Skip to main content

In God We Trust . . . Really?

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

At this year’s Republican national convention, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) declared, “Our national motto is ‘In God we Trust,’ reminding us that faith in our Creator is the most important American value of all.” Sure, he was just trying to whip up the god believers behind the righteous cause of electing a god-fearing Republican as President. But he got me thinking. Is it true? Do we as a nation trust in god?

According to Rubio, belief in a god is a more important American value than freedom, honor, or anything else. Now that’s a strange notion, to my mind.

‘In God we Trust’ became the US motto in 1956 during the great communist scare whipped up by Senator Joseph McCarthy, apparently to differentiate us god-trusting Americans from those godless communists in the Soviet Union. In more recent times, in our religion-drenched Congress, the motto was reaffirmed (after brief debates) in 2002 and again last year. Apparently, it is absolutely vital that everyone understand that our nation trusts in god, so we have to be reminded again and again. In the House debate, Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) asked, “Is God God? Or is man God? In God do we trust, or in man do we trust?”

Good question, Representative Franks, let’s take a look at the evidence, shall we? When we say we trust in something or someone, we generally mean that we depend on that something or someone, and that appears to be what the originators of this motto meant. And clearly that’s what Rep. Franks meant.

So, do we depend on god to keep our country safe? Well, we have the biggest military in the world by far, accounting for nearly half of the whole world’s defense budget. We have 2,150 active nuclear warheads, and 11 aircraft carriers, with 3 more under construction, while no other country has more than 2 carriers. It doesn’t look like we are depending on god for our national defense.

We also have the Patriot Act, so named to ensure most Senators and Representatives would vote for it rather than be accused of being unpatriotic. This act allowed sweeping changes in our country’s intelligence gathering activities on our own citizens, most often in cases having nothing to do with terrorism. There’s not a lot of trust going on there.

Do we depend on god for winning our wars? Well, if we do, it hasn’t worked too well. Did we actually win in Korea or Viet Nam? Are we really “winning” in Iraq and Afghanistan? Actually, the size of our military budget already answers this question, but I wanted to show that if the believers are depending on god in any way to win our wars, then their faith is obviously misplaced.

So, we certainly aren’t depending on god for our national security. How about our health? There are almost 6,000 registered hospitals in the US, with nearly a million beds. In 2008, there were 661,400 physicians and surgeons in the US, and nearly 5 million other health care workers. So we aren’t depending on god for our health, either. We are depending on people and human institutions. Also, we have Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid for the poor.

How about the other emergencies of life? All states have unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation insurance, to provide some financial support if one loses a job or is injured on the job. And let’s not forget Food Stamps and municipal assistance for the needy. It doesn’t seem like we are depending on god in those areas either. Then, of course, we have rape and suicide hot lines and the 911 telephone system.

What do you think, if the average citizen is in trouble, does he pray or dial 911? Most people probably do both, but that’s exactly my point; he may or may not pray, but that average citizen ultimately puts his trust in man – despite what Rep. Franks says.

Jesus said (Matthew 6) that we shouldn’t worry about tomorrow, that god will take care of us. He said we should trust in god. Fortunately, we don’t, so we have Social Security, IRAs, 401k, and other retirement plans as well as health, dental, property, and life insurance. So who is trusting in god?

If you think about it, charities are solid proof that we count on people with means to help people with needs. If we really trusted in god, charities would be unnecessary. Of course, some believers would counter here that god is working THROUGH humans to help other humans, but that’s really beside the point. It’s still clearly the fact that we aren’t trusting in god to get the job done by himself. And what kind of third-rate god is it that needs our help to accomplish something?

So how can it be said that we are trusting in god? Can you name one thing that we actually leave in god’s hands? I can’t. And, if I’ve missed something, then it’s only the exception which proves the rule.

The motto, In God We Trust, disenfranchises atheists and agnostics since we don’t recognize gods. Does this mean we are unpatriotic? Apparently that’s what Bush the Elder thought when he said, "I don't know that atheists should be regarded as citizens, nor should they be regarded as patriotic. This is one nation under God."

Indeed, one of the worst things about religion is its divisiveness, separating people into them and us categories, which too easily translates into a them VERSUS us attitude, as shown in the recent riots in the Middle East over the Mohammed film. This is the danger inherent in mottoes like, “In God we trust.”

Perhaps the biggest reason it’s a lousy motto, though, and ought to be replaced, is not because it disenfranchises non-believers, but that it is simply not true; it ignores reality and promotes an illusion. The United States, as a country, doesn’t leave anything in the hands of god; we put everything in the hands of our people and our man-made institutions because we all know in our hearts, even the Christians, that we cannot really depend on god.


Popular posts from this blog

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi