Skip to main content

Providing or Proslelytizing

By Andy ~

This year, 2011, marks the 50th anniversary of the Peace Corps “promoting peace and friendship around the world.” Those are their own words describing their mission. As I read about this anniversary of doing good, helping people, creating friendships, I could not help but compare to the xtian concept of sending missionaries to “spread the gospel” around the world.

Peace Corps first mentionedImage by afagen via Flickr

I grew up in a fundamentalist, Christian home. I went to church school for my education beginning in the first grade and continuing through the completion of my Bachelors Degree. They attempted to brainwash me for virtually all of my growing up. Through all of that I always harbored doubts beginning with my earliest memories. Now I also had doubts about Santa Clause and you all know how that turned out. In my family I had one uncle who was a missionary to Africa and India, another who was a pastor and missionary to Vietnam and an Aunt who was a missionary to Mexico. I heard all of their stories of saving souls repeatedly, but something seemed to be missing.

Most, if not all, of the major xtian denominations support an army of missionaries that fan out around the world. The Baptist World Mission says they have missionaries in 47 countries. The LDS website states that they have “an average of 55,000 missionaries are proselyting in any given year.”(sic) The Seventh-Day-Adventists report to be in over 200 countries. Even that nut case Harold Camping has radio, shortwave and satellite broadcast capabilities around the world. And the Catholics; don’t even let me get started on that one. I can go on, but I think you get the idea. The big question is; what are they doing?

First off they are merely following the mandate of god. In Mark 16:15 it says “Then he said to them, as you go into all the world, proclaim the gospel to everyone.” (ISV) They are proselytizing! Oops, I mean saving souls for the lord. At least the LDS church came right out and said so. Xtians spend millions of hard earned dollars to build chapels and church schools in impoverished villages and towns that could have well used that money and a bit of knowhow to install a water delivery system or pave a critical road or build a bridge across a river that separates them from the outside world every rainy season. Instead of something of value they are given “the good news”. Maybe they build a much needed clinic, where, as they refuse to provide condoms in AIDS ravaged Africa, they tell the wretchedly sick people of a mythical better life in the hereafter. Where, if they are really good, they get to have a harp and watch Lions starve while not eating the sheep.

The real humanitarians of this world have been out there for fifty years now, making THIS world a better place. In Armenia volunteers held a multi day camp for children with disabilities, helping them find their special place in life and playing mind games to advance life skills. Not memorizing biblical passages. In Kazakhstan volunteers held camps that promote gender equality, empower young women and create a supportive environment for learning. Not espousing xtian dogma that pins “original sin” on women. Volunteers in Peru use the radio waves to teach thousands about their health and the environment. Not the impending doom being planned for us all by god. All of this good is done without adding to the desperate lives of these people a fear eternal damnation.

I have been told repeatedly that the old testament is the more authoritarian and violent part of god, but the new testament is the loving, compassionate side. I am sorry but it is the new testament that mandates this colossal waste of billions of humanitarian dollars; dollars that spread the good news about the hereafter rather than offer a helping hand in this world.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro