Skip to main content

When Jesus gives you bacon, but also sends you to hell

By Pedro Fortunato ~

Yesterday on Facebook, I saw a picture that ironizes the judgmental logic so present in many Christians. There was the phrase "How to get a ticket to hell" and then, those well-known not so popular commandments from the Old Testament prohibiting eating pork, working on Saturdays, etc. Well, I know it was meant to be just a joke, but anyone who knows a little theology, knows there is a theological error in this picture (the error of thinking that the laws of the Old Testament were meant to save people from hell). Anyone with a little more understanding of the Jewish culture knows that the idea of hell and heaven are not in the Old Testament as the Jewish religion did not, and does not, have a hell (the idea was developed when the Old Testament was already written and only “stuck” on Christianity).

It does not take much study to comprehend that breaking the law in the Old testament did not mean eternal, but temporal punishment, as it is summed up in the book of Deuteronomy 30:19 “This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live”. Only a very poor theology would take it out of context and teach that life and death here are synonymous of heaven and hell.

But this misunderstanding of interpretation, this mix of the Old Testament laws with the Christian hell as consequence of breaking them, made me think about which one of the “testaments” is actually better. The Old Testament, with the god that sends plagues to kill entire civilizations or the New Testament, with its god who loved the whole world so much that he will send that same world to hell for not loving him back.

It is not uncommon to hear people claiming that the Old Testament is too severe and complicated and the New Testament is all about god’s love. We hear people saying that the old covenant was of the law, but now is the time of god's grace. It seems that while the god of the Old Testament was always looking for someone to punish, the god of the New Testament just wants to save humanity, giving his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16). This passage is well known, however, after John 3:16, there is John 3:18, saying that whoever does not believe in the son is already condemned. Thus, if in the old version, god used his Law to establish a temporal condemnation for his chosen people, in the updated version, he uses his loving son not only for salvation, but also, for eternal condemnation of anyone in the world. Weird, right?

Back to Facebook. A friend of mine commented on the aforementioned picture. She wrote "thanks god for the New Testament". I understand her commentary as it is something I would have written myself in the past, when I was still a Christian. She believes that the New Testament "puts an end" to the inconvenient laws of the Old Testament and brings the gospel of salvation, enabling us to go to heaven while eating a cheeseburger with double bacon (maybe after working on a Saturday, wearing a tight cotton-polyester t-shirt that does not cover a cool tattoo of Jesus Christ). What she may not realize is that the New Testament is precisely what brings the possibilities of both eternal salvation and eternal damnation to humanity. The Old Testament was about the earthly life of a single people (Israel), but the New Testament deals with the afterlife of every single person who ever lived. Like that bad Suicide Squad movie with Jared Leto and Will Smith, the New Testament comes to solve a problem created by itself. Without the New Testament, there is no Jesus to save us from hell, but also, there is no hell to be saved from.

In the Old Testament, when Israel disobeyed the law of god, they would lose god’s favor and be conquered by the latest emerging, cruel, nearby empire. And any Jew would be impure before god for just a bite of pork meat. But it is only in the New Testament that we find the threat of spending eternity in weeping and gnashing of teeth. Think about that the next time you complain about the price to add extra bacon on your sandwich.

By here, you might think I am saying that things were way better in the Old Testament, when someone could be stoned to death just for stubbornly disobeying their parents (Deuteronomy 21:18-21). Well, I am not saying that. I am not saying the Old Testament is overly better than the New one. I do not believe that, and I know I am oversimplifying a discussion that could easily result in a much larger text. But, with these few issues considered here, the question remains: which one is better? The severe god, who may send you the ten plagues or the loving god, who might send you to hell?

Well, it is eternal suffering, but if you ask me, I’d rather have my cheeseburger with extra bacon, please.


Popular posts from this blog


By David Andrew Dugle ~ O ctober. Halloween. It's time to visit the haunted house I used to live in. When I was five my dad was able to build a big modern house. Moving in before it was complete, my younger brother and I were sleeping in a large unfinished area directly under the living room. It should have been too new to be a haunted house, but now and then I would wake up in the tiny, dark hours and see the blurry image of a face, or at least what I took to be a face, glowing, faintly yellow, high up on the wall near the ceiling. I'm not kidding! Most nights it didn’t appear at all. But when it did show itself, at first I thought it was a ghost and it scared me like nothing else I’d ever seen. But the face never did anything; unmoving, it just stayed in that one spot. Turning on the lights would make it disappear, making my fears difficult to explain, so I never told anyone. My Sunday School teachers had always told me to be good because God was just behind m

The Blame Game or Shit Happens

By Webmdave ~ A relative suffering from Type 1 diabetes was recently hospitalized for an emergency amputation. The physicians hoped to halt the spread of septic gangrene seeping from an incurable foot wound. Naturally, family and friends were very concerned. His wife was especially concerned. She bemoaned, “I just don’t want this (the advanced sepsis and the resultant amputation) to be my fault.” It may be that this couple didn’t fully comprehend the seriousness of the situation. It may be that their choice of treatment was less than ideal. Perhaps their home diabetes maintenance was inconsistent. Some Christians I know might say the culprit was a lack of spiritual faith. Others would credit it all to God’s mysterious will. Surely there is someone or something to blame. Someone to whom to ascribe credit. Isn’t there? A few days after the operation, I was talking to a man who had family members who had suffered similar diabetic experiences. Some of those also suffered ea

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Reasons for my disbelief

By Rebekah ~ T here are many layers to the reasons for my disbelief, most of which I haven't even touched on here... When I think of Evangelical Christianity, two concepts come to mind: intense psychological traps, and the danger of glossing over and missing a true appreciation for the one life we know that we have. I am actually agnostic when it comes to a being who set creation in motion and remains separated from us in a different realm. If there is a deistic God, then he/she doesn't particularly care if I believe in them, so I won't force belief and instead I will focus on this one life that I know I have, with the people I can see and feel. But I do have a lot of experience with the ideas of God put forth by Evangelical Christianity, and am confident it isn't true. If it's the case god has indeed created both a physical and a heavenly spiritual realm, then why did God even need to create a physical realm? If the point of its existence is to evolve to pas