Skip to main content

Gospel of Thomas

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

I believe the most important test we can perform to verify the existence of any candidate god is to ask whether that god makes sense. Yes, this is a theme I have written on several times before over the years, but it’s important enough to bear repeating.

English: Image of the Last Page of the Coptic ...
English: Image of the Last Page of the Coptic Manuscript of the Gospel of Thomas. The title "peuaggelion pkata Thomas" is at the end. Courtesy of the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, Claremont Graduate University. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
For example, does a god who gets in a fit of anger and drowns everyone on earth except for one family make sense? Or, does an all-knowing, all-powerful and good god that allows 6 million people to be shot, gassed, or starved to death during the Holocaust make sense? Any clear-eyed assessment of these actions will find them immoral.

Of course, the apologists will bend logic into ridiculous shapes to try to justify these actions, but their defenses only make sense to the thoroughly indoctrinated.

Similarly, that god’s defenders will tell us that we shouldn’t expect to understand god’s actions with our puny brains. However, our puny brains are all we have to work with, and experience has shown that those who don’t use their brains are in the habit of making very big mistakes. And besides, while we may not be capable of great understanding, surely a real god can – and should - make himself understood by us. How else can we possibly eliminate the phonies?

Thousands of god candidates have vied for the worship of man down through history and prehistory, and no more than one of them (or very few) could be a real god. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the chances of any particular god being a real god are miniscule, and quite possibly zero.

So, how do we judge Zeus, Thor, Quetzalcoatl, Ra, Ganesh, Osiris, Marduk, Yahweh, and all the others? We should insist that their descriptions and their messages make sense. Often, since the supernatural is involved, the God’s message is given in cryptic form to appear like deep, esoteric wisdom that only the enlightened can properly interpret. I argue that man’s tendency to swallow high-sounding nonsense has led him astray over and over, and for this reason any real god would make his message crystal clear, and that message would contain unambiguous evidence of his existence. Any real god would know that in order to stand out from the crowd he must avoid looking anything like the gods that charlatan prophets have promoted over and over in thousands of cultures.

Recently, I came across the Gospel of Thomas, a non-canonical (not in the Bible) gospel discovered in Egypt in 1945 in a cache of numerous ancient Christian documents. Various scholars have dated the Gospel of Thomas anywhere from 40CE to 140CE. According to the experts, the author is unknown but probably not Thomas. The Gospel of Thomas differs from the canonical Gospels in that it does not tell stories, but is merely a collection of Jesus’ sayings and parables numbering 114.

The Gospel of Thomas proclaims that the Kingdom of God is already present for those who understand the secret message of Jesus (saying 113), and lacks apocalyptic (end of the world) themes. Because of this, Bart Ehrman argues the Gospel of Thomas was probably composed by a Gnostic sometime in the early 2nd century.

The reason I bring this up is that the Gospel of Thomas is a perfect example of the cryptic form I spoke of earlier. It is just dripping with deepities. Deepity is a word first used publicly by philosopher Daniel Dennett. A deepity is a statement that is apparently profound but actually asserts a triviality on one level and something meaningless on another.

I think the Gospel of Thomas is an excellent example of the seeming profundity that a real god would avoid. As I have said, the only kind of message that would stand out from all the thousands of false claims of false gods would be a clear message easily understood by the average human and containing clear evidence supporting its claims that could be easily verified. I believe it can be reasonably argued that, at this time, no known message of any god contains these markers of a genuine god.

To give a flavor of the Gospel of Thomas, I have created three categories of sayings; Familiar, Way Out, and Bonkers. Of course there is considerable overlap among these categories and my assignments are pretty arbitrary.


These are sayings that show up in the canonical Gospels, though usually in slightly different form. The following are examples of familiar sayings.

16. Jesus said, "Perhaps people think that I have come to cast peace upon the world. They do not know that I have come to cast conflicts upon the earth: fire, sword, war. For there will be five in a house: there'll be three against two and two against three, father against son and son against father, and they will stand alone."

48. Jesus said, "If two make peace with each other in a single house, they will say to the mountain, 'Move from here!' and it will move."

44. Jesus said, "Whoever blasphemes against the Father will be forgiven, and whoever blasphemes against the son will be forgiven, but whoever blasphemes against the holy spirit will not be forgiven, either on earth or in heaven."

26. Jesus said, "You see the sliver in your friend's eye, but you don't see the timber in your own eye. When you take the timber out of your own eye, then you will see well enough to remove the sliver from your friend's eye."


These sayings are weird in one way or another, their meanings often cryptic.

1. And he said, "Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death."

So, everlasting life is not a matter of just believing or good works, it’s also solving these puzzles?

10. Jesus said, "I have cast fire upon the world, and look, I'm guarding it until it blazes."

53. His disciples said to him, "Is circumcision useful or not?"

He said to them, "If it were useful, their father would produce children already circumcised from their mother. Rather, the true circumcision in spirit has become profitable in every respect."

Now what is a “true circumcision in spirit,” do you suppose?

84. Jesus said, "When you see your likeness, you are happy. But when you see your images that came into being before you and that neither die nor become visible, how much you will have to bear!"

Is this esoteric or just meaningless?


Some sayings are just downright bonkers, although the indoctrinated will likely claim they are deep puzzles which can only be solved by the enlightened as they’re intended to be secret wisdom.

11. Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away.

Who knew there was more than one heaven? And how many do you suppose there are?

12. The disciples said to Jesus, "We know that you are going to leave us. Who will be our leader?"

Jesus said to them, "No matter where you are you are to go to James the Just, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being."

And all this time I thought god created earth because he was lonely. But, if it’s all about James, then why is he such a minor figure in the Bible?

Why would a real god want us to just guess which deity is the real one, given that at least 90 billion of us down through the ages have worshipped false gods14. Jesus said to them, "If you fast, you will bring sin upon yourselves, and if you pray, you will be condemned, and if you give to charity, you will harm your spirits.

22. Jesus saw some babies nursing. He said to his disciples, "These nursing babies are like those who enter the (Father's) kingdom."

They said to him, "Then shall we enter the (Father's) kingdom as babies?"

Jesus said to them, "When you make the two into one, and when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner, and the upper like the lower, and when you make male and female into a single one, so that the male will not be male nor the female be female, when you make eyes in place of an eye, a hand in place of a hand, a foot in place of a foot, an image in place of an image, then you will enter [the kingdom]."

Now that sounds really hard to do. Do you suppose it takes a lot of practice?

30. Jesus said, "Where there are three deities, they are divine. Where there are two or one, I am with that one."

37. His disciples said, "When will you appear to us, and when will we see you?"

Jesus said, "When you strip without being ashamed, and you take your clothes and put them under your feet like little children and trample them, then [you] will see the son of the living one and you will not be afraid."

105. Jesus said, "Whoever knows the father and the mother will be called the child of a whore."

[Some experts think this last saying, below, was probably added to the original collection at a later date. Doesn’t it sound like something that misogynist-in-chief Paul would come up with?]

114. Simon Peter said to them, "Make Mary leave us, for females don't deserve life."
Jesus said, "Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of Heaven."

Now that is offensive on so many levels that to label it merely “bonkers” is probably being too kind.

So, does the Gospel of Thomas represent profound esoteric secrets of Christianity, or is it merely the ramblings of one or more confused or dishonest preachers? In the end, I don’t think it matters since it lacks the most basic markers we should expect from the message of a true deity; clarity and evidence. Why would a real god want us to just guess which deity is the real one, given that at least 90 billion of us down through the ages have worshipped false gods. It’s just way, way too easy to end up worshiping a false god, and surely a real god would know this and take steps to help us avoid it.

Christians tell us that god is everywhere, but then why is he so damned hard to find? They also tell us that god only reveals himself to those who seek him. However, I’ve seen over and over how people have “seeked” so hard they have convinced themselves they have found. But what have they found? It’s obvious that we humans have sought and “found” thousands of false gods down through the ages. So why seek? If a god truly wants me to believe, he surely can accomplish that with no help from me. That “leap of faith” that Christians regard so highly is really nothing but a guess made in the face of insufficient evidence.

Ultimately, a god and his message should make sense, and there is so much religious bullshit out there that no message purporting to come from a deity should be accepted as authentic if it lacks those basic markers of clarity and evidence.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not