Suppose There's No God? Live. Love. Laugh

By Carl S. ~

Since there's no evidence for a God, gods or goddesses, the supposing will go on ad infinitum. Why go any further, why bother to? All theologies are “systems of opinions;” real explanations are needed for why things are the way they are. These we have in abundance. Should we care about explanations for how and why people just “know” God is talking to them, telling them what his will is for them? Just because “they” say they sincerely believe something, that doesn't make it true. So we swim out, freed from the religious equivalent of a huge oceanic ball of frenzied fish, and think and think. We look with opened eyes at the evidence in the Universe, we start adding it up, and it all makes sense: no God.

“God” as an all-important concept, primarily lives in the patterns of a malfunctioning or drug-distorted brain. Rituals for this God are obsessive-compulsive; often repeating behavioral patterns of the insane. It's claimed God lives in a “spiritual” realm. There’s no proof of it. “Spiritual” often refers to an emotional state of mind, interpreted to be an alternative realm. This presents a problem: “spiritual” people are in danger of being taken in and used/abused, by “spiritual guides.” Without believing in a God, we are safe from that web. We can be sane, at ease, and go on with living. We look around us and see the majority of humans are doing the same. All those worn-out “explanations” for God only led to more what-ifs and don't make sense. One thing education teaches us is what's been learned from the mistakes of others. Religious “education,” on the other hand, teaches us to keep making the mistakes of others.

Without the “spiritual” there is no religious faith. Without “it,” no cults would sprout, driven by stand-ins for God or gods, who enforce what they claim are “spiritual revelations” given to them by a deity. Without “spirituality,” cults/religions could not begin - every single one - with very pleasant feelings, assurances, and an overwhelming sense of belonging. Without faith in faith, they couldn't drive members deeply into commitment, demanding loyalty, obedience, above and beyond sanity and morality. Suppose “spiritual” meant placebo, emotional cotton candy? There would be no idealized “love” for God and neighbor demanded by religions, a love unsustainable and leading to personal and social emotional conflicts. Without God, suppose there's no such mind control.

I have a personal relationship with God. Both he and I know he's a jerk.Without “God,” there would be no: God is Great. God is watching you. God has a plan for you. God is in control. God does not give you more than you can handle. The family that prays together stays together. God says abortion is killing babies. (Though, in nature, billions of unborn organisms perish every day.) Whatever you ask for in Jesus' name will be given to you. Greater works than Jesus has done will you do. Nothing succeeds like prayer. Let go and let God. And let us not forget the familiar lure of: You too can have, as I have, a personal relationship with God. None of these claims holds water. Sans God, there would be no men of God using God, determined to force their wills down our throats, in his name. (btw: I have a personal relationship with God. Both he and I know he's a jerk.)

What's the value of faith when we know about the crazy explanations of reality from many different cultures, each one believing very seriously in those explanations? For examples, we have the beliefs in the Hindu polytheistic gods, Maori deities, the Aztec and Greek fabrications, Native American spirit- beliefs, and countless others. When so many different cultures believe very sincerely in abundantly different interpretations of reality - if that is what is meant by faith - why should we give faith any more respect than we give to a troubled mind's superstitions? There should be no faith in faith, knowing these things. Generally speaking, faith is believing what another tells you, in what “they” say is true. But suppose faith isn't true? Suppose it's all made up? Of course it is.

Comments

Are You an Atheist Success Story?

By Avangelism Project ~ F acts don’t spread. Stories do. It’s how (good) marketing works, it’s how elections (unfortunately) are won and lost, and it’s how (all) religion spreads. Proselytization isn’t accomplished with better arguments. It’s accomplished with better stories and it’s time we atheists catch up. It’s not like atheists don’t love a good story. Head over to the atheist reddit and take a look if you don’t believe me. We’re all over stories painting religion in a bad light. Nothing wrong with that, but we ignore the value of a story or a testimonial when we’re dealing with Christians. We can’t be so proud to argue the semantics of whether atheism is a belief or deconversion is actually proselytization. When we become more interested in defining our terms than in affecting people, we’ve relegated ourselves to irrelevance preferring to be smug in our minority, but semantically correct, nonbelief. Results Determine Reality The thing is when we opt to bury our

So Just How Dumb Were Jesus’ Disciples? The Resurrection, Part VII.

By Robert Conner ~ T he first mention of Jesus’ resurrection comes from a letter written by Paul of Tarsus. Paul appears to have had no interest whatsoever in the “historical” Jesus: “even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, we know him so no longer.” ( 2 Corinthians 5:16 ) Paul’s surviving letters never once mention any of Jesus’ many exorcisms and healings, the raising of Lazarus, or Jesus’ virgin birth, and barely allude to Jesus’ teaching. For Paul, Jesus only gets interesting after he’s dead, but even here Paul’s attention to detail is sketchy at best. For instance, Paul says Jesus “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” ( 1 Corinthians 15:4 ), but there are no scriptures that foretell the Jewish Messiah would at long last appear only to die at the hands of Gentiles, much less that the Messiah would then be raised from the dead after three days. After his miraculous conversion on the road to Damascus—an event Paul never mentions in his lette

Christian TV presenter reads out Star Wars plot as story of salvation

An email prankster tricked the host of a Christian TV show into reading out the plots of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air and Star Wars in the belief they were stories of personal salvation. The unsuspecting host read out most of the opening rap to The Fresh Prince, a 1990s US sitcom starring Will Smith , apparently unaware that it was not a genuine testimony of faith. The prankster had slightly adapted the lyrics but the references to a misspent youth playing basketball in West Philadelphia would have been instantly familiar to most viewers. The lines read out by the DJ included: "One day a couple of guys who were up to no good starting making trouble in my living area. I ended up getting into a fight, which terrified my mother." The presenter on Genesis TV , a British Christian channel, eventually realised that he was being pranked and cut the story short – only to move on to another spoof email based on the plot of the Star Wars films. It began: &quo

ACTS OF GOD

By David Andrew Dugle ~ S ettle down now children, here's the story from the Book of David called The Parable of the Bent Cross. In the land Southeast of Eden – Eden, Minnesota that is – between two rivers called the Big Miami and the Little Miami, in the name of Saint Gertrude there was once built a church. Here next to it was also built a fine parochial school. The congregation thrived and after a multitude of years, a new, bigger church was erected, well made with clean straight lines and a high steeple topped with a tall, thin cross of gold. The faithful felt proud, but now very low was their money. Their Sunday offerings and school fees did not suffice. Anon, they decided to raise money in an unclean way. One fine summer day the faithful erected tents in the chariot lot between the two buildings. In the tents they set up all manner of games – ring toss, bingo, little mechanical racing horses and roulette wheels – then all who lived in the land between the two rivers we

Morality is not a Good Argument for Christianity

By austinrohm ~ I wrote this article as I was deconverting in my own head: I never talked with anyone about it, but it was a letter I wrote as if I was writing to all the Christians in my life who constantly brought up how morality was the best argument for Christianity. No Christian has read this so far, but it is written from the point of view of a frustrated closeted atheist whose only outlet was organizing his thoughts on the keyboard. A common phrase used with non-Christians is: “Well without God, there isn’t a foundation of morality. If God is not real, then you could go around killing and raping.” There are a few things which must be addressed. 1. Show me objective morality. Define it and show me an example. Different Christians have different moral standards depending on how they interpret the Bible. Often times, they will just find what they believe, then go back into scripture and find a way to validate it. Conversely, many feel a particular action is not

Why I left the Canadian Reformed Church

By Chuck Eelhart ~ I was born into a believing family. The denomination is called Canadian Reformed Church . It is a Dutch Calvinistic Christian Church. My parents were Dutch immigrants to Canada in 1951. They had come from two slightly differing factions of the same Reformed faith in the Netherlands . Arriving unmarried in Canada they joined the slightly more conservative of the factions. It was a small group at first. Being far from Holland and strangers in a new country these young families found a strong bonding point in their church. Deutsch: Heidelberger Katechismus, Druck 1563 (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) I was born in 1955 the third of eventually 9 children. We lived in a small southern Ontario farming community of Fergus. Being young conservative and industrious the community of immigrants prospered. While they did mix and work in the community almost all of the social bonding was within the church group. Being of the first generation born here we had a foot in two

Search This Blog