Skip to main content

Afterlife With Pets

By Mriana ~

I want to run this by our readers- not just atheists, non-theists, Ex-Christians, humanists, Pagans, Wiccans, and whoever else our readership is that are not Christian, but also the Christians too- both who believe pets go heaven and those who do not. I do not think it matters if you believe pets do or do not go to heaven or even if you believe in an afterlife to follow my questions after I tell you this incident, which left me in a very sickened, disturbed, and shocked state of mind for several days. However, it is just one more example as to how heaven and hell are merely human concepts. I could not imagine how any sane and reasonable human would come up with such a concept.

Animals and the Afterlife: True Stories of Our Best Friends' Journey Beyond DeathThis scenario came up while my mother was telling me that my definition of hell was not hell because it is not eternal. A few days ago, I gave my definition of hell being on earth and created by humans, as well as made mention of that statement from her, in another essay.

At the time, this part of my conversation with my mother was so disturbing, sickening, and, dare I say, demented, that I could not even bare to talk about it. It put me in a frightened state of silence, because the woman could not hear what she was saying. I was not frightened about what she was saying, but of her. Any attempt to translate it in the manner I was hearing it, would have only encouraged her to continue with her disturbingly insane line of reasoning and placing blame on her god. I could not image any Christian, be they one who believes in eternal life for pets or not, saying such a thing. Using such a ploy on a person who loves animals and yet does not believe in the Christian hell is just plain upsetting and disturbing. If a person could come up with such an idea, what else could they do? However, I am willing to hear what others, both Christians and non-Christians, have to say about the situation that caused me to go into total shock and completely mute. Yes, I just invited Christians to comment on this one, but only after they have read and given some thought to what I have to say on the matter.

Here is the scenario:

Christian mother scared to death and is angry because she “won’t see her daughter in heaven” because she is a humanist. Knowing how her daughter feels about other animals, has said many times over, “It would not be heaven without our pets.” In response her daughter says, “We have that here, so why not enjoy them in the here and now?”

Well, as it turns out, in my mother’s view, it would seem our pets ride on the coattails of our faith [in God/Jesus]. If you believe, then you will see your pets in heaven with you. If you do not, you sentence them to eternal torture and burning with you.

Um… One of my cats, who died two years ago, was a black Persian. Humans are notorious for torturing black cats to death and sometimes cats who are not black. This line of reasoning was supposed to make me recant my statement that humans create hell here on earth? The only thing it did was cause me silent fear of her and wondered if she really had lost her mind.

Somehow I felt she was projecting her anger with me and fear of hell onto her god, an external source, which meant, her tactic to control me, was her way of saying she would harm my cats, both living and dead. Of course, she would not really do such a thing, so she places such a thought onto her god, but it was difficult for me to imagine that a Christian would sink to that line of reasoning. I understand she is scared, but to threaten her daughter with harm to her cats, if she did not recant and believe, was a bit much.

Honestly, can any Christian, despite what they may believe about other animals going to an afterlife, say that this was a sane conclusion to pets being in an afterlife? What sort of deity tortures and burns cats? Can other Christians honestly say that is not sick and demented reasoning? Can they honestly say that this was not an attempt to control another person? Not only that, since when did others go heaven on the basis of someone else’s faith? Where is that in the Christian doctrine? Somehow, I think this is a case of “making it up as you go along”, in order to mentally torture and control others. I am sorry, but the idea of burning cat flesh is just plain stomach turning, not to mention the idea of torturing a cat. Now that is a sick and demented person… um deity… um person… Whatever. What sort of person would worship a deity that would torture and burn innocent cats or even some other pet? Can I get a witness from any Episcopalians, Catholics, or Lutherans (apostate, lapse, or devote) that even St. Francis would object to such a conclusion?

My mother is not Catholic, Episcopalian, or Lutheran nor does she celebrate the Day of St. Francis, with the blessing of pets, but even then, when I was an Episcopalian, I did not hear such a thing ever stated. Pets never once got to heaven (or hell) on the basis of their caregiver’s faith (or lack there of). However, my mother is an Evangelical Fundamentalist, with a belief that heaven would not be heaven without our pets and somehow has managed to twist that belief into something insanely and frighteningly bizarre.

I know what other humanist/atheists/agnostics/non-theists would say, or at least I have a good idea, and I can just imagine what pagans and Wiccans would say such a statement. I think such a demented statement would appall all those various groups.

Now, for any Christian, who was sickened by such a statement, let us replace “cats” with a human child. For some reason, you all cannot carry that feeling of disgust over to that thought nor can you carry it over to another human in general. That is OK, but even so, such a statement is still disturbing to others. I have no clue as to how humans can come up with such things and not find them insanely disturbing, even disgustingly sickening. Regardless, place another animal in the statement and that line of reasoning probably disturbs some of you.

For those Christians who were disturbed by my mother’s line of reasoning, you have just gotten a taste of how many atheists feel about such a statement concerning humans. For me, that statement surpasses the idea that people kill kittens every time they masturbate. My mother’s statement and line of reasoning just went to number one and that one has just taken second place. In some respects, her statement might be funny, but in other respects, it is insanely disturbing.

For a brief moment, I will fall back to my Episcopalian days, just for the sake of appeasing those in the Anglican Communion, Catholics, and Lutherans… What would St. Francis, the Patron Saint of animals, say about such statement? If he were alive today, I wonder if he would have been in such a state of disturbed shock that he became mute or would he have managed a sane come back for the woman? Such a statement does not even fit any Christian doctrine that I know. Either Christians believe “All Dogs Go to Heaven” or they do not, but if they do believe our pets go to heaven, I have yet to hear any Christian make such a statement as my mother did.

One final note concerning this idea of hell from a retired priest, Bishop John Shelby Spong, who I highly respect, even though I do not believe in life after death:


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro