Skip to main content

Methinks Thou Doth Protest Too Much

By Carl S ~

Do these words sound familiar?

"You guys deny God and that Jesus is God, but you're fighting against what you know is true. You know in your hearts he's real, but you keep coming up with more protests, saying the evidence shows he can’t exist. He is your judge, and you're just taunting him to punish you, but he won't because he loves you. You only want to be immoral, so you use your denial of him as an excuse to sin. You're too strident, too protesting and you're lying to yourselves. You'll never convince me otherwise. You need to let go and let God. Stop being so negative. Find peace again by allowing him to do his work in you."

On the other hand - aren't the ones saying these things protesting too much? If the God they claim really exists, why would they need to defend his existence so stridently? Can't their god fight his own battles; does he need them to do it for him? That's cowardly. Do they really think they're morally superior to those who don't believe in him? Or do they protest too much about that?
"People like you want God out of public life. You don't want the word of God to be heard and heeded. Why, God is less spoken of now than ever! This country needs to return to prayer and bible readings in school, to the Ten Commandments posted in courts and in public parks. Then we'll get God's blessings on us."

You've had centuries to prove any of those acts make a good nation. Did we really get God’s blessings when we had enforced prayer in school, forced scriptural readings favoring a domineering religion, when people were biblically condoning racism, sexual repression, and oppression of homosexuals, etc.? And how can you say that your God, who still remains hidden in the closet, is being faded out of society? Did you know there are 15 religion channels on DirectTV alone? You've got people preaching and praying and praising around the clock! Your God never appears on a single TV religious program to endorse or deny the contradictory claims made in his name. Free speech is available for his many spielers, yet there are no channels for those who disagree with religions. Isn't all that religious programming just too entertaining and addictive, plus profitable for the money-makers? Would those 24/7 Religion Infomercials endure for years, if they weren't? Your god is a puppet.

"God" and "Jesus" are products, just like Mickey Mouse, Elvis, gambling casinos, etc. All have everything to do with emotions and psychological responses, including the immovable faith in luck. The name of God is needed by politicians. It's tradition. No one running for office wants to distance himself from evangelicals, or Lincoln, FDR, and other presidents who (in spite of their personal take on "God"), dragged God out at opportune times to get votes, power, and to heap shame on opponents. Religion itself is, after all, politics. Combine absolute religion with absolute politics and you have absolute corruption. That God, of corruption, is useful, so he isn't dead yet.

We protest too much? Oh no. We don't protest enough.God, as the awe-inspiring, ever-loving and terrifying threat to his enemies, with the traditional pap image of benevolent father figure, is absent in the reality of this world. And yet, the more obvious this becomes, the more the religious protest too much. Get over it. Why, the name "God" doesn't mean what it used to. It's used in bedrooms, in the excitement of game shows, in TV and movie comedies. "God" has entered the cliché’ mainstream, with as much meaning as "Oh hell!" or "damn!" or "spiritual," and the (increasingly used), "It was surreal" remark. If you say I'm denying God, you'll have to be more specific when you say "God," because there are an awful lot of believers who won't agree with your interpretation.

You say we protest too much about "In God we trust" on our currency. (These words are placed next to the image of Thomas Jefferson, on the quarter dollar coin. What a contradiction. He would have rejected that motto.) Think about those words: Here we have a country with the most powerful armed forces in the world, with the largest stockpile of nuclear missiles, and most sophisticated conventional weaponry, far surpassing those of every other country. The U.S. has an overarching surveillance network on its own citizens, with CCTV cameras on practically every city comer, in its stores, banks, and other businesses. Its citizens possess the largest amount of privately owned weaponry in the world. Its intelligence network includes CODIS, a database made up of fingerprints and DNA samples from convicted persons, including those who have served their sentences. These are available to investigators of crimes. The U.S.A. has the NSA and airport security check-in agents. And yet it asserts: "In ‘God’ We Trust." Don't make me laugh! That claim is an obvious lie.

Thousands of men and women like you spread the false propaganda this is a Christian country. Thousands more stand in pulpits and on megachurch stages preaching things as true which they have no evidence at all for, and never had. They openly lie by omission, by ignoring and denying scientific evidence, and by subterfuge. And they teach innocent children to trust them as serious authority figures. And even when they are abusing children, they lie to them and to their parents.

Fundamentalist Christians should have no problem embracing a Donald Trump. They already accept a bible and a god, both of them outright lying and contradicting themselves. They respect clergy who claim to revere both of them. Accepting those beliefs wholeheartedly, without question, anything can be claimed, and justified. Democracy is compromised and threatened.

And you tell us we protest too much? Oh no. We don't protest enough.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro