Skip to main content

Lessons in Discordianism

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

Eris (Ancient Greek: Ἔρις, "Strife")
is the Greek goddess of chaos, strife and discord,
her name being translated into Latin as Discordia
A recent posting on this site mentioned the parody religion called Discordianism. In tracking down the link provided, I found a whole barrelful of laughs. But I also began to discover something more serious.

Reading about Discordianism quickly brought to mind Poe’s Law. For those who haven’t heard of Poe’s Law, this is a snippet of what Wikipedia has to say about it:

“Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.”

That is, a parody of something extreme is impossible to differentiate from the thing itself.

But, religion (or most of them) is extremism by its very nature, since, to be taken seriously, it requires one to assume a supernatural realm for which there is no physical evidence, and that is clearly an extremist position. If I am correct in this, then there should be many parallels between a parody religion, which is extreme by intention, and a traditional religion like Christianity, which is extreme by its supernatural nature.

The following is a brief definition of Discordianism taken from Wikipedia.
“Discordianism is a religion and subsequent philosophy based on the veneration or worship of Eris (also known as Discordia), the Greco-Roman goddess of chaos, or archetypes or ideals associated with her.”

(Who knew that our own Discordia at was named after a goddess? I suppose we should have suspected this, given her eloquence and rapier wit.)
Discordianism “. . . was founded circa 1958–1959 after the publication of its (first) holy book, the Principia Discordia, written by two individuals working under the pseudonyms Malaclypse the Younger and Omar Khayyam Ravenhurst.”

The religion has been likened to Zen and Taoist philosophy in its appreciation of the paradox and the absurd; Discordianism is centered on the idea that both the apparent order and disorder of the universe are merely illusory.

The Pentabarf is the doctrine of Discordianism which contains the five most fundamental of all Discordian teachings. Rule number 5 is of particular interest:
“A Discordian is Prohibited from Believing What he reads.”

Notice the parallels of this statement with the absurdist facets of Zen ("If you meet the Buddha on your path, kill him."), and the Taoist religion ("the Tao that can be named is not the true Tao."). You see, if one is prohibited from believing what he reads, then he is also prohibited from believing that he shouldn’t believe what he reads, and the statement thereby recurses back on itself.

Now here’s where we begin to see the more serious parallels of Discordianism with Christianity. Notice that the fifth law - prohibiting one from believing what he reads – is also tacitly observed in Christianity where, despite Jesus’ claim that his followers will be able to do greater miracles than himself, no Christian actually believes this. Similarly, despite Jesus’ clear claim, in simple, direct language, that true believers’ prayers will always be granted, no Christian expects all his prayers to be granted.

It is also noteworthy that while the Bible commands death for homosexuals, adulterers, blasphemers, etc., and no Christian actually believes such edicts are moral, Christians nevertheless claim god and the Bible as sources of moral absolutes. Thus, like a paradox or koan, if a Biblical statement is obvious nonsense, rather than accept it as evidence of the author’s ignorance, or a simple falsehood, the good Christian refuses to believe what he reads and simply ignores it. If cornered, most Christians will “explain” this by claiming we should not expect to understand the infinitely superior mind of god. Thus, if a Biblical statement is obviously false, absurd, or immoral, then it cannot mean what it says and the Christian is effectively prohibited from believing what he has read.

God is proclaimed as ultimately and inviolably “good,” despite his having created evil, and his commission of numerous atrocities such as the genocide of many tribes and the Great Flood which destroyed nearly all humans.Another interesting teaching of Discordianism is the “Law of Fives,” as summarized in the Principia Discordia: The Law of Fives states that: “All things happen in fives, or are divisible by or are multiples of five, or are somehow directly or indirectly appropriate to 5.” Lord Omar is quoted later on the same page as having written, "I find the Law of Fives to be more and more manifest the harder I look." The key to understanding this principle is “the harder I look” phrase.

As one commentary on Discordianism stated,
“… the real Law of Fives is realizing that everything can be related to the number five, if you try hard enough.”

Sometimes, of course, the steps required may be highly convoluted.

With regard to Christianity, Lord Omar’s pronouncement on the Law of Fives might be re-stated as,
"I find the ultimate goodness of god to be more and more manifest the harder I look."

This dogma is routinely verified by Christian clergy and apologists, although the “reasoning” is, of necessity, highly convoluted. For example, in Christian dogma, god is proclaimed as ultimately and inviolably “good,” despite his having created evil, and his commission of numerous atrocities such as the genocide of many tribes and the Great Flood which destroyed nearly all humans.

Another way of looking at the Law of Fives is as a symbol for the observation of reality changing (in the observer's mind) that which is being observed. At its most basic level, the Law of Fives states that perception is intent-sensitive; that is, the perceiver's intentions influence the perception.

Thus, the Christian who INTENDS to see Christ as a great philosopher achieves his purpose despite the obvious stupidity of much of what Jesus said, such as make no provision for tomorrow, cut off your balls if you can handle it, the world will end soon, etc.

Also, Christians regularly claim to feel a deep, personal connection with their god and/or Jesus. This too, is a case of the perceiver's intentions influencing the perception. If one expects long enough and hard enough to feel the presence of god, it becomes virtually certain that he will do so. Paradoxically, while Christians insist on the one hand that god is everywhere and infuses reality thoroughly, on the other hand they are equally certain that god only manifests his being to those who genuinely search for him. In a Christian, Zen-like, Discordianist-like claim then, while god is everywhere, he is still very hard to find; in fact, despite the fact that he is everywhere, you have to intend to find him. (Which brings to mind the Zen-like observation of the Discordia of, that it seems god can do anything . . . except prove he exists.)

Okay, perhaps I have not exactly proven my hypothesis that serious religions are extreme in their basic nature, and are therefor essentially indistinguishable from parody religions. Nevertheless, I am confident that I have made a compelling case for further study.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not