Skip to main content

Out of Control

By Carl S. ~

There was a time when "mystical" was in vogue. Now, "spiritual" has taken flight in popularity, following the ascent of Zen, the Dalai Lama, and New-Age gospels. Outside of the multitudes of preachers everywhere, with their traditional biases, "spiritual" isn't necessarily "religious" anymore. It’s more personal, less social. That word now applies to vampires and zombies as well as angels, and perhaps to the souls of science fiction androids, in our own times. A phrase we are hearing quite a lot of is "surreal experience," usually spoken by those who experienced natural and man-made destruction.

Individuals who have abandoned or are indifferent to religions still claim to be "spiritual." Books and magazine articles by individuals claiming near-death, after-death, and out-of-body experiences spread like wildfire and are often accepted as true without question. Meanwhile, books of scientific evidence explaining those experiences are ignored. Though the logical methods of fact-finding are given credence in the courtrooms and CSI stories, when it comes to these "spiritual" accounts, scientific analysis and/or mere common sense are ignored. (Hasn't this always been so, with alternative realities the perennial fads?)

Notice that every one of those spiritual, mystical, and surreal descriptions describes the effects of things out of our control. If visions of angels, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, hallucinations, revelations, speaking in tongues, and sexual climaxes, were all under control, would there be religion? If not for the uncontrollable end of life and the fear they create of what might happen afterward dying, would clergy exist? (Why do clergy thank God, when it is Death they owe their livelihoods to?)

If it weren't for a belief in a god who is unpredictable, capricious, and almighty, there would be no need to appease him, praise him, or to sacrifice to him in order to ensure his graces and mercy. If God were incapable of becoming as out of control as humans can be, there would be no rituals required to keep him under control. Those who say, "God is in control," are flinging a cliché. And their god and his representatives are, by definition, control freaks.

These thoughts came after reading a movie review. This is what it says: "Inequality, injustice, and the demands of the world we live in cause stress and depression for many people. Some of them however, explode. This is a movie about them. The characters cross the line that divides civilization and barbarism. A lover's betrayal, a return to the depressed past and the violence woven into everyday encounters drive the characters to madness as they cede to the pleasure of losing control."

It was that last part, "as they cede to the pleasure of losing control," that hit me like a slap across the face. I am upset enough by accounts of ordinary people driven to madness as they cede themselves to the (shall we say insatiable?) pleasure of being out of control. And by those who cede moral self-control to serve the madness of others. We don't want to give their violence our validation or encouragement. For too many believers, "ceding" is not really madness, but a letting go, a letting God, by abandoning their selves to express their "spiritual" or bestial otherness.

Don't the pleasures of being out of control explain sexual spontaneity, the release of inhibitions by alcohol and drugs, the thrills of amusement park rides, sky diving? What about speaking in tongues, or of being a "holy roller," chanting alleluias with the congregations, abandoning self-control in order to be controlled by the crowds and their leaders? (Oh, for that real true old time religion of Bacchanalian orgies!) Can't you see the spiritual substance abuse of religion, where the first hit is free?

They regard their faith as being more important than human livesConsider ISIS, suicide bombers, and cult members now passionately plunging headlong, "crossing the line between civilization and barbarism." (It is not just the radical believers who are using their sincerely held beliefs to override rationality and human kindness for their god: I have yet to find a moderate reader among the believers who'll contradict my claim that they regard their faith as being more important than human lives.)

Every example of "spiritual, mystical, surreal," means, really, anything that overwhelms our senses. There is nothing else involved or explicable outside of the physical, material, brain and body. In fact, everyone who wants access to the out-of-body and near-death experiences ought to sign up with the researchers who will stimulate, with electricity, those paths in the brain which cause them to happen. The results of those stimulations? "Out-of-body experiences, heavenly music, vivid hallucinations, and the kind of panoramic memories associated with the life review part of the near-death experience." (Discover magazine, back in July of 2005!) And not to be downplayed: the feeling of oneness with nature and benevolence towards humanity ever after.

But, what about that other use of the word spiritual, as experience, being overused these days? I listen to the birds outside singing their hearts out, watch the chipmunk running around, I read about a bear sitting and watching the sun set, and see old monkeys apparently lost in thought, looking into the distance. Don't they also have the spiritual experiences people talk about? Isn't the sense of wonder enough, without supernatural baggage? Hell, when was the last time you really, truly, tasted the coffee in your cup, or truly watched and listened to the world around you without interruptions? Where is the close observation of a Darwin in your life, of appreciation for the forms ever evolving and most wondrous?

It's about time to scrap the supernatural, mystical, surreal, etc. craptalk and be honest. And let us never cede our self-control lightly.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro