Skip to main content

Mr. Meanie

By Carl S. ~

Back in the 1950's, before Peanuts or Calvin and Hobbes, there was a cartoon strip called, “Pogo.” It was a sophisticated and sometimes political commentary of the times. During one Christmas season, a strip ran in which one character confronted another with the words, “You told my kid that there’s no Santa Claus. What are you trying to do - destroy a child's faith in his father?”

Last night, I watched “How the Universe works,” while my wife napped. It's the kind of program she would avoid because it's loaded with scientific information, and therefore, is T MI for her mind. To me, just observing what's known about the Universe is awesome. When she awoke, I left the show on ‘til it ended. Maybe I was feeling mean; her religion teaches a deity created and keeps this Universe in order, and clearly the evidence shows this is not true. Facts erode faith.

I just finished reading ex-pastor Jerry DeWitt‘s book, “Hope After Faith”. (Which I recommend to everyone.) By recounting his journey out of faith, unintentionally, he, like the Pogo character, “destroys a believer’s faith” in clergy. Now, isn't that MEAN? To destroy comfy fantasies that harm no one? Oh, but we on this site know that, very often, religious fantasies are NOT harmless.

And think about this: what would have happened if one “destroyer” were able to destroy the faith of the 9/11 martyrs in the imams who indoctrinated them? As Wizened Sage has noted, the faith of the believer is actually faith in his teachers. Aren’t “threats to the faith” actually threats to the mutually-authorized authority of clerics?

Non-believers such as us are meanies, spoil-sports. Once, I asked a 7 yr. old boy, in front of his mother, if someone who drowned children was a had person , referring to the god he is taught to worship. Much later on, I learned that his mother was moved to tears because of this. I did not apologize for being a Grinch by casting doubt; I hope the pain inoculated the child from believing everything he’s taught.

My becoming a meanie {as the Grinch becoming nice) didn’t happen overnight. First, I made searching for the truth a passionate pursuit, digging up all the data available, pleasant and not nice at all, equally. One thing became obvious right away; I noticed that while I criticized myself for mistakes, many others did not do the same. Perhaps they were just better at lying to themselves, cleverer at covering up THEIR mistakes. Yet, this is liberating for a “conscience-bound” mind. I started to wonder if believers have thought about this. It's a way of keeping from falling into self-deception ruts. As my faults as an average person are no big deal, for the most part, neither are theirs.

Picture a Bible-toting member of a prison ministry preaching to an inmate about “God died for your sins.” If you see yourself as no big deal, your response might be, “Who me? MY sins? Come on! Besides, what do you think I’m in prison for? The governor can pardon a murderer. You're telling me your god can do the same for me for my sentence. If you're sincere, tell him to get me the f**k out of here.” No prison-minister wants to confront THOSE realities; they‘re in the business of distributing the feel-goods. They're outta here.

It's no wonder that clergy are threatened by meanies, that they warn against thinking and doubting. Non-thinking is praised as virtuous. Behind every dogma is the warning, CURIOSITY = Death and Punishment. They know that when you seriously, and with an open mind, think, you start doubting. You can't stop. Your mind won’t shut up. Continually learning threatens blind beliefs and their demands for concomitant obedience.

After massacres, citizens are urged to come together to pray. What is the nature of those prayers to be? Are they supposed to be prayers of petition, praise, or penance? Prayers of thanksgiving? Weren’t those victims PREVIOUSLY prayed for daily, by parents, guardians, neighbors and congregants, to be protected from harm? Didn‘t many of the victims themselves pray the day of their slaughter, “deliver us from evil?” Why then should the survivors be told to pray to the protector who failed to protect them? For questioning their attitude, we would be condemned by those believers who would say, “How dare you be so CRUEL to ask those questions?” But, why should the reality of “We have only each other to depend on” be ignored?

Talk about real meanies – consider those Christians who want their 10 Commandments on public properties and in public buildings, like we should all just go along with this. I looked up the meaning of “covet,” as in “covet your neighbor's wife, slave, ass, and other properties”. “Covet” means “to desire” what is rightfully another's. Hell, there's nothing wrong with desiring! And looking at another man’s wife or Porsche with desire does not constitute adultery or theft! Only a spoil-sport with a negative attitude about humans would damn such ordinary feelings.

As an example of thinking about something, those who‘ve seen “the Life of Pi” will remember the hero’s story about his fantastic, though fictional, account, as being “Gods preferred” one. This would explain all the scriptural stories of the world’s religions: fantastic, beyond rationality, super-natural, etc., including, of course, the creation story in Genesis. Nevertheless, evolution is the much more fascinating story, and it is truth itself. (And without the guilt! Now why would anyone object to that?) Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the true story of evolution is astounding.

Consider this: Never before in history have ordinary people been able to see what is going on worldwide in real time. Is there “too much information?” Do we need to witness reports of deaths from flooding, landslides, tornadoes, earthquakes, slaughter, starvation, plagues? What of the mass killings of children? We can tune in to nature programs and watch lions, hyenas, eagles, viruses and preventable diseases eating the victims alive. Our hearts and our monies go out to relieve suffering of those closest to our consciences and human caring.

Now consider this: If you were viewing and made aware of ALL the suffering and needless deaths on earth every second of every day, you would go INSANE from being overwhelmed and helpless to prevent it. Only a psychopath would tolerate ALL of it and allow it to continue if he had the power to end it - a psychopath with an INFINITE capacity for INDIFFERENCE. From this vantage point, am I not describing “God?”

Think about paranoia. If a person suffering from paranoia is one who thinks (knows?) everyone is out to get him or her, won’t that person FIND “confirmation” for it everywhere, in spite of all evidence to the contrary? You CAN’T effectively argue against such a passionate belief. And I wonder if this same mindset operates in “confirmations” of prayer working, and “hearing” the voice of God. Aren’t these also simply reflections of a mental state, all in the brain of the person, without any basis in reality?

Am I being a meanie again in pointing this out to the true believer? So be it!


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not