Skip to main content

The Pornography of Religions

By Carl S

“Her head was becoming giddy. Wild with the need of him, yet she fought this need… She had yet to prove her worth to him, in all other ways of importance… what was there that made her behave so recklessly?...sent spirals of many shades of color spinning through her consciousness...she let herself enjoy fully the sweet pain of passion. She knew that she was as hopelessly addicted as an alcoholic who couldn’t stay away from the bottle.”

PornographyImage by nwistheone via Flickr

Whew! Those quotes came directly from a romance novel, a typical example of a romance novel of our time, and I left out the really juicy parts. Of course, this doesn’t qualify as pornography, which is very graphic. Time was when such passages as this were considered raunchy, back when “romance” meant warm, caring, cuddly, not “passionate.” There’s a big demand for these books today; you’ll find them in special sections of bookstores, at yard sales and flea markets, stacks of them. And they’re all pretty much the same. Also, the authors often use pen names, so you don’t know who they are, in much the same way no one knows who really wrote the gospels, and maybe for the same reasons. Suffice it to say, in a free market society, supply rises to meet demand, and there’s a BIG demand for “romance” novels.

In a free market society, consider the top money makers: 1. Drugs (OTC, prescription, illegal, booze); 2. Pornography; 3. Religion; 4. Gambling. They all have the potential to become addictions, sometimes to dangerous degrees. (I worked on day shift with a guy whose wife worked nights, so he stayed home, with his daughter in the next room, got drunk, and watched porno movies. He also confessed that, at some point, when one is over-saturated with porno, the movies “are all alike.” Too much candy?)

Pornography and religion have so much in common, which may explain in part why clergy are sometimes caught accessing child pornography on the web. (I even talked to a clergyman who said he subscribed to the Playboy channel because, “ I need to understand what it’s about.”)

Religion is not chicken soup for the soul, it’s junk food for the soul, because it only satisfies for awhile and the imbiber keeps coming back for the next fix. Pornography excites the senses and imagination, visually and through written description, to the point of inducing masturbation, and still leaves the individual alone, without a real partner to share the love. Similarly, religious church services frequently employ means to excite the senses with wild, unthinking, pure abandoned giving-up, to whatever deity is mutually conjured up. Many church services appear to be a fully clothed, sensuous social circle masturbation, with all the romantic ambience deliberately set up to seduce not only the participants, but a FANTASY person - just like pornography, and often leading to insatiable religious appetites.

My brother once said that he knew women looking for the “perfect man”, but only one who had found him, and she became a nun. She married Jesus, the “perfect” man. For Christians, Jesus is THE romantic, tragic, sacrificial, triumphant, lover. John, “the disciple Jesus loved,” and often quoted by Christians, makes Jesus a romantic figure not unlike those found in romance novels. And, I’ll bet if you read up on writings of noted Christians over the centuries, you’ll find a lot of fantasizing, spiritual masturbation, in the name of the lover Jesus - and maybe Sts. Paul, Francis, etc, also.

The actor Tony Randall once said that pornography is harmless, that all it creates is a demand for more pornography. Much of the religious media is the same. How many of us know, as I do, believers who have dozens of CDs and DVDs of hymns, gospel stories, et al? They involve the same passion-oriented, all-consuming, thoughtless, giddy, and in fact, damn the consequences self absorption as porno. And like porno, it’s drinking sea water. Religion is not chicken soup for the soul, it’s junk food for the soul, because it only satisfies for awhile and the imbiber keeps coming back for the next fix. Jesus is NOT the “real thing.” Jesus is just as much a fantasy as those other romantic gods such as Apollo, Eros, and Bacchus; all Mr. Fantastics. At least the pagans were honest about where their religious bacchanalia led them - to an orgy. (It’s worth noting here the comment by another exChristian, of his relatives being “drunk on Jesus.”)

In order to replace paganism, Christianity found it necessary to adopt some of its rituals, but without the overt sexuality and sensuality the founders abhorred. They found a way to keep their enthusiasts under their control via non-orgasmic raptures and fantasies. They created addicts with these fantastical images of their god; no less addicts than those to pornography, drugs, or alcohol. (And, they eventually found ways to have addicts to those substances transfer their addictions to religion) These PUSHERS, in the minds of their addicts, can do no wrong - be they pope, clergy, Christ, Mohammed, etc. - as long as they preach the words of addiction. And some of these addicts feel the spirit so strongly they will revile, even kill, for their addiction. They are victims, unaware how deep their problem is, or that they have one. How they ever convinced themselves (or let themselves be convinced) that their emotional, irrational, fantasy adorations have anything at all to do with morality remains, to me, a mystery.

How do you detoxify such an addiction, this pornographic religiousness? How do you get those who watch, enjoy, perhaps even believe in those endless hours of gymnastic intercourse in pornography as true, and how do you reach those similarly seduced by those fantastical assertions of Jesus’ miracles? Are not all of these things make-believe, however exciting?

It’s a pity, and sometimes a tragedy, to steal from the real thing. And suddenly it occurs to me that it isn’t just the children who are being seduced and molested. Can I sue the church for alienating my wife’s affections?


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro