Skip to main content

Tribal Versus Universal

By Carl S ~

If you should happen to be present when a church service ends and the believers are exiting, you might ask, "So how was your tribal meeting?" They might wonder, "Now, what's that all about?"

Tribal chief from Atappadi
Tribal chief from Atappadi (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Dr. Edward O. Wilson, U.S. biologist and social analyzer, in a recent interview (24 Jan. 2015, New Scientist.), spoke about our anciently-established structures. He notes that religions “have their own answers to the big questions, but these are usually bound as dogma to some kind of tribe." Later on, he talks about the theory "that humans, as a species, share a religious impulse, and that ... this transcendent searching has been hijacked by the tribal religions. So, I would say that for the sake of human progress, the best thing we could possibly do would be to diminish, to the point of eliminating, religious faiths." In pondering these words, I have come to some conclusions, starting with:

Should we allow primitive tribal systems to dictate over the human race?

Blood is thicker than water. Unfortunately, too often faith is thicker than blood.Religions are tribal. They are all extensions of ancient tribal unity and thinking. All of them practice good works among their own members. Each uses fear as a means of control. Each avoids, or engages in open or covert warfare with the "outsiders," i.e., those often perceived as threats. Too often, in order to reinforce its "truth" and expand, the tribe will seek to conquer by force of arms or law, fear, and intimidation, in order to gain and reinforce its power by adding more "converts."

Global-wide religions, being tribal, will always be a threat to humankind. Think of all the Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Israeli conflicts and wars of the past, still ongoing even among their own tribal-sects, for a start.

Tribal church loyalties allow thousands of children throughout the world to be raped by clergy, and allow children in Africa to be branded as "witches" and thereby to be beaten and burned. Let us not forget the Christian Right or Catholic bishops waging their legal wars on our own turf, denying legal human rights, each with their own tribal leaders. Popes, priests, ministers, imams, rabbis, chiefs, voodoo practitioners, witch doctors, preachers, faith-healers of all faiths, and oracles; they all serve the same function: power over the minds of others.

Consider that every religious congregation is really a tribe, each with its own particular lingo, superstitions and folklore adapted from that of other tribal cultures, and that each church- tribe considers itself (like Native American Indian tribes), as part of a larger tribal Nation. To Christians, their church is the Universal Church. Yet, when I point out the atrocities and denials of human rights committed by Christians, the response I get is, "Not in my church." (Unlike laws in Islamic countries, there is no threat of death or other punishment for questioning or criticizing religion in theirs.) "Not in MY church." Doesn't their church share responsibility in being loyal to and non-critical of these inhumane deeds perpetuated by leading representatives of their faith? Aren't they complicit in guilt by being silent? Consider just those children who have suffered and died because of that allegiance.

Tribal loyalty is every church's absolute and primary function, tacit and unquestionable. Members share their personal experiences and concerns in formats determined by the tribal chief and the membership, but only in a way that supports the beliefs of the tribe. Each tribe has its own divinely revealed "truths," its rites of passage, and nonsensical rituals to imprint on the memories and emotions of its participants. In these ways, strong, impregnable bonds are created and maintained. Social punishment, which may entail ostracism, excommunication, etc., comes from questioning or not co-operating with tribal rules, many of which can be immoral. (Where is the "sacred" in this?)

Tribal systems punish apostates. ( In some Islamic countries, leaving the religion-tribe will get you executed. Even differing with Islamic beliefs can get you imprisoned and/or physically punished in every one of those countries.) Falling out with any tribe-religion often ensues from doctrinal differences and doubts in one's interpretation of their dogmas. Leaving is divorce. As with every divorce, the parting often comes from an accumulation of reasons to separate, usually resulting from disillusionment. As a secular humanist married to a Christian, I can attest to my prejudicial experiences in being an "outsider," at best, tolerated by her tribe. I am completely censored by its unspoken loyalties. The words of Matt. ch. 10, vs. 34-37 are self-fulfilling.

There is an old adage: Blood is thicker than water. Unfortunately, too often faith is thicker than blood.

Religions hide behind the smoke-screen claim of moral superiority. They exist as tribal organisms perpetuating the “us versus them" divisiveness in societies. Therefore, they must be confronted. They belong with the ages when the world was flat and the sky was a bowl with gods above it. We can see our entire planet now and are aware of other cultures, the feelings and sufferings of our shared humanity. We are a human family on a finite Earth with its finite resources, and it's overdue, the realizing that there isn't anybody "out there" who will save us. We have to save one another. But as long as humans still are willing to look the other way and accept primitive tribal-religion loyalties as virtuous, with their obstructions, their revenges and destruction, then their status quo will not change. We must reject and oppose them because we care about all of humanity and the only world we live in.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi