Skip to main content


By Carl S ~

There are different types of confession. There is confessing to wrongdoing, confessing as used in praising, and the romantic one expressed in the song title, “I‘m confessin' that I love you.”

An old adage: Confession is good for the soul. Supposedly, ordinary people do feel better, even relieved, after “fessing up” to a misdemeanor. Another kind of confession was one common in my primary family, where each member was encouraged, in the words of my dad, to join him and to “get it (your grievance) off your chest.” This didn't resolve anything, because he was always drunk at the time he said it. But, such confessions did have the result of venting pent-up resentments. Nevertheless, both in one-on-one interactions and societies, confession is usually accepted as a good idea. This is deceiving. Let's look at confession as a loss of power and a tool to control through power.

Police officers interrogate suspects in order to obtain confessions. Sometimes their pressure methods are so successful that innocent people have confessed to crimes they didn't commit. Police- obtained confessions are used in courtrooms as assumed proof of guilt, even accepted by juries as such. Catholic priests confess only to other priests. (In the secular world, pedophilia is a crime, ergo, priests hearing and withholding confessions to pedophilia are “partners in crime.”)

A practice of the former Soviet Union under Stalin, and Communist China under Mao, was to obtain public confessions through private tortures and/or, public humiliations, which was very successful. After all, this system had a strong foundation; it worked for the Inquisition interrogators and witch-hunters. Whether by traditional religions or state religions, confessions are used for control, for power. Cults of all kinds depend on confessions as mandatory.

Confessions are used as control power over others by creating SHAME for one's ordinary human actions and feelings. They make shameful to oneself and others, feelings and actions which those powers do not approve of. They are ruling that you should be ashamed if you do not meet up with the expectations of whoever they claim to represent, i. e., themselves. Religious “authorities” assume that they have the right and duty to enforce shame on others, in any way they can get away with it. Haven’t you noticed this?

In common with secular powers creating shame where there is none in order to force confessions, religions re-create the man-mad structures for them; their own interrogation rooms, hermetically sealed from the outside world, whether in a church, mosque, confessional, cult group, etc. Within every one of these confines, with their emotionally controlled atmospheres, power is guaranteed. “Confessing to” and “confessing of,” are strongly encouraged. No one has the right to demand this of you, nor to expect you to openly allow yourself to be emotionally blackmailed.

If you are a sensitive, trusting individual, you ought to find yourself emotionally drained by the experience of “confessing your shameful faults,” whether you feel relieved or not. In doing so, you become even more dependent on the cleric, the cult leader, the congregation, for emotional, “spiritual,” support.What do these examples mean to us personally, in our experiences? Well, for those raised n the Catholic Church, confession is a private matter between confessor and priest. So, it’s possible that, if you are Catholic, your pastor knows more about you than your spouse, family, or friends. In revealing your secrets, you are relinquishing power over your private life to someone you don't really know. For those raised in other religions, public revelations can take the formula of, “I confess my sins, humbling myself before god, pleading for his mercy and the forgiveness of all who I have offended.” You have made yourself vulnerable. This amounts to, in the words of an old wise man, “Giving a man a stick to beat you with.” (Or a whole congregation!)

If you are a sensitive, trusting individual, you ought to find yourself emotionally drained by the experience of “confessing your shameful faults,” whether you feel relieved or not. In doing so, you become even more dependent on the cleric, the cult leader, the congregation, for emotional, “spiritual,” support. Consider on the other hand that you, and others like you, receive attention you would not get from other sources, in any other settings. You are embraced because of your neediness; you are “special” by being “saved.” Saved by who, salvaged from yourself, for what purposes of others? In “turning your life over to the lord,” don't you actually relinquish control over your moral decisions to others? Is it worth that much to you?

Finally, other examples of popular confessions: Celebrities and politicians confessing infidelities, illegal drug use, performance drug overuse, etc. (After being found out, of course.) In a sense, there is connection here between them and those who stand up in congregations to proclaim their sins; along with such “humbling” there is a kind of bragging in the confessor who was bold enough to do the things we wouldn't.

If there are those who confess under certain circumstances to crimes they didn't commit, do not others, under similar circumstances, confess to BELIEVING what they don't?

If you feel the need to confess, do so with a wife or friend or shrink; someone who you can trust, who you have confidence in, who won’t betray you. Stay away from clergy; don't trust them. (During the inquisition, clergy demanded that the faithful betray their friends. The methods used to achieve the will of god know no limits.) How many women and children alone can attest to being molested or propositioned by clergy? Enough to equal the population of New York State?

So, if “confession is good for the soul,” for whose good is it? Your experiences appreciated.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro