Skip to main content

The tree in the Garden of Eden

By Karen Garst, The Faithless Feminist ~

And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground the LORD God made to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. (Genesis 2:8-9)

And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; but God said, `You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.'” But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, and he ate. Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons. (Genesis 2:2-7)

So what is the backstory on what happens in these passages? Did the Hebrews create this story out of whole cloth or was there a similar story in other cultures with which they would have come in contact? And what was the purpose of this story in Genesis?
Let’s start with the tales of the Sumerians. The Sumerian civilization was the first literate civilization. Early evidence of their civilization from approximately 3,500 BCE predates any reference to Hebrews or Israelites in the region by over 2,000 years. Because the Sumerians and subsequently the Akkadians and the Babylonians ruled over large stretches of the Middle East, its history, culture, and stories were known throughout the region. In addition, the Hebrews were exiled in Babylonia for four decades in 587 BCE.
The location of many cities of the Sumerians was in the desert, much of present day Iraq. Thus, it is not unusual that their myths attributed great powers to water and the vegetation it could provide. (You can read the original Sumerian myth here.) For example, Enki, one of the early gods of the Sumerians, was believed to have lived in a place near an aquifer and was called the “Sweet Waters God.” He lived in Dilmun, “the pure clean and bright land of the living, the garden of the Great Gods and Earthly paradise, located eastward in Eden.”
Ninhursag was a female goddess, perhaps serving alone prior to her sacred marriage to Enki. In the story, she feels the waters of Enki within her and asks him to tend to her earthly body and provide waters for it. He responds willingly and creates waters and streams which allow great vegetation to grow. She leaves for the winter to prepare for the spring and all it brings to the earth.
Unfortunately, Enki gets a bit carried away with the young goddesses that he and Ninhursag have created. When Ninhursag returns she advises these young goddesses to stay clear of Enki. She tells one of them, Uttu, who is disappointed that Enki no longer cares for her, to take the seed of Enki (read sperm) and plant them in the ground. From these eight seeds all the plants of the earth grow. She also tells Uttu to remember that all relationships of love should be reciprocal. I can’t help but wonder if this would have been the mythology I had grown up with rather than the Bible which treats all women as property. Wouldn’t it have been nice to have a strong compassionate woman goddess as a model versus an angry misogynist male god?
When these plants grow, he eats the eight plants, one of which is a “tree plant,” and becomes ill. Ninhursag, the ever faithful wife, comes to the rescue and cures Enki. It is when he complains of his eighth pain, that of his rib, that she responds with the incantation “to the goddess Ninti, the Lady of the Rib and the One who makes Live, I have given birth for you to set your rib free.” What is interesting here is the fact that the Sumerian word “ti” means both “rib” and “life.” In Genesis, the word Eve means life but the Hebrew word for rib is different, thus missing the pun in the Sumerian version.
Once he is cured, he is stronger than ever and kisses his beloved Ninhursag. He realizes it is Ninhursag that he truly loves and they live happily ever after.
While they are many similarities to the Genesis story just in this myth, there are other associations that are just as important. In many ancient cultures, the mother goddess, who was worshipped prior to and then in conjunction with male deities in a pantheon, was associated with a serpent. This serpent was the symbol of “rebirth, rejuvenation, rebirth, healing as well as service and wisdom.” In some Mesopotamian art, this goddess is portrayed with a female body and the head of a serpent.
snake with the fruit of sin
What is significant in the worship of female goddesses was the association with nature. This divine female was seen as both bringing forth life and taking life back to its womb, the earth, upon death. The tree, with its roots in the ground and its branches above symbolized this cycle of birth from the earth and return to the earth upon death. In the Old Testament, the word Asherah, stands both for the Canaanite goddess of the same name and the pillar or tree where she was worshipped in nature. In this aspect, she is similar to all the previous earth goddesses in many cultures.
The transformation of the role of the tree of life in Genesis is significant because it is the symbol of the goddess turned on its head. Instead of representing both life and death in an endless cycle, the tree brings upon mankind its destruction. God is now the creator and the symbol for the goddess, the tree, accompanied by the serpent, becomes the path for sin. To no one’s surprise, the woman, Eve, becomes the first of mankind tempted by the fruit of this tree.
You can read another post I have written about Eve here and here is another post about the influence of Babylonia.


Popular posts from this blog

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not


By David Andrew Dugle ~   S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden –  Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

I can fix ignorance; I can't fix stupid!

By Bob O ~ I 'm an atheist and a 52-year veteran of public education. I need not tell anyone the problems associated with having to "duck" the "Which church do you belong to?" with my students and their parents. Once told by a parent that they would rather have a queer for their sons' teacher than an atheist! Spent HOURS going to the restroom right when prayers were performed: before assemblies, sports banquets, "Christmas Programs", awards assemblies, etc... Told everyone that I had a bladder problem. And "yes" it was a copout to many of you, but the old adage (yes, it's religious) accept what you can't change, change that which you can and accept the strength to know the difference! No need arguing that which you will never change. Enough of that. What I'd like to impart is my simple family chemistry. My wife is a Baptist - raised in a Baptist Orphanage (whole stories there) and is a believer. She did not know my religi