Skip to main content

The Bible says what is says about women

By John Draper ~

Progressive Christians need to have the proverbial Come to Jesus Moment about the Bible.

Earlier this year, the trending hashtag on Twitter was #ThingsOnlyChristianWomenHear, started, I guess, by a Christian feminist as an afterthought as she was boarding a plane. At least it was trending in progressive Christian circles. The gist was that most male churchgoers misinterpret the Bible. The majority of the tweets testified to a daily barrage of discrimination and double standards for women in ministry and beyond. Some examples:

First off, I agree. The Christian feminists are right. Patriarchy and misogyny are indeed rampant in the church. But the people who are pushing those agendas are just following the clear orders of scripture.

The Bible says what it says about women.

Progressives Christians need to come to terms with the very human book they call scripture. It’s not God’s word.

Progressive Christians say all scriptures from Bible that advocate tolerance and equality are indeed inspired, holy writ, and they point to a handful of verses that seem to have a progressive worldview. (For example, they like to point out that Jesus accepted the woman caught in adultery. He didn’t stone her to death, but of course, he never advocated changing the law.) But the overwhelming number of verses that say the polar opposite? They either use tortured logic to say those verses have been misinterpreted for thousands of years—or they just try to change the subject.

For example: It sure seems like the Jesus presented in the gospels believed in a literal hell—a place where bad people were sent to be flame-grilled. This makes progressive Christians uncomfortable—their God of Love and Grace would never send a person to hell, would he? So, to alleviate their cognitive dissonance, progressive Christians trot out all sorts of flimsy solutions, prominent among them being that Jesus was “accommodating” his message for the benighted listeners. That is, they weren’t ready for the truth—so Jesus had to “dumb down” his teaching.

Just following orders

Okay, the question I would ask those progressive Christians who say conservative believers have misinterpreted Paul for 2,000 years: How did the people Paul wrote his letters to interpret his teachings? You would think they interpreted him correctly, as they were living in the same culture, where words had common meanings. How did the first-century church (and the ancient Israelites) treat homosexuals? How did the first-century church treat women? Yes, there are a few exceptions that progressive Christians like to trot out—like the fact that Priscilla seemed to be a woman of some influence in the early church. But those are the exceptions that prove the rule.

The Bible was written by men, progressive Christians. Deal with it.

And deal with this—God is not interested in talking to you. He’s not interested in letting you know his opinions on matters. If he were, he would. Does that mean he doesn’t love us? I don’t know. I’m just trying to interpret the actual data we have. That is, the only way God speaks to his followers is through his creation—what scholars call general revelation to contrast it with burning bushes and prophetic utterances: special revelation. As theologian Michael Dowd says, “Evidence is our scripture.” All truth is God’s truth.

(If you can come up with an explanation of how general revelation tells you that God loves you, more power to you. Just remember, along with the rainbows and waterfalls, you have to account for the carcinogenic sunbeams slanting through your parlor window and for the poison monkeys. To me, it’s a mixed bag. General revelation tells of a God who is indifferent to humans, at best. See Does God Speak Through Scripture? Yes and No.)

Read all the red letters

So what’s my advice for progressive Christians? Keep fighting for women’s rights and LGBTQ rights—but also, be honest about the Bible. Honest about God. And stop making Jesus out to be something he wasn’t. He wasn’t a modern-day progressive Christian. He was an ancient conservative Jew.

Progressive Christians like to call themselves Red-Letter Christians—the meaning being that the teachings of Jesus, printed in red in most Bibles, take precedence for them. That’s fine. But they need to know what they’re really saying. Sure, Jesus said a lot of great stuff in the Bible—about loving you enemies, for example. But he also said a lot of benighted stuff—see above discussion about hell.

The Bible says what it says about women.My advice to progressive Christians, to the emergent church, is to be done with the Bible. It does more harm than good, if you want my opinion.

That’s probably not going to happen, though. The Bible is just so deeply embedded into our culture. So, I guess, keep pointing to the places in scripture where Jesus is loving and tolerant. But don’t feel like you’re obliged to come up with explanations for the verses where he’s an asshat. (Why did he call the Samaritan woman a dog?) Just say—he was wrong. (Or at least the guy who wrote the gospel was wrong.) Let’s use our brains to judge scripture, keeping the parts that jibe with modern sensibilities and discarding the parts that paint an unacceptable portrait of God—for example, God commanding the ancient Israelites to slaughter the inhabitants of the Promised Land. Those passages aren’t God’s word. They are nationalistic propaganda, meant to justify the status quo, keep people obeying the higher ups.

The Bible says what it says.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi