Skip to main content

Have We Already Passed the Tipping Point?

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose)

All positive social changes of a sweeping nature seem to involve a tipping point. The abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, civil rights for blacks, and broad social acceptance of gays all appeared to be beyond the reach of Americans just a few generations ago. Those who spoke out and worked to overturn the entrenched, tradition-bound norms were often judged to be tilting at windmills, or trying to turn the tide with a spoon. And yet, in each case, a generation eventually came along which achieved the improbable, and the norms of all of these except slavery were overturned within the last 100 years - the last two, civil rights for blacks and broad acceptance of gays, both within my adult lifetime. There may be some lessons here regarding a tipping point for our country’s religious saturation, as I shall explain.

I went to a small city high school of about 1,200 students during the late 1950s and early 1960s, and didn’t know of a single gay student or teacher. They were there, of course, but no one was “out” in those days as known gays suffered terrible indignities and were fodder for jokes even amongst those of us who saw ourselves as good, kind people. In some states, homosexual acts were illegal, even in private.

Also, very shortly thereafter, when I was stationed in Key West in the Navy, I incurred the wrath of a friend when I went into a “colored” bathroom at a gas station. He was from Florida, while I am from Maine and had never before seen more than a couple dozen blacks in my whole life. I didn’t think it was beneath my dignity to go into the colored bathroom, so I did. But he explained that that wasn’t the point. He claimed that if any blacks saw me go into “their” bathroom, they might decide to do me some harm. I still question whether that was true, but I never did it again.

In each of those sweeping changes that occurred during the 20th century, it appears that there was a period of many years where there were a few voices in the wilderness, but little progress. But, once the tipping point was reached and change began, it picked up speed and turned into an avalanche that swept the vast majority of the population along with it. Who today has anything to say against women having the vote? Or who opposes equal rights for blacks? There is still some opposition to gay marriage, but clearly the tide has turned and in the near future it will seem strange that there was a time when gays were not allowed to marry other gays.

In recent years we have witnessed a rather rapid increase in the “nones,” those who check “none” when asked for their religious affiliation in surveys. Only some of these are atheists or agnostics (about 7% of the total population), but all are admitting that they are avoiding organized religion. The “nones” as a percentage of the U.S. adult population increased from 16% in 2007 to 25% in 2016. This is more than a 50% increase in just nine years. In starker terms, the number of “nones” in the U.S. increased from about 37 million to about 63 million over that period, an increase of roughly 26 million people. Am I crazy to suggest that maybe we have already reached the tipping point toward the majority abandonment of organized religion in this country?

As we might have expected, the young are in the vanguard of this sweeping change, as 39% of millennials (age 18 to 33) ticked the “none” box.
As James A. Haught pointed out on these pages recently ( ), religion was losing its power “even before the upsurge of ‘nones.’” Surely there are many reasons for the rise of the “nones” in recent years, but several of the more important ones can be considered backlashes against the religious establishment, including the clergy pedophile scandal, anti-abortion efforts, and anti-gay marriage efforts. The people have spoken loudly and clearly on these issues and condemned the religious establishment for their complicity.

Once the tipping point was reached and change began, it picked up speed and turned into an avalanche that swept the vast majority of the population along with it.In the long run, the election of Donald Trump may serve to hasten the day when the religious are in the minority. He courted evangelical and fundamentalist voters and appears ready to try to push their views into the nation’s laws. But, it could be that the tide has already turned, and the backlash against his efforts will only continue to swell the numbers and political and social influence of the “nones.”

It is true that religion has seen strong counter-insurgencies during the three “Great Awakenings” of the past 275 or so years, but this doesn’t mean another revival is certain. The Enlightenment has dramatically changed the social and scientific course of the world forever; there has never been an anti-Enlightenment movement that amounted to anything. Some sweeping social changes are forever, and the present rise of the “nones” could well signal the beginning of the end of one of the last and toughest battles of the Enlightenment, that against religious dogma.

Yes, Islam and Hinduism are growing in some parts of the world, so religion is going to be a problem area for the world for a long time to come. But, Religious affiliation has dried up to little more than a cult fringe in much of Europe, and the U.S. appears headed in the same direction. Of course it’s a little too soon to begin the celebrations, but if we non-believers continue to speak out, and to support secular efforts and organizations, we can help increase the momentum of this great, sweeping social change.

Psychological studies have shown that wherever the number of non-believers is seen as large and growing, they become more socially acceptable to the religious, thus amplifying their impact. So, if you can, please stand up and speak out for an end to religious influence in our time!


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi