Skip to main content

The Holy Ghost and Donald Trump

By Carl S ~
Betty Alexander, 85, holds the flag quilt she made and 
wants to send to President Donald Trump."The Holy Spirit
just told me it should be for President Trump," she said.   
Story LINK

Picked up my wife after her church service. There were still a lot of cars in the lot. So I asked her what's happening? She said a missionary from Oregon, clear across this country, on the opposite coast, was speaking. So I asked, “What's the subject matter? She said, “The Holy Ghost.” I held my tongue. (Come on; nobody travels clear across the country to talk about the “Holy Ghost.” He's there to raise money.)

My immediate thought was to ask her if another member of the congregation, Rev. Sullivan, was present. You see, some time ago, it was Rev. Sullivan, a retired pastor, who said something I still remember from a lunch attended by several church members, his wife, my wife, and me. There was a theological discussion which included the “Holy Ghost.” I, the lone sane voice, became ill at ease when having to listen to religion b.s. I vacated the restaurant, but not before I brought up the fact that the Holy Ghost god, declared co-equal to a father and son god, was created at the Council of Nicea. A short time after, my wife came out and asked me to rejoin the others. She added, “He told me the Holy Ghost was created at the Council of Nicea.” So, with this background, you understand my temptation, at her church, to ask if the Rev. Sullivan stood up to tell the missionary this information.

In case you haven't noticed, the “Nicene” Holy Ghost differs from the gospel versions. Nicea created a third god who, unlike the father and son gods, doesn't have a body. Also notice that Jesus, Paul, and the apostles portray this Ghost as a kind of arch-angel or sprite. He might be a positive hallucinogenic experience. Then, as today, “feeling the Spirit” often means having an LSD experience without the LSD. This “gift” of the Spirit is said to impart understanding of dogma in a manner akin to an “Aha!” Buddhist insight. (Why “he” wasn't around when Jesus had to patiently explain his nutty parables to those of “little understanding” has never been addressed.)

The Holy Spirit of scriptures is an imp who confuses minds with the “alternative wisdom” of God, which is “foolishness” to the world. He's the “explainer,” the press agent, for the other two. He's the damage controller who eases doubts with feel-good assurances that are good enough to keep objectors pacified. You can bet, most of the time whenever the “Holy Ghost” is mentioned, it's implied the audience should shut up and listen. But usually, the testifier is talking about his or her personal feelings more than anything else!

But not saying anything at the time she mentioned “the Holy Ghost” led me to thinking about something else: There's a connection between a gathering of fundamentalists who voted for, and still support Donald Trump 20 months after his election, and their listening to a man speaking about the Holy Ghost. It has to do with the indoctrination ingrained in them. Those keep-the-faith believers are blithely unaware of knowing they absorbed it. Habitually, for over two thousand years, believers have accepted the “alternative truths and fake news” of their religion as the only important realities, and have rejected evidence to the contrary outright, without thinking and certainly without reflection. So...

The president will say one thing today and contradict what he said the next day. This should be acceptable to Christians, who listen to their clergy using the same “surreal” practice. They've been taught to habitually overlook and/or forgive the faults and lies of authority figures they've been raised to revere and trust. It should come as no surprise they'd elect someone like Mr. Trump (“anointed by God,” according to some leading evangelicals.) Other-realities have been familiar to them for centuries.

Scared, sincere believers have followed their feelings and backed whoever or whatever the clergy recommends, to counter what they feel are threats to their faith. (Even when they know better, are they afraid to believe differently?) Faith is a slippery tightrope to be walking on, in a world of solid evidence contradicting and diluting it; one is in “danger” of merely landing on one's feet in a world of everyone else's everyday existence.

“Slippery” is a word I find myself using often these days. My wife and I, “at our age,” have to move cautiously, since slipping and falling down can mean broken bones. But “slippery” is something we should all be aware of, especially when it comes to religion, politics, philosophies, or even psychology. It's so easy to slip if you aren't careful to find what's true and what isn't! For a prominent example, notice how easily Christian politicians come out speaking God this and God that. Beware. “God” is a useful platitude with different slippery meanings to different hearers. Those politicos are dragging out a slippery slope for the trusting to slide down, on their way to being caught in a religio-politico web. Those politicians, like their pastors, are in the business of selling a product they themselves don't have faith in. Only the gullible assume they sincerely believe what they claim to. Depending on faith is easier than thinking, if it's in a group. It's much easier to slide rather than think.

Religion is infiltrating civil governments toward the end of taking them over. Religions bring slippery, slimy, dogmas which are dangerous not only to societies, but to themselves. * All theologies are slippery slopes. * Think of how fast the slide will be if genocide, justified by the command of a god figure, is already the first step on it, and the next step is war on civil rights. The slippery slide can begin by taking the first step of declaring abortion “murder,” to executing abortionists. Then, how fast will it be before women are sentenced and jailed for having miscarriages? If one can accept and worship a god whose ends justify the means, then one is in danger of sliding into all manner of atrocities oneself. Think of how quickly and easily it will be to suddenly go from revering a name to executing a man for blasphemy.

It's slippery to maintain dogmas based on the belief in words of unknowable men who believed in a plethora of invisible beings. One's emotional bearings can become unbalanced due to not watching every step, though the distance between the clouds one is walking the tightrope on, and the ground of reality beneath, is less that one's height. It’s fear of falling that keeps the believer trying to balance. Faith requires minds, when challenged, to grab for what one has been told is solid while thrashing against obvious truths, instead of accepting them.

And so we have believers who believed, and will continue to believe, Mr. Trump. His lies and denials and alternative realities are of the same material woven into the very fabric of Christianity they've grown up with. Those who listen raptly as a clergyman talks about the “Holy Ghost,” are open to accepting ridiculous and contradictory fabrications.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi