Skip to main content

The Practice

By Carl S. ~

An actor is chosen to portray Abraham Lincoln. Because he is fascinated by the personality of Lincoln, he willingly throws himself into this opportunity. Not only does he study his lines, he reads up on the man; anything he can learn of his character, personal feelings, outlook, mannerisms, speech, and thoughts. Later the actor gets so involved that, in order to be most convincing, he must become the person. He tries to understand how that man thought, to imagine what he felt, to see things through his eyes. The actor tries to put himself in place of the character in order to understand him so much that the portrayer and the portrayed become one. Lincoln is speaking and acting through him.

And so some actors describe this experience; living the part to the extent that, even when they leave the stage or set, they go home as the character. And the character may even be fictional, where even more imagination is required to make him “real” than an actual person. Some authors have mentioned that their own created characters take on a life of their own, “telling” them what they do, say, think.

Actors can be so convincing in their roles that they are identified by them. The public perceives them as the character they portray so convincingly, likable or otherwise. Some actors/roles are so fused that members of the public who identify with them are emotionally involved in mirroring their own psyches, feelings. (For example, after the announcement of the suicide of Marilyn Monroe, some women who identified with her also committed suicide.) Celebrity magazines bring a steady stream of news about every single decision and trivial item they can find regarding these actors who achieved stardom through convincingly portraying even fictional characters; often convincingly enough to guarantee them a cult following even after they die.

You can do the practice yourself. Pick a famous person, preferably someone you admire, someone you can get enthused about. Imagine yourself in that person's position. Read everything you can about that person, and go deeper into the words, emotions, outlooks, hopes and dreams of that person, real or fictional. Imagine yourself as that individual. Imagine making him or her part of your life. Imagine how wonderful it is to know someone better than the majority of the populace - personally, even. It’s a great feeling. Many people practicing this do come to know that person, even hear the person's voice talking to them personally. Consider that your relationship is unique because there is only one like you in this one-on-one relationship. You will feel the presence if you make the effort, the total commitment. You have cared with intensity, invested to the point that your former life seems meaningless by comparison. Your life will never be the same again. And you wonder why you didn't commit before.

This “practice” is actually used by Christian churches in order to impel their adherents, through intense study and prayer, to a personal relationship with God. (In the monasteries, it is called “contemplation.”) This is how, with the support of church community and it's “explanations,” one comes to accept “spiritual knowledge “ attainable no other way. It is the “Imitation of Christ,” (by Thomas à Kempis, circa 1420) with its methodology of identifying with the mind and emotions of God, in total surrender to his will. As a member of His family, the more you practice, the more will you be loved. This is the way to conviction in faith.

There are millions of believers practicing and praying. They are telling each other that they have access to the spiritual beyond reality, that God speaks to and through them, and will guide, protect, and love them and everyone else who believes and who keeps practicing. They know this because they ”know” firsthand what it is to have a personal relationship with the deity.

There’s something disturbing to me about this. The same practice which enables the portrayer to become the fictional, deceased or actual portrayed, almost to the point where he dwells in the portrayed’s mind, is at work. The believer creates or willingly accepts a personality he identifies with as one with himself, and therefore becomes intensely, intellectually, emotionally involved with that invisible personality to the extent that real people become secondary.

Consider that through such practice, one can attain an identification, a personal relationship, with the Mormon God, the Virgin Mary, Osiris, Ra, Apollo, Venus, etc. The practice will bring one to “understand” and “have a “personal relationship” with any gods or goddesses and their minds, their ways. You can easily understand that believers in those gods, who likewise practiced, also “knew in their hearts” that their god, with “evidence,” intervened in their lives. (Because, after all, why else were they worshiped throughout history?) The Christian god is only one of them. And every one of those gods is as invisible, unknowable, and indecipherable as the Christian god.

In actuality, the practice(s) used in Christianity frequently require self-sacrifice, self-denial, sensual deprivation, and the necessity of suffering as virtuous conditions. All of these things have been practiced for thousands of years; s.o.p. for believers, for the benefit of the gods and their spokesmen. The practice, etc., was common in Communist China under Mao Tse-tung, to create converts to the Party.

The ”practice” is understandable. It is a system of continually lying to oneself and rationalizing because one doesn't trust one's own self, which becomes, with practice, belief in lies and rationalizations as actually true and more “real” than everyday reality. Practitioners practice to believe in the fantasies in their own and other believers’ heads as the true reality. This is a method which takes advantage of human nature. There is nothing ”spiritual-world “ about it. While some may call it psychological manipulation, I see it as imaginative self-deception for the gullible and vulnerable. For these reasons alone, I see the practice as a humanly infused mental illness.


Popular posts from this blog


By David Andrew Dugle ~ O ctober. Halloween. It's time to visit the haunted house I used to live in. When I was five my dad was able to build a big modern house. Moving in before it was complete, my younger brother and I were sleeping in a large unfinished area directly under the living room. It should have been too new to be a haunted house, but now and then I would wake up in the tiny, dark hours and see the blurry image of a face, or at least what I took to be a face, glowing, faintly yellow, high up on the wall near the ceiling. I'm not kidding! Most nights it didn’t appear at all. But when it did show itself, at first I thought it was a ghost and it scared me like nothing else I’d ever seen. But the face never did anything; unmoving, it just stayed in that one spot. Turning on the lights would make it disappear, making my fears difficult to explain, so I never told anyone. My Sunday School teachers had always told me to be good because God was just behind m

The Blame Game or Shit Happens

By Webmdave ~ A relative suffering from Type 1 diabetes was recently hospitalized for an emergency amputation. The physicians hoped to halt the spread of septic gangrene seeping from an incurable foot wound. Naturally, family and friends were very concerned. His wife was especially concerned. She bemoaned, “I just don’t want this (the advanced sepsis and the resultant amputation) to be my fault.” It may be that this couple didn’t fully comprehend the seriousness of the situation. It may be that their choice of treatment was less than ideal. Perhaps their home diabetes maintenance was inconsistent. Some Christians I know might say the culprit was a lack of spiritual faith. Others would credit it all to God’s mysterious will. Surely there is someone or something to blame. Someone to whom to ascribe credit. Isn’t there? A few days after the operation, I was talking to a man who had family members who had suffered similar diabetic experiences. Some of those also suffered ea

Reasons for my disbelief

By Rebekah ~ T here are many layers to the reasons for my disbelief, most of which I haven't even touched on here... When I think of Evangelical Christianity, two concepts come to mind: intense psychological traps, and the danger of glossing over and missing a true appreciation for the one life we know that we have. I am actually agnostic when it comes to a being who set creation in motion and remains separated from us in a different realm. If there is a deistic God, then he/she doesn't particularly care if I believe in them, so I won't force belief and instead I will focus on this one life that I know I have, with the people I can see and feel. But I do have a lot of experience with the ideas of God put forth by Evangelical Christianity, and am confident it isn't true. If it's the case god has indeed created both a physical and a heavenly spiritual realm, then why did God even need to create a physical realm? If the point of its existence is to evolve to pas

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two