Skip to main content

Tribute to Mythicist D.M. Murdock, 1961-2015

By Jenniferg ~

A couple of weeks ago, on You Tube, I stumbled upon a beautiful,articulate woman, D.M. Murdock (also known as Acharya S.) mythicist, scholar, anthropologist,archeologist and writer. I was fascinated by her two-hour presentation about the Christ myth theory.While I’ve heard general claims by skeptics about Christianity being founded on ancient myths, I’ve never come across such an extensive presentation on the subject. Massachusetts-born Murdock, was an independent scholar of comparative religion and anthology.

I write of Murdock in the past tense, because on visiting her website, I learned that she had been diagnosed with inflammatory Stage IV breast cancer in April 2015. She sadly drew her last breath on Christmas Day 2015. Saddened by this news of someone with so much more to give to the world, I write this article in tribute to Dorothy M. Murdock, 1961-2015.

In a phone interview with the writer on Mythicist Milwaukee, Murdock’s credentials are introduced as follows: She holds a Bachelor of Liberal Arts degree in the Classics and Greek Civilization, from Franklin and Marshall College, Pennsylvania. She is a member of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens,Greece.  She was a trench master of archeological excavation Corinth, as well as Connecticut (under the auspices of archeologist, Dr. Kenneth L. Feder.)

Murdock published her first book, in 1999, arguing theJesus Christ concept to be myth. She posits the Jesus Christ story to be nothing but afabrication.

In 2007, Murdock acted aschief consulting author for the “Christ myth theory” portion of Zeitgeist, adocumentary film by Peter Joseph that by all reports went viral on theinternet. 

In the preface of The Zeistgeist Sourcebook: Part 1 — The Greatest Story Ever Told, Murdoch writes, “I  have  spent  the  past several  years defending this… and bringing  forth its sources into  the  light  of  day.  I  have written  not only  a  number  of  articles and eBooks  but  also  a  nearly  600 page book about Christ  in  Egypt:  The Horus - Jesus  connection elucidating  upon  these  sources, highlighting the very  profound correspondences  between  Christianity and  the  ancient  Egyptian  religion. I have also done a number of videos and audio recordings on this subject as well… There are over 150 sources cited in this Sourcebook, in nearly 350 footnotes.”

Murdock’s 2009 work, The Gospel According to Acharya S., is a comparative study of mythology and religion in which she wrote a chapter titled“Abraham is Brahma? Moses is Dionysus?” Her treatise on whether Moses existed issaid to be the most comprehensive study to date.

Over the years Murdock’s theories have for the most part drawn negativecommentaries from academic scholars such as Bart Erhman and Robert M. Price, the latter who laterrecanted his criticisms of Murdock’s research.

On her website, Truth Be Known, Price wrote, "I find myself in full agreement with Acharya S/D.M. Murdock... I find it undeniable that...many, many of the epic heroes and ancient patriarchs and matriarchs of the Old Testament were personified stars, planets and constellations..." —Dr. Robert M. Price, The Pre-Nicene New Testament.

Ehrman, however, was not as magnanimous as Price.  He was particularly critical of Murdock’s book The Christ Conspiracy published in 1999.  In his book Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, New Testament scholar, Bart Ehrman discusses The Christ Conspiracy which he calls"the breathless conspirator's dream." Ehrman says "…All ofAcharya's major points are in fact wrong" and her book "is filled with so manyfactual errors and outlandish assertions that it is hard to believe the author isserious."  "Mythicists of this ilk should not be surprised that theirviews are not taken seriously by real scholars, mentioned by experts in the field, or even read bythem. As a rebuttal to Ehrman's critiques, Robert M. Price, Richard Carrier, D.M. Murdock, and others, published the book Bart Ehrman and the Quest of the Historical Jesus of Nazareth (2013).

Murdock responds on her blog,“All of my major points are wrong?!”  She contends one of her majorpoints is that the gospels “come long after Jesus’ death, written by people whonever saw the man.” If that point is wrong,” Murdock argues, “so toois Ehrman’s contention of same, when he asserts that the four canonical gospels were notwritten by those in whose name they are pretended to be.”

On her Free Thought Nation blog, Murdock quotes someof Ehrman’s statements from his April 1, 2012, National Public Radio (NPR) interview, DidJesus Exist? The interviewer summarizes New Testament scholar Ehrman’s views on the debateabout whether or not Jesus Christ is a mythical figure:

“Mythicists’ arguments are fairlyplausible, Ehrman says. According to them, Jesus was never mentioned in any Roman sources and thereis no archeological evidence that Jesus ever existed. Even Christian sources are problematic– the Gospels come long after Jesus’ death, written by people who never saw theman…. Most importantly…these mythicists point out that there are Pagan godswho were said to die and rise again and so the idea is that Jesus was made up as a Jewish god whodied and rose again…. The mythicists have some right things to say… TheGospels do portray Jesus in ways that are non-historical.”

Here Ehrman seems to recant his earlier criticism ofthe likes of Murdock’s findings.

In her interview with Mythicist MilwaukeeMurdock laments that the vast majority of historians are not familiar with the [findings and writings of mythicists] Many writings of skeptic sand critics of the day were destroyed but some were preserved in the polemics. Murdock said that modern historians tend not to question why writings by Christianity’s detractors were destroyed and not preserved. She expresses disappointment about fellow skeptics’ lack of support for her efforts. She voices that skeptical [academic] scholars were difficult to approach as well as being contentious. Her work being resisted at every turn by religionist fanatics, she stated that she would make great progress if she had a team of open minded skeptical scholars in multiple disciplines to access possible hidden archives in the Vatican, but there are simply “too many biases and push backs.”

One example of Murdock’s research regarding the Jesus Christ contrivance, showsthat it was ‘prophesied’ Jesus was to be born in Bethlehem. Jesus was said tohave come from Nazareth.  In the New Testament Jesus is written about as ‘Jesusthe Nazarene’ - "We have, in fact, found this man a pestilent fellow, an agitatoramong all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes"(Acts 24:5, New Revised Standard Version).

According to Murdock, Nazarenes of which the character, Samson, was a member, indeedcomes from an Old Testament sect. Murdock says the Nazarenes were skilled carpenters and in fact hada carpenters’ guild. Wine making was also a strong motif in mythology –Dionysus(Bacchus) being the god of the vine, grape harvest, wine making, wine, religious ecstasy andtheatre.  Murdock asserts that these were all factors incorporated into the interpolationof the Greek language a century later in the invention of Jesus the Nazarene.

Murdock’s states that her research is drawn from primary sources as well theworks  from “credentialed  authorities  in a  variety  of  relevant subjects.” 

D.M. Murdock departed this planet all too soon.

She writes, “Indeed, I have strived to include the best and most thorough scholarly and modern sources wherever possible, with the result that many authorities cited here possess credentials from respected institutes of higher learning, and their publishers are some of the most scholarly inEnglish (and other languages.) Murdock’s body of work has gained respect and high praisefrom a number of academics. Here are some website testimonials:

"Murdock's scholarship is relentless! ...there search conducted by D.M. Murdock concerning the myth of Jesus Christ is certainly both valuableand worthy of consideration." —Dr. Kenneth L. Feder, Professor of Archaeology, Central Connecticut State University, Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology

"Acharya S deserves to be recognized as a leading researcher and an expert inthe field of comparative mythology, on a par with James Frazer or Robert Graves—indeed,superior to those forerunners in the frankness of her conclusions and the volume of her evidence." —Barbara Walker, The Women's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets and Man Made God. 

“I’ve known people with triple Ph.D’s who haven’tcome close to the scholarship in Who Was Jesus?” —Pastor David Bruce,M.Div, North Park Seminary, Chicago,

Said one commentator on her website, “TheMythicist, Scholar, Anthropologist, and Archaeologist who has demonstrated to us Truth aboutReligion and Myth over the years, has passed [,] on a key Mythic/Julian original Solstice date ofDecember 25th.”

Let’shope that modern academics would put aside their biases and egos, and like Robert Price have openminds to take up the remarkable body of research mined by Murdock and build upon it.

For further viewing and reading:


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two