Skip to main content

That’s Entertainment!

By Carl S. ~

To solve the puzzles in life or fabricated, you have to look for the clues and put them together. If you have just enough, you can build a case. If you don’t have enough, you can still begin the process, so that others can join in the search with you. Together, you can solve the puzzle.

Some puzzles have been around for ages. Serious puzzles for which no one seems to have the answers and for which countless men and women have made up their own answers, and those answers are accepted because no one feels the puzzles are worth solving, or they're content to accept any answers that feel good in lieu of real solutions. I'm one of those detectives who is discontent to accept just any answers, when they impress me as being nothing more than fabricated b.s. One reason for this attitude is the joy I find in discovering explanations that solve puzzles simply by being persistent at looking for clues. But sometimes, I just stumble over them. One person's discoveries, another person's stumbling block. Let me begin by listing some of them, all related to emotions:

In Thomas Cahill‘s book, “Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea,” subtitled, “Why the Greeks Matter,” page 80 is enlightening. ”The Muses could be capricious in awarding their favors and vindictive in withholding them. Thus Homer‘s need to placate his Muse regularly, lest she withdraw his gift of inspiration. Inspiration and truth were two different things, however. The success of a poetic performance lay in the emotional transformation it wrought on its audience. The Muses didn't care whether what they inspired was true or false as long as it grabbed the listeners.” Read that again, only this time substitute the term “God” for “Muse” and “Muses.” Wait a minute! Doesn’t that sound like religions, with their emphasis on “emotional transformation” over rationality and truth? Doesn’t “the end justifies the means” apply here? Isn’t this how all religions operate, with lies and truths co-mingled for emotional effect? How often have we heard the truth of a believers faith defined as, “l know in my heart”?

Well, I read Cahill’s sentence about the “emotional transformation” to a church-goer. She said that emotions are really true, not false. This got me to mentioning the song “Cry,” with the verse, “When waking from a bad dream, don't you sometimes think it’s real? But it's only false emotion that you feel.” I think emotional responses are neither true nor false - but the manipulation of emotions can be true or false. The reason: emotional reactions may be responses to false alarms, false fears, false hopes - all used by practitioners of faiths for their manipulations, and all justified for the advancement of their faiths.

Entertainment is what it‘s all about - whatever it takes to make the audience feel good.Entertainment is what it‘s all about - whatever it takes to make the audience feel good. In show business parlance, “People will kill to get into the show.” For example, the new movie promoted by the Religious Right, “The Son of God,” has no regard for truth at all. It’s pure emotional manipulation, as was “The Passion of the Christ” preceding it. Take the “Left Behind” series of books. Pure fantasy pretending to be based on actual fact, appealing to and manipulating the most righteous and biased emotions, a la the Nazi propaganda system. Truth is indifferent for such ends. It's all entertaining, though, and in all these examples, that's what the audience wants. (l have watched good old Jimmy Swaggart put on his pop act.)

Entertainment demands that religions must continually supply fresh material; hence religion creates its own reality tied to the powerful desire to escape from reality. But, even reality has to be interpreted through dogmatic fantasy to stay entertaining and keep the business operating. But don’t tell me it's anything but entertainment, because, if we notice, whenever stark reality stands cut on its own, it usually gets rejected in favor of the fantasy creations.

I stumble across information from many sources. On the I.D. Channel program, “Who the (Bleep) Did I Marry?” was a true story about a woman who got romantically involved with a guy for years. She was in person, relating her history with him, as the program played out. He would disappear for weeks or months during their relationship. In the end, it turned out that he confessed to being a bank robber and was arrested. At the end of the program, after admitting that she was deceived by him the entire time, she was still in love with him. I ran to grab something to write down her remark about this. She said, “I was head over heels in love with him, even if he was a made-up person.” My goodness, how many are “in love with Jesus,” even if he is only a made-up person?!

Tim R. writes of his experience of “being saved” - one of those frequently related conversions so often seen on this site. He says, ”That night, I decided I would pray to be saved. I walked down to the front where the preacher, my aunt, and cousin all led me in a prayer to ask Jesus into my heart. It was a very emotional experience for me. I believed I was truly saved.” Again, I ask you to re-read what he has said, only this time substitute “Allah, Mithra, Apollo, Baal, etc. into my heart.” Get it? It was a “very emotional experience” for everyone believing in them who did so, too. Do those emotions last, any longer than the gods did, or did the believers just keep up the practice of striving to maintain those emotions? (And what the hell do those emotions have to do with either reality or morals?)

Okay, so religious faith-rituals are all about the “emotional transformation it effects on the audience.” You might say that the emotional triumphs over the rational, which the believers must find boring and thought-provoking, which is not entertaining, which takes thinking, which isn't fun. (They’re spoiled that way, don’t you think?) But this causes problems; for, if emotions are sanctified, how do religious leaders reconcile the mixed message of, “If it feels good in the Holy Spirit and in Jesus, it's good, go for it,” with If it feels good, don’t do it,” as in “Don't have sex before marriage.”? But, according to those same criteria, if it feels good, do it, and repent later. After all, repenting feels good too. (In some Islamic societies, males and females are separated; females are covered from head to toes. This policy leads to homoerotic tendencies - which are forbidden and punishable.)

When people are unwilling or unable to distinguish between entertainment and reality, they set themselves up for emotional manipulation and confusion of mind. They make their emotions available for dictators, clergy, and radical movements of all stripes. When they are willing to follow those emotions they can use them to deny rights, destroy, to feel justified in threatening the lives, rights, and properties of others who do not share their entertained emotions.

Wow. That’s costly entertainment!


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

On Living Virtuously

By Webmdave ~  A s a Christian, living virtuously meant living in a manner that pleased God. Pleasing god (or living virtuously) was explained as: Praying for forgiveness for sins  Accepting Christ as Savior  Frequently reading the Bible  Memorizing Bible verses Being baptized (subject to church rules)  Attending church services  Partaking of the Lord’s Supper  Tithing  Resisting temptations to lie, steal, smoke, drink, party, have lustful thoughts, have sex (outside of marriage) masturbate, etc.  Boldly sharing the Gospel of Salvation with unbelievers The list of virtuous values and expectations grew over time. Once the initial foundational values were safely under the belt, “more virtues'' were introduced. Newer introductions included (among others) harsh condemnation of “worldly” music, homosexuality and abortion Eventually the list of values grew ponderous, and these ideals were not just personal for us Christians. These virtues were used to condemn and disrespect fro