Skip to main content

Positively Nontheistic, Altruistic, and Precocious

By Carl S. ~

Let me share some recently acquired important information, with a personal spin on it. There are two very different ways of explaining reality: the rational and the spiritual, interpreted as arriving on the one hand, from the ancient Greeks, and on the other, from pagan mystery cults. Seems that the Greeks, after establishing democracy by which they could determine their government and representatives, left the work to their slaves and had plenty of leisure which they used for philosophizing, reasoning, and observing the nature of things. Meanwhile, other pagans succumbed to the allure of the occidental pagan religions appealing to the senses over the life of reason.

These religions were filled with myths, rituals, pomp and ceremony. They also involved initiation rites into the “mysteries,” enabling the initiate to become as one with mystical forces and the sharing in the eternal life of the gods. This was accomplished through the use of potent plants and/or extreme stress on the mind and body of the individual (Such ceremonial stress is obvious even today, in the rites of some Native American tribes using sweat lodges and mind-altering drugs, and amongst primitive tribes. Some methods never change.)

Of the two interpretations of reality, the pagan one triumphed, and was assimilated into and adopted by Christianity and Islam. This interpretation involved rites such as baptism, in the flesh or spirit, the holy meal, the doctrine of “dualism,” the struggle between good and evil supernatural forces for control over this world, salvation from death and achieving a unity with a god or god-man through sharing in eternal life by believing in them, and participating in the trials and sufferings, death and resurrection of the god. Every one of these beliefs and traditions originated with pagan mystery religions. They are appeals to the sense of wonder, mystery, and fear of death. (For what are the real mysteries, after all, but birth and death?) They all offer “explanations” and methods for dealing with them.

When the mysteries, pomp, ceremony, and rituals associated combined with the military and ruling might of the government under Christianity, their acceptance was required. And thus it went, as every king or other ruler who was “converted” required his whole court and kingdom to follow suit. All of these happenings had, unlike the Greek approach to reality, nothing to do with actually knowing reality; in fact, the mysteries demanded they be the only reality. And because they wielded the power over lives, property, and the indoctrination of the uneducated, they reigned. For human rights and the life of reason, they substituted submission to the deity via his earthly representatives, as traditionally practiced by the Persian and Egyptian gods - representatives of paganism.

The feudal system was created by Christianity. Religious slavish systems of mind alone, with the doctrine of resignation to misery, suffering and death as one‘s lot as a sinner, while promising eternal bliss as the reward for submitting to it, persists even to this day.

Christianity triumphed by political power. In the words of historian Marc-Aurèle Renan: “If Christianity had been checked in it's growth by some deadly disease, the world would have become Mithraic.”

Nevertheless, despite the knowing-in- one's -heart sensual power of religion, the Greek tradition persisted. As the title of the book, “The Swerve” suggests, society was influenced once again by their traditions. The search for reality through investigation, not faith, yielded rich results, in spite of religious suppression and persecution. Reasonable men questioned, just as ancient Greek philosophers questioned. And eventually, democracy once again looked like a good idea. Knowledge acquired through methods initially begotten by those ancient thinkers is still being fought against whenever it conflicts with those still primitive mind-sets hell-bent on their ”mysteries” of access to the divine explanations of reality!

Some things we haven‘t given much attention to. The Enlightenment brought the conflict to the fore, where it has been ever since, combining the best of the traditions of reasoning, scientific investigation, education, and the means of mass communication via the printing press. And it has been this way ever since then.

Are we not back to the beginning, where the conflict first started? Very interestingly, we have education which the pagans, serfs, peasants, and slaves were denied, as a result of the domination of the religious interpretations of reality on Earth and in the Universe. Although we do not have slaves who did the labor enabling those Greeks the leisure to philosophize and seek out the truth of reality, we have substituted machines to do that labor for us, with their benefits. So let's get busy and not waste time. We have access to ancient and present wisdom, here and now, available in most of the world, for the first time in history. We have scientific training, the proofs of evolution obtained through the scientific method, and mass communication. We are needed to fill that which is missing.

What is missing in societies is the willingness to face the facts so readily available, and to renounce those ignorant pagan beliefs that have been and are still etched in the garb of moral necessity, tradition, and pseudo-intellectualism. There is still the too prevalent dead-end thinking of religious belief that feels good to so many who are willing to remain ignorant in spite of the reality all around them (think about it). Ignoring begets ignorance.

Somehow, I suspect things are already changing in one important belief supporting the Christian religion: eternal life. The pagan religions, of which Christianity is the offspring, emphasized not only belief in, but identification with, the god as a prerequisite for personal immortality. Christianity went one step further. Because an after death paradise was added to immortality, the religion also, in order to control by fear, added a hell which is also eternal in which to send, you’ve got it - the eternal soul. With paint brush in hand, the religion went blindly painting itself into a corner. As more and more theologians and clergy back away from preaching hell because the subject is a turn-off (and public sensitivity towards torture and the death penalty increases), the hell concept will not be spoken of. Which leaves? A soul which is immortal divorced from belief systems; a belief that immortality is a given, so it doesn’t matter what one believes. Meanwhile, we, like those ancient Greeks, can live fully with our mortal souls.

A father told my wife about her god-nephew changing TV channels. The father asked the boy what was going on. The boy said, “Dad, I have only so many minutes I’m allowed to watch, and I'm not going to waste them watching commercials.” You have only one life. Why, oh why, waste any minute of it praising or living for St. Paul's version of the god Mithras, for Paul's personal delusion of an imaginary redeemer of humanity?

So why, you might ask me, since you feel life is too important to be wasted on religion, why do you spend so many hours writing anti-religious rants? My reply is that you see my motives as negative, but I see them as positive. My own, and the testimonies of others, are actually emancipation proclamations.

Sources: The Swerve: How the World Became Modern by Stephen Greenblatt, and The Oriental Religions in Roman: Paganism (Classic Reprint) by Franz Cumont.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two