Skip to main content

When Is It Too Late For Someone?

By Hoopy Frood ~

At what point should we give up on someone? I am speaking primarily about Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church. They are the most hateful, intolerant, fear mongering people you will ever meet, but should we give up on them? By give up on them I mean give up reasoning with them to try to show them that what they are doing is wrong and extremely harmful. I fully support reasoning with someone to try to come to a peaceful and reasonable solution, but where do you draw the line? When is someone beyond helpable?

WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka7
WBC 20051202 sacco-topeka7 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I believe that this may be the case for the WBC but I really hate just giving up on anyone. I am willing to listen to and consider anyone else’s POV as long as they are willing to sit down and have a civil conversation and listen to mine as well. But after you watch and listen to the WBC for a while you realize that most, if not all, members cannot be reasoned with. I am afraid these are the people that cannot be reached. Ironically, they say the same thing about America. It is too late for them to understand or embrace any kind of reason. The only way to cure the US of groups like theirs is to ignore them, but we love to hate sensationalist groups with controversial messages so they will continue to make the news. I don’t really even like writing about them because it gives them publicity which leads to power but this is something important that should be said.

I am willing to listen to and consider anyone else’s POV as long as they are willing to sit down and have a civil conversation and listen to mine as well. The WBC is a great example of why it is so hard to place faith in the Bible. Of course there are MANY varying interpretations, but the WBC’s interpretation seems very extreme. It seems so extreme that you would believe that there is absolutely no way that they can spin the Bible into what they say if for no other reason than most Christians believe that the Bible is a book of extreme love. But if you check on of their many websites you will find that everything that they preach and believe in is completely backed by scripture. Of course, if you actually read the Bible then you realize that the WBC is just like the God of the Old Testament. It’s too bad Fred didn’t live during those times. He would have been a perfect fit.

Fred Phelps himself may be evil, or he may be a victim of his upbringing or maybe just mentally deranged, but it’s hard for me to hate his children and their children because it’s not their fault that they were indoctrinated into this cult. Still, it’s hard to envision a situation where any of them wake up and see the harm that they are causing to the people of our country and the reputation of our country. The scariest part of this situation really is the children and grandchildren of Fred. The difference between Fred and his children is that Fred was not raised believing this. He had a religious experience in his late teen years and then came to the conclusion that his minister was not properly interpreting and preaching the Bible, so he formed these beliefs on his own without being indoctrinated. One could argue that reaching these conclusions on one’s own could lead to a greater belief in them than if you were raised to believe these thing, but I disagree. If you are raised with these beliefs then you really have no frame of reference for how others think. You completely lose the ability to be objective in any way. But if you begin believing this on your own, at least there was a point in your life that you can go back to where you saw things from another perspective. His children and their children are different because they were raised believing this and were indoctrinated from birth which could make them twice as dangerous and zealous as Fred himself. This is all they have ever known so they believe it to the core. The only difference between the WBC and Muslim extremists is that Muslim extremists will actually kill you whereas the WBC will only picket or sue you. This is the case so far, but I would not be surprised if, in the future, the WBC tried something violent. Still, the precedent set by Fred and the indoctrination of his children and their children is extremely dangerous, but luckily there are not many of them.

As terrible as they are, they are still a great teaching tool. They are the prime example of what free speech means and how powerful that right is for our citizens. I would venture a guess that 99.99% of Americans vehemently disagree with what they say, but because of the First Amendment, they are allowed to say it. This is what’s great and terrible about our country. Having the right of free speech means that you can say what you want but it does not mean that you ought to say it. With this right of free speech also comes the responsibility to know when to use it. Unfortunately, the WBC seems to have perfected the art of knowing exactly how to abuse this right.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro