Skip to main content

The Mosquito: Intelligent Design?

by WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

Intelligent design fans like to point to humans, the banana, the giraffe, and other assorted life forms to show the brilliance of god’s wondrous, benign design talents. But, as usual, they never think quite deeply enough to see the flaws in their “theory.” With just a little more thought they would see that if god designed all the plants and animals, then he also designed a whole host of man’s mortal enemies like harmful bacteria, viruses, and many other decidedly un-benign creatures. And what does all this say about the character and intentions of god-the-designer?
A Mosquito feeding on blood
A Mosquito feeding on blood (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From this angle, God’s crowning design achievement has to be the mosquito, probably the most dangerous creature on earth to man. The mosquito, in fact, appears perfectly designed to inflict misery on man. Its eggs can hatch in just two days in a few ounces of water, and its tiny size and virtually inaudible buzz make it stealthy in the extreme. And mosquito eggs are extremely hardy; if not laid in standing water, they will remain unhatched for weeks or months until they are covered with water.

Most mosquitoes attack birds and mammals, though some feed on the blood of reptiles and amphibians. Only female mosquitoes bite, because a blood meal is usually required for egg laying.

Once it finds you, the mosquito lands, inserts its proboscis and probes for blood vessels. When it finds one, it injects saliva into the wound. The saliva contains an anticoagulant that ensures a steady, smooth flow of blood. However, and here’s the rub, the mosquito’s saliva may also contain pathogens such as malaria parasites or encephalitis virus. This is how mosquitoes transmit disease.

Mosquitoes, via the diseases they spread, have been responsible for killing more people than all the wars in history, and human defenses to this point have been woefully inadequate. In recent years mosquitoes have infected about 200 million people a year with malaria, killing 2 to 3 million.

Dengue is another serious disease spread by mosquitos. It infects 50 to 500 million people per year, leading to half a million hospitalizations, and approximately 25,000 deaths. More damning for the “designer” perhaps is the fact that the more serious form of dengue is more common in babies and young children. Tens of millions more people are killed or debilitated by other mosquito-borne diseases such as filariasis, yellow fever, and encephalitis.

So, according to intelligent design believers, god designed the mosquito to be a very small, super stealthy blood sucker. That it’s a carrier of numerous deadly diseases can’t really be an oversight, can it? We’re talking about god the “perfect” being here, the “perfect” designer, after all.

Now, design involves purpose, doesn’t it? Clearly, nobody designs anything without some purpose in mind. In fact, it’s the purpose which drives the design. So what does this tell us about god the designer? The mosquito certainly appears to have been designed to wreak havoc among humans and many other animals. The lowly though exquisitely “designed” mosquito spreads pain, misery, and very often death among many millions of humans every year.

If the intelligent design folks were science savvy, they would have discovered this nasty side of god-the-designer early on and shelved the whole idea. Most people with a hypothesis will continue to look for examples which confirm the hypothesis; say, the hypothesis of a loving god designer. But, the scientist knows that a whole boatload of confirming evidence can be blown out of the water by just one example of disconfirming evidence. And, again I ask, what does the mosquito say about the hypothesis of god’s love for man?

I challenge any intelligent design believer to explain to me why I shouldn’t deduce from the facts above that the mosquito’s designer is a malevolent being intent on sowing misery and death among humans. The alternative, of course, is evolution, and that seems to me the only way out of this predicament. So, is god a malevolent being who intends to sow misery and painful death among innocent, unsuspecting humans, or was Darwin right all along?


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not