Skip to main content

A Matter of Trust

By Carl S ~

No one at my wife's church asks me what I think of their pastor. They probably don't want to know anymore than they would want to know what I have to say about the beliefs pushed there. My answer is ready anyway; "I don't trust him."

Science I trust, as the method to decipher what is true or not. As I told my wife, contrary to what she believed, the truth is very hard to find. But, I respect science to a great extent because science respects humans. Science respects your mind, your intelligence, freedom of thought, and very much encourages them. Science does NOT tell you to believe without proof, but encourages you to find out for yourself; to doubt, question, test, refute or even overturn, what you have been told. Your curiosity is VERY important to scientists.

All of these respects are absent in religions, as they demand you subject yourself to their authority. Your very humanness is considered "sinful." There is a different rule in science, a rule of respect, and giving credit where credit is due. Though differences of opinion may arise from time to time - naturally there will be arguments and controversies - those who make discoveries and bring forth new theories are credited for them, along with those who influenced or assisted them. I sometimes find it difficult to read scientific articles, for example, because they meticulously credit their sources in the text (scientists, doctors, lab technicians, along with their schools, labs, etc.) in detail. It's what's called fairness, integrity, and providing sources for confirmation of what is claimed. Respect, honesty, giving credit - these are all good reasons to respect science.

Science and religion are diametrically opposed. One demands evidence, while the other rejects all calls for it. One earnestly searches for provable facts while the other is indifferent to them. By not giving due credit, religion lies by omission. When have you ever heard a Christian spokesman thank Zoroaster for the origins of dualism, angels, the last judgment, or the wars between the forces of good and evil? All of these things originated from that Persian prophet (although they may be even older, in pre-literate history). Do the Imams of Allah likewise give credit to Zoroaster? Have any of them thanked the ancient Egyptians for inventing an afterlife? Is there one single clergy member honest enough to say that the words in his NT text can only be "attributed" to Jesus, or that all the scriptures are only word-of-mouth based, and no one knows who actually wrote them?

Yet, thousands of these people ask for your respect and call themselves "reverend." What's to revere? They don't have respect for your mind, or your differences of opinion, or your freedom to make your own moral decisions. It's a one way street. And, disgustingly, they see you as being morally bad just in being born. How can anyone respect someone who tells you not to even ask, "What if what you're telling us is just not so?" With "credentials" like that, without openness to scrutiny and verification against reality, and denying your RIGHT of evidence, what justifies their “authority?”

Then we have the churches. Some people are content with non-reality and these preaching "experts" with all the answers, many of which are, ironically, bald-faced admissions of ignorance, such as, "We’ll know some day," or "God works in mysterious ways." Their belief- placebos, seldom examined, are like household gods reduced to the size of raggedy teddy bears and as familiar as comfortable old shoes with personalities. One dares not suggest cold scientific (albeit fascinating) reality in their House of Delusion, as an alternative to blind faith. Sadly, offering any alternatives in that environment would be taken as an attack, and repelled like an invasion.

I have a six year old great-nephew who went with his dad today to have his dad's blood drawn. He watched, and afterward held the vial in his hand, telling his father, "It's warm." His parents encourage his curiosity in everything he's interested in, and he’s interested in EVERYTHING. No "Jesus Camp" indoctrination here. He’s what you were born with, what you have a right to be, and he’s loving and caring and gets angry at injustice and unfairness - just like you, isn’t he?

Strike three on religions: they don't respect childhood capabilities or the right to respect that children are entitled to. Kids are accused of being the "carriers of original sin," and, oh, the terrible things religions do to their minds with such an attitude. Such gutless harm has been done in the name of holiness, and the demand for respect for ”unquestionable" authority!

Trust in religious leaders or churches is seriously misplaced trust. Aren’t you glad that you don’t respect those who so egregiously disrespect you?


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro