Skip to main content

Buying on Faith

By WizenedSage (Galen Rose) ~

Why should anyone buy into a religion that only pays off after you die? Look around you. Can anyone prove that Christians are happier, healthier, or more fortunate in any way than non-believers in this life? Of course not. In fact, some of us suspect that many Christians may even prefer suffering. It has been claimed that Mother Theresa withheld pain medication from her patients because she thought suffering was good for them, making them better able to appreciate the suffering of Jesus on the cross.

So the payoff must come after you die. But, do the salespeople of this religion ever show you a sample of what you’re going to get then, in anything except more words? Words, threats, and promises are all you ever get. Would you buy a piece of property in Florida on nothing more than a salesperson’s words? No pictures, no video, no actual visit, just words? Wouldn’t this make you an excellent candidate for a swindle?

Christianity gets your attendance in church, your time in prayer and evangelizing, and your money, and you get . . . nothing but hopes and wishes; one of which being the hope that you aren’t getting scammed. Religion preys on - and succeeds through - those who will buy based on nothing more than the words of some people who wrote thousands of years ago; people we don’t know and don’t know anything about. These were people who wrote about miracles like talking snakes and jackasses, shepherds’ staffs turning into snakes, saints coming out of their graves and walking through a town, and a man whose prodigious strength depended on the length of his hair. These are basically the same men who wrote those assurances that if you will worship their god, you can live forever.

Personally, I don’t understand how it can make sense to anyone to buy anything from the guys who wrote a string of tall tales like that. How can these superstitious primitives still command any credibility in a scientific age with such obviously made-up stories? And, if I can’t believe this story - “Then Samson said, ‘With a donkey's jawbone I have made donkeys of them. With a donkey's jawbone I have killed a thousand men’" - then why should I believe that a man was a corpse for several days and then just stood up and walked away to preach some more? How is the latter any more believable than the former? By what criteria could one story be believable and the other not believable? Both require the suspension of the laws of nature, laws which have never been known to be suspended before, anytime or anywhere.

And then they tell me that if I can’t or won’t believe their story, then I will suffer for an eternity in a lake of fire after I die. Now that sounds to me like an ancient version of carrot and stick, or good cop/bad cop. If they can’t entice me with heaven, then they threaten me with hell. Could this be a simple intimidation tactic, do you think?

As Greta Christina so eloquently put it, on her blog, “Religion is ultimately dependent on belief in invisible beings, inaudible voices, intangible entities, undetectable forces, and events and judgments that happen after we die. It therefore has no reality check.” There is absolutely no testable evidence for any of these things beyond what other people have said or written, and this is why we are told to trust to faith, to rely entirely on what religious leaders tell us is and isn't true about the world.

Unfortunately, it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that religious leaders are wrong far more than they are right (if they are ever right). Down through the ages, man has worshiped thousands of gods, whose descriptions contradict one another, which is solid proof that religious leaders are almost always (or always) wrong.

And our intuitions, our feelings, aren’t any more trustworthy than our religious leaders. Moslems commonly speak of feeling Allah within their hearts, while for Hindus it is Vishnu or Krishna, and for Christians it is god or Jesus. We can be absolutely certain that such intuitions are wrong far more than right (if they’re ever right) since no religion can claim more than a third of the world’s people. Do the math; most of the people MUST BE wrong, most of the time, about what they’re feeling!

In 1925, a man “sold” the Eiffel Tower by claiming it was to be torn down and sold for scrap. I can understand someone being taken in by such a story. After all, he could see that the Tower was real, and that it might have some rust on it here and there, and reason told him that its upkeep must be very expensive to the city. The buyer only needed to have a little faith in the seller. But being taken in by a story that some man died and then came back to life, and if I believe this then I can live forever and ever in a spirit-world paradise that no one has ever seen? Now that takes a whole lot of faith. No salesperson can show me this spirit-world; all he can do is promise me it’s there, and claim he knows this for sure, because . . . because someone else told him it was there. No thanks. My chances are better on the Florida land deal. At least I know Florida is real, because I’ve been there.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two