Burdens

By Carl S ~ A quick question I sincerely asked brought a faster response. Question: "When a person is accused of a crime, isn't the burden of proof upon the prosecutor?" Answer: "Of course, the prosecutor has that burden. The person is presumed innocent, without proof otherwise." This reply came so fast that she thought it was obvious to anyone, a no-brainer, so why did I ask? But I was making a test by asking that question of a religious believer. Silently, after doing so, I wondered what it was all about. When people of every religion attest to their unquestioned beliefs, they automatically assume that they needn't have proof for them. There is no burden of proof required for beliefs that people hold to be sacred, untouchable, and deserving of reverent respect. But there should be. If these beliefs are held so, are so very important for "salvation," then all the more must they be examined and questioned, demanded to provide evid...