So it came as the biggest surprise when on a visit to their place, I picked up a book he was reading, titled “A Biblical Case for an Old Earth” ( by David Snoke. It was an incredibly profound moment, because instead of dismissing it outright as I normally would have, I decided to borrow it for myself - thus laying the foundations for my embryonic scepticism. Looking back, I think it was the combination of the biblical framing of the topic and coming from a person I highly respected which disarmed me just long enough to let the new ideas in. I must say that this one book had perhaps the entirely opposite effect that the author was aiming for. I read it avidly, and the accompanying letter from my Grandpa which encouraged me to read with caution and thoroughness, to avoid the pitfalls of incorrect theology (I wish I could find this letter, as it contains a very out-of-character openness that I have never seen in my Grandpa since – curiously encouraging me to question established beliefs, but to assess the claims of the author against scripture).

I summarily took that experience and…did nothing with it for several years. Arriving at university, and marking my departure from my parent’s home, I began to unfurl the latent doubt and questions which had surreptitiously accumulated since reading that book. I joined at local Baptist church in the city I moved to for study, one which had a particularly open and liberal bent – focusing on acceptance and community rather than mandating particular doctrine. In my first two years there, I grew to take up leadership positions within the youth service, and also the youth group run for high-school aged children. I also joined a guy’s “small group” (euphemism for bible study), which had lively discussion about pertinent topics from a broad range of individual beliefs, running the gamut from far-right evangelical fundamentalism to borderline secular-liberal. I have fond memories of this group, because it encapsulated an aspect of Christianity that is rarely seen – genuine debate about belief and theology which didn't immediately devolve into a mud-slinging match. We maintained civil and thought-provoking dialogue and we all left with positive attitudes, despite our individually held beliefs. This also seemed to summarize the atmosphere of the church as a whole, so needless to say it was actually quite enjoyable being a part of that community. It has been quite unpleasant to drift from this encouraging and welcoming environment, and lose contact with the people I befriended there (also due in part to relocating to another suburb for work purposes).

The real catalyst for my newly developed apostasy came when I started my first relationship with my (now) girlfriend of two years. Despite praying together early on, developing arbitrary rules about sexual contact (my own imposition, not hers) and generally trying to uphold Christian virtues in our partnership, the strain of trying to repress sexual feelings became too much to ignore. I began delving in to the prohibitions of Pauline theology, and tried to mount a case for healthy sexual expression while maintaining my Christianity. It isn't the only reason why I fell from faith, but it certainly jump-started in earnest the questioning habits that would lead me to where I am now.

My rapidly dismounting faith went through several permutations in rapid succession, which I’ll skip over here for brevity. The salient point is: I repeatedly asked the question “Why do I believe what I believe? What is the reason behind it?” – and decided not to console myself with the usual platitudes but to really answer with honesty and integrity. Almost at once, I recognized the lack of response to sincere efforts to communicate with God. It seemed bizarre to look back on; that I would prop up one-sided conversations to the point of frustration. I never understood the notion “think with your heart, not your head”, and in general lacked what some would call “spiritual atunement”. What previously would have led me to further growth in faith only highlighted the lack of presence of God in my life. I dismantled my perception of prayer, in a similar fashion to this video:( I could no longer reconcile the gross injustices of this world with the absurd contradiction of a God who reportedly values us higher than anything else.

The online resources at my disposal had helped me along considerably – I encountered this website; the exemplary YouTube videos of Evid3nc3 (a particular favorite), TheraminTrees, QualiaSoup, PrplFox; and a plethora of debates between Christian apologists and proponents of atheism (even when I still considered myself a Christian, I saw the apologists arguments were laughably anaemic). I unearthed an incredible video on YouTube based (I think) on lectures by Dr Jack Szostak on the topic of abiogenesis ( To a biology layman such as myself, it just made things click. I voraciously consumed books by Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett and recently, Christopher Hitchens (yes, very typical, I know – but they are mainstays for a reason). I subscribed to Scientific American, New Scientist and took some university elective subjects on geology and cosmology; I attempted to assimilate as much information as I possibly could.

In general, I am now in a position to further develop and hone just how I want to live out my new found atheism. I suspect something along the lines of secular humanism is a good fit for where I want to be ideologically. On a personal note, I am still finding the words to inform my family and friends of my experience – and dreading the anticipated response, particularly from my mum. I have fully divulged my deconversion to my girlfriend (moderate Christian), and while it creates tension and misunderstanding on both sides, we rise above the difference. We made a concerted effort from the very start to build our relationship on mutual trust, honesty and respect – which has been hard won and helped us weather the brunt of such large changes in my worldview.

Closing off a train of thought brought up earlier, I would agree with fundamental Christians in one aspect: liberal Christianity is a slippery slope. I see it as positive, where they would regard it as negative. I have come to see liberal Christianity as an inherently volatile stance – at once having to reconcile and poeticize the more unsavoury elements of the bible; and trying to live an ethical life while holding on to a largely redundant faith. In trying to be the middle-ground between outright atheism and hard-line religiosity, it inherits the advantages of neither. That was the path I lead for a little while, and I arrived at secularism in the end, and for the better.

I am thankful that the process has lacked the distress and trials that some go through – my heart goes out to those abused by institutions, individuals and dogma – our destinations and paths may differ, but it’s great to be united by the common thread which weaves through all our stories.

Thanks for trudging through this long-winded spiel (goddamn, someone get me an editor!); it’s good to get it off my chest, and I hope you've gained something by reading it!


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two