Skip to main content

This Site for Christian Education

By Carl S ~

Some explanations an individual will give for believing: "I feel God's presence in my heart." And: "Millions believe as I do." One time, I pointed out how one cleric told me I would enter heaven merely by being a good person, while another cleric said I would not if I didn't accept Jesus. The believer said, “Well, that's his opinion." Some people, rather than talk about the existence of their god or the supernatural when you give a reason why they don't exist, will avoid discussing these things, by saying, “Well, that's your opinion."

Everyone has feelings, beliefs, and opinions. Feelings, beliefs, and opinions are neither good nor bad, virtuous nor evil. You're real, you can't help having feelings. You may feel lust in your heart for a woman or a man, or feel, "I could kill him for that," or you'll fluctuate between feelings of embracing or punching someone. Feelings vary constantly and change. Sometimes they can do a 180 degree turnaround. (As when intense feelings are reined in by reason; then positive changes lead to positive actions.) People can have feelings for fictional characters; millions of past believers felt the presence of their gods. The people and issues you come to care about can manipulate your feelings. Clerics, cult leaders, bosses, politicians, etc., all take advantage of vulnerable feelings. You can't trust feelings alone to make decisions. Many a man or woman has been devastated emotionally by a spouse they knew in their heart loved them.

Only the actions followed through from feelings, opinions, and beliefs, are good or evil. Since so many actions resulting from religious beliefs, feelings, and opinions, have turned out to have evil consequences, this is reason enough to distrust them. Also, there must be some reason why all true believers are fearful, whenever even kidding about the bizarre beliefs they hold to be absolutely true gets them agitated, troubled, even very angry. Isn’t it fascinating to find that simple, reasonable questions and viewpoints are the archenemies of faiths? Maybe we need to educate ourselves as to why this is so, to deal with it.

Maybe another site would open up a discussion about the relationships among beliefs, opinions, feelings, even tastes. (Isn't picking a denomination a matter of taste?) We can be assured religious sites are telling their readers that lustful or vengeful feelings are evil. This is one example of the weird and misinformed “Christian education guidance" they promote. It's all one sided; try to inject a reasonable inquiry that's a challenge to blind faith, and you'll be banned forever. (Religions are fond of banning forever. Take hell, for instance.) There's a whole lotta manipulatin' of feelings going on.

Is ExChristian. net a major source for Christian education? You'd better believe it. (Where else will Christians hear about the Council of Nicea?) Okay, previously I wrote in "Christian Education is an oxymoron" in the negative about this subject. In that, I defined true "education" as a method to deduce truth from falsehood, with emphasis on considering all evidence pro and con, in order to do so. "Christian Education" signs posted on churches, web sites, and in bible study classes, have nothing to do with true education. They are indoctrinational, meaning that which is picked and chosen for propaganda purposes only. To paraphrase some philosophical authors: Facts, under such "education," cease to exist because they are ignored, and an astounding amount of unbelief is required to keep belief possible. These are established facts about dogmatic belief systems

Christians are ignorant about their faith. One way to become un-ignorant is through information available on ExChristian.The "Christian education" I'm referring to here means education "for" Christians, and as an extension, for all dogmatic believers, as well as seculars. How do we know this? Well, one thing we find if we pay attention to and/or question them: Christians are ignorant about their faith. One way to become un-ignorant is through information available on ExChristian. The site is therefore an educational one. Here, every aspect of religious belief is covered, and questions considering theological and biblical debates forbidden to be spoken about in church circles or bible class discussions are openly addressed. Here is a wonderland, a new world they are never exposed to. Come fly with us.

Here, believers will find rational debates, personal testimonies, and references to the many historical sources for Christianity they never knew existed. There are books recommended to answer their questions. Whether they have doubts about what they've been taught or merely seek to strengthen their convictions, they’re still exposed to knowledge and open-mindedness. This includes the reasons why others are not convinced as they are, or who once were just as convinced, and why they no longer are. One is free here, where even those who agree can disagree, without guilt or threats of hellfire, bodily harm, or any other psychological or conscience-punishments. The only reason to fear ExChristian is fear itself.

One of my Christian Right relatives presented me with a wager, in her kitchen. She told me to "bet on God’s existence," saying that if I do, I gain heaven, and if I'm wrong, I've lost nothing. This implies, of course, that her god wouldn't know if I was being insincere. So, I'm using a different kind of wager with her: Go ahead and bet I'm wrong about this site. If your faith is strong, what have you lost‘? You're more convinced. What have you got to lose‘? I'm considering sending her a card with an Easter Bunny on it, saying, "Don't believe in the Easter Bunny? Go ahead, just believe. What have you got to lose?" (Gee, I never knew the requirement for admission to everlasting bliss was just as easy!) Just try and find such fresh-air free speech on Christian sites!


Popular posts from this blog

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi