Skip to main content


By Carl S ~

After all these centuries, there is still an implied respect expected for religious beliefs; no matter how ridiculous they are, they should be treated as sacrosanct, and gods forbid, never criticized. Recently, even the U.S. President went public to announce to the world that his country respects the Islamic faith, even as believers destroyed U.S. property abroad after hearing of a film trailer allegedly offensive about Mohammed. Yes, the President is supposed to represent every citizen, but obviously didn't at the time - we doubt most Americans "respect" Islam, since most of us don't have any idea of what it deeply implies, nor care to know. The Islamic believers probably have more knowledge of Christianity than the other way around.

While the world watched the hair-trigger reactions of those believers to a silly film trailer and silly cartoons, the smartasses who made them are in trouble? Something is wrong with this picture, if they are. What's scary is not that "God is great," but that god isn't, and "his" people are out there, again, doing "his" dirty work for him. Nope, no fiery rain from the skies or earthquakes swallowing up the enemies of god. Funny, isn't it, that words and sketches are more powerful than the all-powerful? All you need to do is start asking child-observation questions about particular beliefs, and the hairs stand up on the backs of believers. Some become militant, others just walk away, insult your character, morals, intelligence; in short, avoid answering. A little more civilized than firing up embassies, killing innocent people, but understandable to believers of faiths standing by, observing.

The English writer, Matthew Arnold, made a remark very heartening for us: "The freethinking of today is the common sense of tomorrow."I once wrote a letter to the editor about solutions. One of them pertained to problems in Islamic lands, namely sectarian violence. Why not, said I, all the sects meet together in a court, present their arguments and evidence for their truth-claims, and come to a meeting of the minds, and decide what they believe together is true? Surely, this would be better than killing each other. The letter was not accepted. Maybe he thought I was being a smart-ass. Maybe, though, it was too close to home. (Any believer could find his sect in that question.)

Religions in secular countries "agree to disagree,” in re beliefs. Sectarian strife has been replaced by a Christian militancy to dominate the ballot box, electing those who will do it's bidding, and for the rest of believers, well, it gets down to: believe what you want (anything), but believe in something. It’s important that you must believe; it doesn't matter WHAT that is. Think about it: that’s a faith in itself, having no more evidence for its claim than any other faith claim. All this is fine for the status-quo, but it leaves all non-believers out of the clique, second-class citizens, at best.

Enter the smartasses. We need to point out that, "Faith? Who needs it?" is real and works. Reason and logic do too, and there wouldn't be, for example, a United States if it weren't for those Enlightenment badasses in the first place. Thank badasses for voting rights, freedom of speech, all rights eventually fought for, one way or another.

It’s interesting to find out who your real friends are when you challenge ridiculous dogmas with logic and reasoning, and it tells you a lot about being an outsider to group-think. Nobody stones you to death or burns you alive, but you get the cold shoulder or anathema treatment just for pointing out something that doesn't make sense - even as the hearers know it doesn‘t. So, outside of the violent reactions in the Middle Eastern countries, the rationale is the same: faith prevails and the hell with your damned thinking and reasoning about things you really don’t understand because you don't have the true faith!

As the French say, "The more things change, the more they are the same.” Faith is the same everywhere. When it gets down to it, all faiths are true, right? They all want respect, obedience, no questions asked. If you challenge them, you are a smartass, and nobody likes smartasses. Or so it‘s claimed.

I like smartasses. They challenge conventional "wisdom," dogmas, traditions, the bland ordinariness of living without real change, coping, and thinking. George Carlin was one, Dawkins is another, and so was Darwin, and me, and probably, you. Nothing really gets changed that wasn't at one time or another instigated by a smartass to some degree. The reason I'm making such a big deal about this is, for one thing, religions are fragile and weak, albeit prevalent. Like all dictatorships, they are threatened by dispute and confrontation, the child-like questioning of them.

Notice that, for thousands of years, the smart alecks (as my mother called us), have been making progress as "freethinkers." The English writer, Matthew Arnold, made a remark very heartening for us: "The freethinking of today is the common sense of tomorrow." Sometimes, as in the scientific community with the announcement of a new theory, at first the challenger’s challenge is rejected, often ridiculed. Then the theory is gradually accepted, and then, the challenger is awarded merit. Such examples should embolden us to persist in our efforts to topple blind, irrational faiths and thinking.

As with new challenges to conventional scientific theories, challenges to traditional belief systems have been slowly but surely making their way into acceptability. We are living in an unprecedented point in human history, connected worldwide emotionally as well as by communication. The ridiculousness, hypocrisy, and dangers of religions are on display, and no one wants to be seen as close-minded, to themselves or others. There is hope in appealing to open-mindedness. All approaches are go: ridicule, reason, blasphemy, appeals to fairness, etc. ,whatever you think will get enough response to get people thinking rather than merely reacting. Use whatever you have, and hone your skills.

I'd rather get a reputation for being a smartass for challenging the status quo, as a gray-haired 74 year-old teenager, than be one of those really smartasses, in reality, who speak from the Vatican, the pulpit, the stages at Xtian rallies, the money-raking-in religion channels of religion, sold as "family" packages to Direct TV subscribers. They don't know, and embolden those who also don't know. All those quacks who represent thousands of years of strife with still NO proof of the existence of their god, whose god or Jesus never materializes, must be challenged, not respected. (What's with the "reverend" nonsense anyhow?) Let's keep making holes in the dam, and let them keep trying to plug them. Let's be kind and respectful of common sense, and never insult another's intelligence. Let us appeal to fairness and goodness towards one another, and thereby, gain respect and the trust we deserve. Let us make the indoctrination of unsuspecting children questionable - but let‘s not bite off more than we can individually chew. We can make, in our time, the freethought of today into the common sense of tomorrow Already it's happening for us.

As a smartass inheritor of the Enlightenment tradition, l persevere against ignorance and blind beliefs, as a missionary of freethought-freedom.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi