Skip to main content

Halloween Night and Happy Anniversary to Me

By Carl S ~

It was on Halloween night 60 years ago that I was evicted from the Trappist monastery. It was just before Compline, the last church service of the day. Everyone filed into the church. I was held back and taken to a room where the clothes were laid out for a change back into being a member of society again. When this was done, two mail carriers, who were there for a retreat, drove me with them, dropping me off at my parent's house. (The Catholic Church didn't have to pay for my bus ticket home.)

On the way, we stopped at an all-night diner, where the jukebox was playing Bill Haley's “Shake, Rattle, and Roll” with the lyrics including “your soul.” This felt strange. Here was a case of listening to the word “soul” in quite a new context from where I just came from. One of the men ordered a hamburger for me. (I was so wasted as a result of monastic brain-washing that I couldn't even make simple decisions for myself anymore.) You might wonder what it's like to eat meat after being a vegan for years. It wasn't a pleasant experience. They did all the talking during the trip. I was still pretty much the non-talking monk I was trained to be. I remained so for several weeks. That night, I slept on the floor, my senses still numbed. You could have stabbed me, and I would barely have felt it. I was as devastated as a rejected lover. What began as a “love affair with Jesus” ended as a crushing and disillusioned yet ultimately very liberating divorce.

The monastery and I couldn't have made a better divorce. Things might have ended differently. While I was a member, I saw another monk being, by all appearances, psychologically treated outside, and he was practically absent any personality. What happened to him? Was it a result of practicing the same way of life as I was committed to? In retrospect, it looks that way.

Years later, I started to think about something else related to this. Shortly after I became a member, on one night (also after Compline), the corpse of a young monk on a bier was carried past all of us, and was buried behind the church. Why would a body be buried at night, if not as a result of a suicide? Wasn't this pursuit to conform to “the will of God,” self-destructive, rather than “spiritual” - whatever that word meant in that fabricated environment?

My experiences in being brought up Catholic led me to understand that life is too important to be wasted on religion.I saw Fr. Louis, a.k.a. the celebrated author Thomas Merton, but didn't have the opportunity to talk to him. (I was a brother, and the priests were a privileged class. We didn't have contact with them). Fr. Louis died while on his own retreat, probably in India. He came out from showering and stepped on a bare electric wire. A “holy man of God” met the same fate as a convicted killer in the electric chair!

Then there was my early experience of a “religious ecstasy.” It was an out-of-body, uplifting in peace and joy, in a communion with Jesus/God. I felt privileged and blessed at the time to have such an experience. Eighteen years later, I experienced the very same feelings, but this time during sexual intercourse! (Do not tell my wife; this was before her.) Needless to say, my first wife was indifferent and did not share this ecstasy. In fact, it left her cold. So much for “God's” mutual experience with me that first time it happened. In both encounters, neurons in the human brain explain it all. (We will get to this subject later.) Meanwhile, some thoughts:

Wow! Sixty years later. I've been an atheist for many decades now, though not until recent years an avowed one. All religions are anathema to my conscience and ridiculous to reason. My experiences in being brought up Catholic led me to understand that life is too important to be wasted on religion.

Religious doctrines are bizarre and cry out for ridicule. The danger in religion is that it is a practice of taking ridiculous assertions seriously and unthinkingly, while ignoring realities which are very serious. Hence, I give in to temptations to ridicule them as often as the opportunities arise. Example: “Amelia, how can you be so sure you know who the true father of Jesus is?” Answer: “Why, I stood outside Mary’s bedroom window, and she kept crying out, ‘Oh god! Oh god! Oh god, oh, ... oh!!!’”

Now, about that “religious ecstasy” issue: You must access the book “Phantoms in the Brain,” by Ramachandran, M.D., and read chapter 9, “God and the Limbic System.” Halfway through the chapter, I realized...Eureka! There is the evidence for “spiritual “experiences - they are in temporal lobe seizures and the “temporal lobe personality.” Occam's razor. Astonishingly, Dr. Ramachandran is incapable of seeing the obvious in these examples. He interprets the results backwards, as coming from a non-material source! There's nothing like supernatural explanations for spiritual experiences as a circular, going nowhere substitute for evidence. Notice that the invisible and the nonexistent are very much alike here. (As one writer said, “God is not dead - he lives in your head.”)

After all these years of hearing people speaking out about and reading of their personal religious experiences - who tell us how wonderful it is to “communicate with something greater than ourselves,” and “understanding what it all means,” - you see that it's all about feelings. And these result from the human brain’s misfirings, often bringing with them mind-altering emotional responses.

In light of this understanding, shouldn't we be asking Christian believers a question? Your religion is founded on St. Paul's one-time emotional “road to Damascus” moment. This was, based on established facts, most likely the result of a temporal lobe seizure with a vision and a voice. Is this an unshakable reason to worship his experience and interpretation of this vision? Really?

I'm sending a “Thank You” card to the monastery, in appreciation for their dumping me out into the real world. I would like to tell them that they're communally delusional, but that would be a waste of time, wouldn't it? Not my problem.

Happy, happy anniversary to me.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not