Skip to main content

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part V.

By Robert Conner ~

Back in 2005, while researching material for a book on magic in the career of Jesus, I read Daniel Ogden’s sourcebook, Magic, Witchcraft, and Ghosts in the Greek and Roman Worlds, and recall being surprised at how closely the post mortem appearances of Jesus in the gospels of Luke and John match Greco- Roman ghost stories. My initial search of the available literature turned up nothing that specifically addressed the similarities, but convinced of the parallels, I included a chapter, “The Resurrection as Ghost Story,” in my book, Jesus the Sorcerer: Exorcist and Prophet of the Apocalypse, released in 2006.
 
Why would elements from ghost stories end up in the gospels? What could possibly motivate the author of a gospel to compose a resurrection narrative that reads like a ghost story? It turns out there are a number of reasons.
 
First of all, most people in the first century took the existence of ghosts for granted: “Shortly before dawn, Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake. When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. ‘It’s a ghost!’ they said, and cried out in fear.” (Matthew 14:25-26) And, as we have seen, people of the era were far less critical readers than people of today; they accepted the fantastic at face value. In fact, they expected it. Even Jesus complained, “Unless you see signs and wonders, you will never believe.” (John 4:48) For many ancient listeners, sexing up a story with elements of the supernatural would have made it more credible, not less. Who wants to read a ho-hum Bible story in which nothing incredible happens?


There is a broad consensus that the gospels are primarily based on oral tradition passed down for at least one or two generations. The gospel of Luke tends to support that view: “...passed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word.” (Luke 1:2) Given the passage of decades and the chaos of the First Jewish-Roman War, direct witnesses of any event of Jesus’ lifetime would likely have been few and far between. So we already have three plausible motives for including ghost story elements in the gospels—belief in the supernatural, eagerness to accept the fantastic, and institutional memory in the early Christian communities that was patchy or completely missing.


The gospels don’t even pretend to be history as currently understood—the gospels are religious propaganda, not a PBS documentary about the life and times of Jesus from Nazareth. The gospels “have been written so you may believe Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.” (John 20:31) How would we expect the authors to encourage that belief? We would expect them to use the cultural elements readily available to them, such as quoting freely and frequently from the Old Testament. Or borrowing supernatural elements accepted by the wider culture, like ghost stories, for example.


Last year I decided the topic of ghost belief in the New Testament deserved a book-length treatment, the first ever to the best of my knowledge, so after doing more extensive research, I wrote up the material, found a publisher, and Apparitions of Jesus: The Resurrection as Ghost Story appeared. But if I thought I was the first to notice the uncanny similarities between ghost stories and resurrection stories, it turns out I was off by at least 18 centuries.


The first writer to compare Jesus’ post resurrection appearances to spectral apparitions was a Greek philosopher and critic of Christianity named Celsus who wrote a lengthy work, Alēthēs Logos, or True Doctrine, that refuted various aspects of the Christian cult. Apparently having noticed the phantasmal quality of the resurrection accounts, Celsus says that Jesus appeared to his disciples “like a ghost hovering before their perception.” (Contra Celsum, VII, 35)— Celsus’ vocabulary suggests something insubstantial drifting before one’s vision. As historian John Dominic Crossan would later remark, “apparitions of Jesus do not constitute resurrection. They constitute apparitions, no more and no less.” (Neotestamentica 37 (2003), 47).
 
What features of the gospel narratives could have caused an informed second century critic to characterize Jesus’ post mortem manifestations as ghost stories? As it happens, there were several. Then as now, ghosts could appear and disappear suddenly: “[Jesus] became invisible to them.” (Luke 24:31) Lucian turns the sudden disappearance of a ghost to comic effect when the household dog frightens off Eucrates’ wife, returned from the grave to claim a golden sandal—“she vanished because of the barking.” (Lover of Lies, 27)
Paradoxically, ghosts could also assume solid, tactile form, indistinguishable from the living.


“While they were talking about these things, [Jesus] stood in their midst and said to them, ‘Peace be with you!’ But they were alarmed and afraid, thinking they were seeing a spirit. He said to them, ‘Why are you terrified and why do doubts arise in your hearts? Touch me and see, because a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.’ And saying this, he showed them his hands and feet.

But even in their joy they did not believe him, and while they were wondering, he said to them, ‘Do you have anything here to eat?’ They gave him a piece of fish and he took it and ate it in front of them.” (Luke 24:36-43) That ancient ghosts could appear from nowhere, eat, and then disappear is conspicuously proven by the Phlegon’s tale of the ghost of Polykritos, a man who returns from the dead after the ill-omened birth of his hermaphroditic child.

“The people had clustered together and were arguing about the portent when the ghost took hold of the child, forced most of the men back, hastily tore the child limb from limb, and began to devour him...he consumed the entire body of the boy except for his head and then suddenly disappeared.” (William Hansen,
Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels, 30-31, my translation.)


Everyone in the world, past and present, knows ghosts can pass through barriers that the living can’t breach, a recurring theme in ghost lore. Jesus’ appearances tend to occur at night or toward the evening (Matthew 28:1; Mark 16:2; Luke 24:29; John 21:4), a time particularly associated with hauntings. Liminal times and places, doors, rivers, crossroads, dawn, dusk, as well as transitioning from sleep to the waking state, are suited to the manifestation of ghosts.
Jesus’ nighttime manifestations in the gospel of John—“in the evening of the first day of the week” (John 20:19)—occur even though “the doors were locked” (John 20:19, 26) The Greek text of John uses the verb kleiō, “to lock,” from kleis, “key,” to convey the astounding fact that “Jesus came and stood in their midst.” The ancients regarded doorways with a high degree of anxiety; the Romans had no less than three minor deities concerned with doors, Cardea, the goddess of hinges, Forculus, the god of the door itself, and Limentinus, the god of the threshold. A tomb itself is a doorway of sorts: “because of the presence of these spirits of the dead, the threshold, like the cross-roads, was a spot particularly adapted to the performance of magic rites, just as such rites were often performed on graves.” (Marbury Ogle, American Journal of Philology 32 (1911), 270.)
Given our different cultural assumptions, westerners living in the 21st century read the New Testament much differently than Mediterranean peoples living in the 1st century. Appreciating how pagan contemporaries described early Christianity requires we step back into the mindset of their era, reading the gospel texts in the light of their expectations, not of ours. In the next installment we will find Celsus had another crucial insight that anticipated modern thinking on apparitions.




Several books authored by Robert Conner are available here: Amazon.com.
Conner's current editor offers many more salient authors and titles here: http://tellectual.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

ACTS OF GOD

By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not