Skip to main content

The True Church

By Pedro ~

June 14, 2019: many people in Brazil went to the streets to protest against several unpopular government proposals of cutting funds for education and privatize higher education, and so did I. In the city where I live, Maceió, during the protest, some people such as union leaders and the university dean from the Federal University of Alagoas gave speeches, and one of these people was a Christian religious leader (I do not know if he is catholic or protestant).

This Christian leader said something that always makes me angry. Something I have heard many other Christians saying in the last couple of years. He said: “Churches that are racist, sexist, misogynist and homophobic are not real churches, for Christ lived among the sinners and the minorities.” (I am paraphrasing, his exact words were similar to these, but I cannot remember every single word).

Well, he said that because Brazil current president, Jair Bolsonaro, is well known for being racist, sexist, misogynist and homophobic and the protest was against Bolsonaro’s political proposals to Brazil. Therefore, he, as a religious leader and a Christian, wanted to show that the church is not like the racist, sexist, misogynist and homophobic president. He said that so the people in that protest, many who are openly gay, feminist and from the black movement, would see the church as an ally in that battle for social justice, not an enemy. However, is that man’s claim legit? In my opinion, no it is not. I will explain myself giving two reasons.

Protest Barricade in Bebedouro neighborhood, in Maceió (AL)
First, it irritates me when Christian people make such claims because it seems like they are ignoring History and denying their responsibility as source of racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia. I will not make the case that without Christianity our society would not have these problems or that Christianity has to get all the blame for these negative aspects of western societies. However, it cannot be denied that the bible has many passages that encourage racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia and that those passages were used, and still are used, to perpetuate suffering among women, gays and black people. Besides, even the churches that try to be more inclusive to gays, more egalitarian in gender relations and more just to black people, often fail to recognize the historical role of Christianity in the development of a society that is unfair to these groups of people and its influence in keeping these people down.

He said homophobic churches are not real churches. Less than a century ago, it would be considered blasphemy to every Christian denomination in the world, and even today, his statement will be accused of being heretical by most of the Christians in the world.

Second, it irritates me when one Christian claims that there is a true church a false church. I know that the theme of the true people of god pervades the whole bible. Since the true faithful Israelites inside the untrue idolaters in Israel (preached by so many prophets of the Old Testament) until the admonitions of false Christians and false masters in the New Testament, there are many passages teaching that there are many who claim to be from god, but not all are true. Even though I know that, it still makes me angry every time that I hear this type of claim. “My church is the right one and theirs is not. The churches that teach/do so and so are wrong, but the ones that do the opposite are right.” It irritates me because even though we know that there has never been unity in Christianity, even from the first Century A.D. there were already Christians accusing other Christians of heresy, people still think they can make the claim that them, and only them, have the right interpretation of Christianity.

He said homophobic churches are not real churches. Well, less than a century ago, it would be considered blasphemy to every Christian denomination in the world, and even today, his statement will be accused of being heretical by most of the Christians in the world. So, doesn’t he realize that what he believes constitutes true Christianity is exactly what other Christians consider to be the opposite of the message of Christ? Maybe even a message from the devil? Doesn’t he know the history of Christianity, so full of ideological battles, contradictions and persecutions? Does he know these things (and many others) or he just ignores them? I do not know for sure.

In my view, Christianity is a discourse. There are many discourses about what we today call the Christian god, and these discourses are in conflict with each other. These discourses about Christ, about the bible, about god, about society, about women, about gender roles, about sex, about marriage, about family, these discourses are complex, dynamic, they diverge from each other in so many important issues, and they all can be backed up by the bible. In that context, who can argue to be the true church?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

ACTS OF GOD

By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not